Comprehension
The search for efficient trade routes and better connectivity has been one of the powerful driving forces of history. It has determined the prospects of many nations, regions and civilizations over time. Today, as the world goes through a fundamental re-balancing, correcting many of the distortions of the past, it is only natural that connectivity should be central to that exercise. Growth in trade, commerce, industrial development and technological advancement has gone hand in hand with ease of connecting. Maritime connectivity, in particular, has played a significant role in creating regional corridors for trade and economic linkages, as indeed for cultural and intellectual exchanges over the centuries. The shift in the fulcrum of global economic growth towards Asia is creating unprecedented opportunities for connectivity in the region. The Government of India, recognising the importance of regional connectivity, made a landmark decision to undertake an overseas port investment in Chabahar.
Question: 1
The Chabahar Day was commemorated by the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways n which of the following Summit?
The Chabahar Day was commemorated by the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways n which of the following Summit?
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- India Water Impact Summit
- Sustainable Ocean Summit
- World Ocean Summit
- Maritime India Summit
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Approach Solution - 1
The correct Answer is (D):Maritime India Summit
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks which summit hosted by the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways was used to mark Chabahar Day, so the focus should be on which of these four events is actually organised by that ministry.
- India Water Impact Summit: This summit deals with river rejuvenation and water resource management and is linked to the Jal Shakti ministry's work, not to the ports and shipping ministry, so it does not fit.
- Sustainable Ocean Summit: This is an international ocean-economy platform, not a dedicated event of India's shipping ministry, so it is not where Chabahar Day was marked.
- World Ocean Summit: This is another global ocean-policy conference organised independently of the Indian ports ministry, so it does not match either.
- Maritime India Summit: This is the flagship event organised by India's Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways to showcase the country's maritime and port sector, and Chabahar Day was commemorated as part of this summit.
The first three summits are all real events but none of them belong to the ports and shipping ministry, while the Maritime India Summit is exactly the ministry's own platform, which is where Chabahar Day was marked.
So the correct answer is Maritime India Summit.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
Which of the following is correct about the Chabahar Port?
Which of the following is correct about the Chabahar Port?
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- It is located in south east of Iran in Oman sea.
- It has marine border of more than 300 km
- Both (A) and (B).
- None of the above
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
The correct Answer is (C):Both (A) and (B).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
This question stacks two factual claims about Chabahar Port and asks which combination is correct, so each individual claim needs to be checked before looking at the combined options.
- It is located in south east of Iran in Oman sea: Chabahar is indeed in south-eastern Iran, in Sistan-Baluchestan province, and it opens onto the Gulf of Oman, so this claim on its own is accurate.
- It has marine border of more than 300 km: Chabahar port's coastal stretch does extend beyond 300 km along the Iranian coast, so this claim also holds up on its own.
- Both (A) and (B): Since both individual claims check out as true, the option that combines them is the one that best matches all the facts together.
- None of the above: This would only be correct if both A and B were false, but both were confirmed true above, so this option cannot be right.
Because the location claim and the coastline-length claim are each independently correct, the option that says both captures the full picture, while none of the above contradicts the two facts already established.
So the correct answer is Both (A) and (B).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
Which of the following statements relate to the Chabahar Port and its impact?
Which of the following statements relate to the Chabahar Port and its impact?
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- It is a transit hub to support landlocked countries of Central Asia
- It will play an important role in international North-South transit Corridor (INSTC).
- It will optimize the logistic cost by bringing in efficiency, and creating a reliable and safe transport corridor
- All of the above
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Approach Solution - 1
The correct Answer is (D):All of the above
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
This question lists three separate claims about what Chabahar Port does and asks which are actually true, so each claim deserves its own check before deciding on all of the above.
- It is a transit hub to support landlocked countries of Central Asia: Chabahar gives landlocked Afghanistan and the Central Asian republics a sea route that bypasses Pakistan, which is exactly the transit-hub role this statement describes, so it is accurate.
