Step 1: Write down what is given.
There is a nonzero vector \(v\) such that
\[
Av=2v \quad\text{and}\quad Bv=2v
\]
because both matrices share the eigenvalue \(2\) with the same eigenvector.
Step 2: Analyze option (A).
\[
(A-2I)v=Av-2v=2v-2v=0
\]
Since \(v\) is nonzero and \((A-2I)v=0\), the matrix \(A-2I\) is singular. So
\[
\det(A-2I)=0
\]
Option (A) is correct.
Step 3: Analyze option (B).
By the exact same reasoning,
\[
(B-2I)v=Bv-2v=2v-2v=0
\]
so \(B-2I\) is also singular and
\[
\det(B-2I)=0
\]
Option (B) is correct.
Step 4: Analyze option (C).
\[
(A+B-2I)v=Av+Bv-2v=2v+2v-2v=2v
\]
Since \(v\) is nonzero, \((A+B-2I)v\) equals \(2v\), which is not the zero vector. This shows \(v\) is not in the null space of \(A+B-2I\), so nothing in the given data forces this matrix to be singular. Option (C) is incorrect.
Step 5: Analyze option (D).
\[
(A+B-4I)v=Av+Bv-4v=2v+2v-4v=0
\]
Since \(v\) is nonzero and \((A+B-4I)v=0\), the matrix \(A+B-4I\) is singular, so
\[
\det(A+B-4I)=0
\]
Option (D) is correct.
Step 6: Final conclusion.
The common eigenvector \(v\) shows directly that \(A-2I\), \(B-2I\), and \(A+B-4I\) are all singular, while \(A+B-2I\) has no such guarantee.
\[
\boxed{\text{(A), (B), and (D) are correct}}
\]