We need to find the number of geometrical isomers for each complex and then sum them up.
1. [NiCl$_4$]$^{2-}$:
This complex has a central Ni$^{2+}$ ion (d$^8$ configuration). With a weak field ligand like Cl$^-$, it has a tetrahedral geometry.
Tetrahedral complexes of the type [MA$_4$] do not show geometrical isomerism because all positions are equivalent with respect to each other.
Number of isomers = 0.
2. [CoCl$_2$(NH$_3$)$_4$]$^+$:
This complex is of the type [MA$_4$B$_2$] and has an octahedral geometry.
Complexes of this type can exist as two geometrical isomers:
- cis-isomer: The two B ligands (Cl) are adjacent to each other (at a 90$^\circ$ angle).
- trans-isomer: The two B ligands (Cl) are opposite to each other (at a 180$^\circ$ angle).
Number of isomers = 2.
3. [Co(NH$_3$)$_3$(NO$_2$)$_3$]:
This complex is of the type [MA$_3$B$_3$] and has an octahedral geometry.
Complexes of this type can exist as two geometrical isomers:
- facial (fac) isomer: The three identical ligands (e.g., NH$_3$) occupy the corners of one face of the octahedron.
- meridional (mer) isomer: The three identical ligands occupy positions such that two are trans to each other, forming a 'meridian' around the central atom.
Number of isomers = 2.
4. [Co(NH$_3$)$_5$Cl]$^{2+}$:
This complex is of the type [MA$_5$B] and has an octahedral geometry.
In this type, all positions of the five A ligands are equivalent relative to the single B ligand. No matter where the B ligand is placed, the resulting structure is the same.
Number of isomers = 0.
Total number of geometrical isomers = (Isomers of complex 1) + (Isomers of complex 2) + (Isomers of complex 3) + (Isomers of complex 4).
Total number = $0 + 2 + 2 + 0 = 4$.