- It will play an important role in international North-South transit Corridor (INSTC): Chabahar is a key link in the INSTC network connecting India to Central Asia and Russia via Iran, so this statement is also accurate.
- It will optimize the logistic cost by bringing in efficiency, and creating a reliable and safe transport corridor: By shortening and diversifying trade routes, Chabahar does bring down transport costs and adds a dependable corridor, so this statement holds true as well.
- All of the above: Since each of the three individual statements checks out as true on its own merits, the option covering all three together is the one that fully answers the question.
None of the three individual claims contradicts what Chabahar Port actually does, so picking any single one of them would leave out equally valid facts.
So the correct answer is All of the above.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4
The Chabahar Port is a result of trilateral agreement between which of the followingcountries?
The Chabahar Port is a result of trilateral agreement between which of the followingcountries?
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- India-Iran-Afghanistan
- India-Iran-Iraq
- Iran-Iraq-Afghanistan
- India-Qatar-Pakistan
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Approach Solution - 1
The correct Answer is (A):India-Iran-Afghanistan
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question is about which three countries actually signed the Chabahar trilateral agreement, so matching the countries in each option to the real signatories settles it.
- India-Iran-Afghanistan: These are the three countries that signed the trilateral Chabahar agreement in 2016, with India developing port infrastructure, Iran hosting the port, and Afghanistan gaining a transit route that avoids Pakistan.
- India-Iran-Iraq: Iraq was not part of this agreement; the third country involved was Afghanistan, not Iraq, so this combination is wrong.
- Iran-Iraq-Afghanistan: This option drops India, which was actually the country funding and developing the port terminal, so it cannot be correct.
- India-Qatar-Pakistan: Neither Qatar nor Pakistan was part of the Chabahar agreement; in fact, the whole point of the project was to create a route to Afghanistan that bypasses Pakistan.
Only the India-Iran-Afghanistan combination matches the real signatories; the other three options each substitute in a country that was never actually party to this specific agreement.
So the correct answer is India-Iran-Afghanistan.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5
Which is the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) incorporated for the development and management of Shahid Behesti Port of Chabahar?
Which is the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) incorporated for the development and management of Shahid Behesti Port of Chabahar?
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- The Indian Port Rail Corporation
- Western Shipbuilding Private Limited
- India Ports Global Limited
- Karaikal Port Private Limited
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
The correct Answer is (C):The Indian Port Rail Corporation
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks for the name of the Special Purpose Vehicle set up to develop and manage the Shahid Beheshti Port at Chabahar, so each option needs to be checked against what that SPV is actually called.
- The Indian Port Rail Corporation: This name suggests a rail-linked port body, but the actual entity handling Chabahar port operations is not called this; a similarly named rail-focused body exists for a different purpose, not this SPV.
- Western Shipbuilding Private Limited: This name points to shipbuilding rather than port development and management, which is not the function of the Chabahar SPV, so it does not match.
- India Ports Global Limited: This is the actual company incorporated by the Indian government as the Special Purpose Vehicle to develop and operate the Shahid Beheshti Port terminal at Chabahar.
- Karaikal Port Private Limited: This is a real port company, but it operates the Karaikal Port in Puducherry on India's own coast, unrelated to Chabahar in Iran.
The first, second and fourth options each name a real or plausible-sounding company, but none of them is the entity actually running Shahid Beheshti Port; India Ports Global Limited is the SPV created specifically for that purpose.
So the correct answer is India Ports Global Limited.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top CLAT Questions
- In the realm of contemporary literature, the interplay between character and setting is a nuanced dance that shapes the narrative’s essence. The setting, often described with painstaking detail, becomes more than a backdrop; it becomes a character, influencing the plot and character development.
Consider, for instance, the barren expanse of the desert in Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake. The arid landscape mirrors the sense of isolation felt by the protagonist, Gogol, as he navigates his identity crisis in a foreign land. The relentless sun and vast sands are not mere descriptions; they are the silent witnesses to his inner turmoil.
