Step 1: Understanding the central claim of the passage.
The passage explicitly refers to a feminist insistence on the idea that “the personal is political”This phrase is historically and theoretically rooted in feminist thought, indicating that personal experiences are shaped by political and social structures
Step 2: Evaluating option (B).
The passage directly identifies “the personal is political” as a feminist insistenceThis clearly supports the conclusion that it is a feminist argumentTherefore, option (B) is correct
Step 3: Evaluating option (D).
The passage states that feminist academics insist the subjective element must not be excluded from research methods such as interviews or theories of knowledge productionThis directly supports the view that subjectivity can legitimately be part of research methodsHence, option (D) is correct
Step 4: Evaluating option (C).
The authors cited—Skeggs, Maynard, Purvis, and Reinhartz—are referenced in the context of feminist academic workTheir citation within feminist methodological debates allows us to reasonably conclude that they are feminist scholarsThus, option (C) is correct
Step 5: Evaluating option (A).
Option (A) is incorrect because the passage does not deny interviews or theories of knowledge production as research methodsInstead, it argues that subjectivity should not be excluded from them
Step 6: Final conclusion.
Based on the passage, the correct conclusions are (B), (C), and (D)