Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is an inference question. An inference is a conclusion that is strongly supported by the text, even if it is not stated directly.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The passage states that the new law has "led to protests from various industries that rely heavily on fossil fuels."
- (A) The law will have no impact on fossil fuel industries. This is directly contradicted by the text, as the industries are protesting due to the expected impact ("job losses and economic hardship").
- (B) The reduction in emissions will create new jobs in other sectors. The passage does not provide any information about job creation in other sectors. This cannot be inferred.
- (C) Industries relying on fossil fuels are resistant to the new law. The fact that these industries are "protesting" is direct evidence of their resistance to the law. This is a valid and strongly supported inference.
- (D) The new law was universally accepted. This is directly contradicted by the mention of "protests."
Step 3: Final Answer:
The passage provides clear evidence that certain industries are resisting the new law. This corresponds to option (C).