On the other end of the literary spectrum, there is Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. The lush, vibrant Kerala backwaters are not just the setting; they are a character woven into the fabric of the story. The teeming, humid landscape reflects the complex web of human relationships and secrets that unravel in the narrative. This interplay is not confined to contemporary literature alone. In Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy Macbeth, the eerie and foreboding setting of the Scottish moors casts a dark shadow over the characters’ actions. The moors, shrouded in mist and mystery, serve as an ever-present omen of the impending tragedy. - The crisis of justice that is the subject matter of discussion in the media today is in fact the crisis of “justice for the middle class”. The main difference between India and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries is that whereas the middle class in these countries has reasonable access to justice, in India it does not. A vocal and powerful middle class has emerged in India since 1991. It is demanding reasonable access to justice. Much of the judicial reform effort will help meet this demand…
The question of justice for the poor is, however, an altogether different challenge. No country in the world has been able to secure justice for the poor. Most of the jails of the richest countries are filled with the poorest. The “masses” are more often victims of the criminal justice system than of crime. In India as well, jails are almost exclusively filled with the poor. The civil justice system is hardly accessible to them. They are often victimised by lawyers, touts and court staff. They are docket-excluded, a new type of untouchability. The language and the logic—and the colonial and feudal culture—of the judicial system are alien to them. It rarely takes cognisance of their needs and interests.
Their main concern, therefore, is to escape the attention of the justice system, criminal and civil. A landless Dalit person in the interior of Madhya Pradesh once gave me an insightful definition of a court from the perspective of the masses: “A court is a place where you are forcibly taken by the police to be punished; no one goes to a court.” In contrast, many lawyers and judges colloquially define a court as “a temple of justice where rights are protected”.
These sharply divergent visions mean that justice for one section is often injustice for another. Protecting the livelihood of traditional taxi and auto drivers from predatory pricing by corporate app-based taxi providers by imaginatively using the available tools of law to delay their incursion would be seen by the rich and by sections of the middle class as a failure of the judicial system, and possibly as also resulting in a downgrading of the “ease of doing business” measure. However, the masses would see such a judicial intervention as strong evidence of a good justice system. Although the conflict over competing visions of the nation and conflicting demands from social and economic segments have confined judicial reform of judicial administration mainly to “neutral” areas such as process reform, procedural law, technology, planning and court and case management, judge strength, and the workload of judges, there has been considerable improvement in these areas, and the judicial system has improved its performance.
[Extracted, with edits, from “Justice and the Two Ideas of India”, by G. Mohan Gopal, Frontline] - Everything she wanted was here, at Carignano, in Kasauli. Here, on the ridge of the mountain, in this quiet house. It was the place, and the time of life, that she had wanted and prepared for all her life-as she realized on the first day at Carignano, with a great, cool flowering of relief - and at last she had it. She wanted no one and nothing else. Whatever else came, or happened here, would be an unwelcome intrusion and distraction. This she tried to convey to the plodding postman with a cold and piercing stare from the height of the ridge onto his honest bull back. Unfortunately, he did not look up at her on the hilltop but stared stolidly down at the dust piling onto his shoes as he plodded on. A bullock-man, an oafish ox, she thought bitterly. She stepped backwards into the garden and the wind suddenly billowed up and threw the pine branches about as though to curtain her. She was grey, tall and thin and her silk sari made a sweeping, shivering sound and she fancied she could merge with the pine trees and be mistaken for one. To be a tree, no more and no less, was all she was prepared to undertake.
What pleased and satisfied her so, here at Carignano, was its barrenness. This was the chief virtue of all Kasauli of course-its starkness. It had rocks, it had pines, it had light and air. In every direction there was a sweeping view - to the north, of the mountains, to the south, of the plains. Occasionally an eagle swam through this clear unobstructed mass of light and air, that was all. And Carignano, her home on the ridge, had no more than that. Why should it? The sun shone on its white walls. Its windows were open the ones facing north opened on to the blue waves of the Himalayas flowing out and up to the line of ice and snow sketched upon the sky, while those that faced south looked down the plunging cliff to the plain stretching out, flat and sere to the blurred horizon.
