Step 1: Sentence 1 introduces the theme. "Mobility" is both geographical and social. So the next sentence must expand on how traditional social mobility studies treated society — this is sentence 2.
Step 2: Logical follow-up. After criticizing the older literature in (2), the author notes that even migration sociology is limited. This is sentence 3.
Step 3: Expanding concern. Then comes sentence 4, which broadens the scope to flows of people beyond societies (work, asylum, etc.).
Step 4: Transition to objects. Sentence 5 logically introduces the idea that not only people but also objects are mobile, which prepares the ground for sentence 6.
Step 5: Conclusion. Sentence 6 then emphasizes the "sociology of objects" and their intersection with people's flows, completing the passage. \[ \text{Final sequence: } 1 \; \to \; 2 \; \to \; 3 \; \to \; 4 \; \to \; 5 \; \to \; 6 \] Thus, the correct option is (B) 2, 3, 4, 5.
| a | Phileas Fogg and Jean Passepartout | i | William Shakespeare |
| b | Don Quixote and Sancho Panza | ii | Jules Verne |
| c | Candide and Pangloss | iii | Miguel de Cervantes |
| d | Dogberry and Verges | iv | Voltaire |
| a | Phileas Fogg and Jean Passepartout | i | William Shakespeare |
| b | Don Quixote and Sancho Panza | ii | Jules Verne |
| c | Candide and Pangloss | iii | Miguel de Cervantes |
| d | Dogberry and Verges | iv | Voltaire |