For a simply supported beam of span \( l \) with a single point load \( W \) at mid-span, the bending moment diagram is triangular, rising linearly from zero at each support to a peak value at the centre. Let's check which of the listed values is consistent with this peak.
- \( \dfrac{Wl}{2} \): This is twice the true peak moment. Using this value would imply a moment larger than what the support reactions and geometry actually produce at mid-span, over-estimating the true bending effect.
- \( \dfrac{Wl}{4} \): Each support reaction is \( \dfrac{W}{2} \), and the moment at the centre is this reaction multiplied by the distance to the centre, \( \dfrac{l}{2} \), giving \( \dfrac{W}{2}\times\dfrac{l}{2} = \dfrac{Wl}{4} \). This matches the standard triangular moment diagram for a central point load and is consistent with the support reactions found from equilibrium.
- \( Wl \): This value is four times too large; it would only arise if the entire load \( W \) acted at a distance \( l \) from a single support without any load sharing between two supports, which does not describe a simply supported beam.
- \( 2Wl \): This is eight times the correct peak value and does not correspond to any consistent equilibrium condition for a simply supported beam carrying a single central point load.
Only \( \dfrac{Wl}{4} \) is consistent with the reactions found from statics and the standard triangular bending moment diagram for this loading case.
Therefore, the correct answer is \( \dfrac{Wl}{4} \).