The problem consists of determining Rahim's speed in still water, given two statements. Let's evaluate each statement one by one to determine if it provides sufficient information to solve the problem.
Statement 1: The speed of the speedboat in still water is 30 km/hour.
This statement gives us information about the speedboat's speed in still water, but it does not provide any information about Rahim's speed or how it influences the time to intersect with the speedboat. Without knowing how the river's current affects both boats or how this relates to Rahim's speed, this statement alone is not sufficient to determine Rahim’s speed in still water.
Statement 2: Rahim takes three hours to reach point B from point A.
This statement provides the time Rahim takes to travel 30 km upstream. However, without knowing the river's current speed or any information about the relative speed of the speedboat, we cannot derive Rahim's speed in still water from this information alone.
Now, let's consider both statements together:
Using both statements, we can deduce Rahim's speed in still water because we now have the relative speeds set against a constant distance where both the current and Rahim's travel time are known. Thus, the correct answer is:
Both statements together are sufficient, but neither of them alone is sufficient.
Let the speeds be: \[ \text{Rahim’s speed} = R \ \text{kmph}, \quad \text{Speedboat (still water)} = S \ \text{kmph}, \quad \text{Stream speed} = W \ \text{kmph}. \] They cross each other at point \(X\).
From given conditions: \[ \frac{AX}{R - W} = \frac{5}{60}, \quad \frac{AX}{S - W} = \frac{4}{60}. \] Eliminating \(AX\): \[ W = 5R - 4S \quad \ldots (1) \]
Statement I: \(S = 30 \ \text{kmph}\). Since \(W\) or \(AX\) is not known, Statement I alone is not sufficient.
Statement II: \[ \frac{BA}{R + W} = \frac{3}{60} \ \text{hours}, \quad \text{or simply speed } (R+W)=3 \ \text{km/hr}. \] Since \(S\) or \(AX\) is not known, Statement II alone is not sufficient.
Combining I and II:
Substituting \(S = 30\) in (1): \[ W = 5R - 4(30) = 5R - 120 \] From Statement II: \[ R + W = 10 \quad \Rightarrow \quad W = 10 - R. \] Equating: \[ 10 - R = 5R - 120 \] \[ 6R = 130 \quad \Rightarrow \quad R = \tfrac{65}{3}. \]
Final Answer:
Both statements together are sufficient. Hence, the correct option is: \[ \boxed{D} \]
In the given figure, \( PQ \) and \( PR \) are tangents to the circle such that \( PQ = 7 \, \text{cm} \) and \( \angle RPQ = 60^\circ \).
The length of chord QR is:
In the given figure, a circle inscribed in \( \triangle ABC \) touches \( AB, BC, \) and \( CA \) at \( X, Z, \) and \( Y \) respectively.
If \( AB = 12 \, \text{cm}, AY = 8 \, \text{cm}, \) and \( CY = 6 \, \text{cm} \), then the length of \( BC \) is:
Two concentric circles are of radii $8\ \text{cm}$ and $5\ \text{cm}$. Find the length of the chord of the larger circle which touches (is tangent to) the smaller circle.