Yes, there were some apricot trees close to the house. There were clumps of iris that had finished blooming. There was the kitchen with a wing of smoke lifting out of its chimney and a stack of wood outside its door. But these were incidental, almost unimportant.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “Fire on the Mountain” by Anita Desai] - English literature is a vast and diverse field that has left an indelible mark on the world of letters. From the eloquent plays of William Shakespeare to the complex novels of Jane Austen and the profound poetry of William Wordsworth, English literature offers a window into the human experience. One of the luminaries of English literature is William Shakespeare, often hailed as the greatest playwright in the history of English language. His works, including Hamlet, Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet, are celebrated for their exploration of human nature, love, ambition, and tragedy. His characters, such as the tormented Hamlet and the star-crossed lovers Romeo and Juliet, continue to captivate readers and audiences worldwide.
The 19th century ushered in a new era of literary giants. Jane Austen’s novels, such as Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility, provide incisive social commentary through the lens of wit and romance. Austen’s heroines, like Elizabeth Bennet and Elinor Dashwood, remain beloved literary figures known for their intelligence and resilience. The Romantic era brought forth poets like William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who celebrated * 8 UG the beauty of nature and the emotional intensity of the individual. Wordsworth’s ‘‘I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud’’ and Coleridge’s ‘‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’’ are testament to the power of the written words to evoke profound emotions and imagery. Moving towards 20th century, English literature continued to evolve. Virginia Woolf’s ground-breaking novel Mrs. Dalloway explored the inner thoughts and lives of its characters with a modernist narrative style. Dystopian visions, as seen in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four provided stark warnings about the dangers of totalitarianism and the erosion of individual freedom.
Today, English literature is a global phenomenon, transcending borders and languages. Indian authors like Arundhati Roy, with her novel The God of Small Things, have won prestigious international literary awards. The book not only explores intricate family dynamics but also delves into the broader socio-political landscape of India. In summary, English literature is a testament to the enduring power of storytelling and the written word. It encompasses an array of authors, themes, and styles that continue to captivate and inspire readers across the world. - On the evening of the 10th, General Dyer arrived at Amritsar, and the Deputy-Commissioner handed over the civil power to him. He issued a proclamation by word of mouth that no meetings should be held. Two days later, after there had been no sort of riot, nor murder, General Dyer heard that a meeting was to be held at the Jallianwala Bagh. He proceeded there with about fifty troops, half British, half Indian, and a certain number of Ghurkas, armed with their kukris. The Jallianwala Bagh is an open space, half a mile square, which has one entry wide enough for three persons. The troops got in and lined up on a mound of debris. The walls, seven feet high, and the surrounding houses enclosed the people. There were, too, three alleys through which the people might have been able to pass. Within thirty seconds of the troops getting in, General Dyer gave orders to fire, and the crowd of people, estimated at anything from 5,000 to 20,000, who were sitting on the ground peacefully listening to the mob oratory, were fired on. The result of the troops’ fire into the mass of people we do not know. But we do know that Dyer’s own estimate of the casualties resulting from ten minutes continual individual firing, was 400 to 500 killed and 1,500 wounded. The people were not able to escape. They were people who had not offered any violence and who had not been warned. These people were shot down. After ten minutes, the ammunition was exhausted and the troops marched off, and they left 1,500 wounded there. There were men lying there for two days, dying of thirst, eating the ground, bleeding to death and nobody to look after them. Those who lived nearby came and carried away some of the wounded from the heap of dead and dying, but the unfortunate country people died there miserably of their wounds. This is what is done in 1919 in British India…
Centuries hence you will find Indian children brought up to this spot, just as they visit now the Cawnpore Well, and you can imagine the feelings of these Indians for generations over this terrible business.
[Col. Wedgwood, MP, speaking in the British Parliament, 22 December 1919]
View More Questions