Comprehension
The Contract Act 1872 deals with contract law in India, its rights, duties, and exceptions arising out of it. Section 2(h) of the Act gives us the definition of a contract, which is simply an agreement enforceable by law. To understand the difference between void agreements and voidable contracts it is important to talk about sections 2(h), 2(a). 20), 2(d), 14, 16 (3) and 15,24-28 of the Indian Contact Act. Void agreements are fundamentally invalid making them unenforceable by default. These agreements cannot be fulfilled as they consist of illegal elements, and they cannot be enforced even after subjecting it to both parties. However, in the case of voidable contract, the agreement is initially enforceable, but it is later on denied at the option of either of the parties due to various reasons.
Unless rejected by a party, this contract will remain valid and enforceable. The party who is at the disadvantage due to any circumstance applicable to the contract has the ability to render the agreement void. A void agreement is void ab initio making it impossible to rectify any defects in it while voidable contracts can be rectified. In case of a void agreement, neither of the parties is subject to any compensation for any losses but voidable contracts have some remedies.
A valid agreement forms a contract that may again be either valid or voidable. The primary difference between a void agreement and voidable contract is that a void agreement cannot be converted into a contract.
(Extracted with edits from A Comparative Study of Voidable Contracts and Void Agreements)
Unless rejected by a party, this contract will remain valid and enforceable. The party who is at the disadvantage due to any circumstance applicable to the contract has the ability to render the agreement void. A void agreement is void ab initio making it impossible to rectify any defects in it while voidable contracts can be rectified. In case of a void agreement, neither of the parties is subject to any compensation for any losses but voidable contracts have some remedies.
A valid agreement forms a contract that may again be either valid or voidable. The primary difference between a void agreement and voidable contract is that a void agreement cannot be converted into a contract.
(Extracted with edits from A Comparative Study of Voidable Contracts and Void Agreements)
Question: 1
Which of the following best describes a void agreement?
Which of the following best describes a void agreement?
Updated On: Sep 10, 2025
- An agreement that is valid until declared invalid by a court
- An agreement that has no legal effect from the beginning
- An agreement that is legally enforceable
- An agreement that can be enforced if one party chooses to do so
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Solution and Explanation
A void agreement is defined as an agreement that has no legal effect from the beginning. This means it is considered invalid from its outset and cannot be enforced in any court of law. According to the Indian Contract Act, 1872, void agreements are fundamentally flawed, often due to illegal elements, making them unenforceable by default. In contrast, a voidable contract is initially valid and enforceable but may be annulled by one party if certain conditions are met.
The Contract Act outlines the nature of such agreements and contracts:
- Section 2(h) defines a contract as an agreement enforceable by law.
- A valid agreement forms the basis of a contract, which might be valid or voidable.
- However, a void agreement cannot be converted into a contract as it lacks essential legal standing.
In essence, the main characteristic of a void agreement is its inherent lack of legal effect from inception, distinguishing it from voidable contracts or valid agreements.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
A contract between two parties to rob a bank and share the proceeds equally can be termed as:
A contract between two parties to rob a bank and share the proceeds equally can be termed as:
Updated On: Sep 10, 2025
- Void Contract
- Valid Contract
- Voidable Contract
- Legally Enforceable Contract
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
In legal studies, it's crucial to understand different types of contracts as per the Contract Act 1872. The options provided relate to the nature of a contractual agreement between two parties planning to engage in illegal activities, such as robbing a bank.
A contract is defined in Section 2(h) as an agreement enforceable by law. For an agreement to be a valid contract, it should not involve illegal actions or purposes. Here's why a contract to rob a bank is considered a 'void contract':
- Void Contract: According to the Act, a void contract consists of agreements that are fundamentally invalid due to illegal components. Robbing a bank is illegal, making any agreement regarding it unenforceable by law, hence void.
- Valid Contract: This requires legality of purpose, which is absent in this scenario as robbing a bank is illegal.
- Voidable Contract: Such contracts are initially valid but can become void at the discretion of one party. However, they start with legality, unlike a robbery agreement.
- Legally Enforceable Contract: Necessitates lawful actions, which clearly isn't applicable to illegal endeavors.
Based on these explanations, the agreement to rob a bank is a 'Void Contract' as it involves illegal activity.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
An agreement made by an adult but involving a minor child where the signatory is a minor child himself, this agreement would be:
An agreement made by an adult but involving a minor child where the signatory is a minor child himself, this agreement would be:
Updated On: Sep 10, 2025
- A valid and enforceable agreement
- A voidable agreement
- A void agreement
- An agreement that cannot be enforced by the minor
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
To determine the nature of the agreement made by an adult but involving a minor where the signatory is a minor child himself, we can analyze it under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. According to Section 2(h) of the Act, a contract is an agreement enforceable by law. However, agreements involving minors have specific considerations.
Key points from the Indian Contract Act:
- A "void agreement" is an agreement that is not enforceable by law and is considered never to have existed (void ab initio).
- A "voidable contract" is initially valid and enforceable but can be declared void at the discretion of one party.
Given the comprehension from the Act, an agreement signed by a minor and involving them is a "void agreement" because:
- Minors lack the legal capacity to enter into agreements enforceable by law.
- Such agreements cannot be rectified or enforced even when involving adult parties.
Thus, the agreement described would be classified as:
A void agreement
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4
Which of the following scenarios would most likely result in a void agreement?
Which of the following scenarios would most likely result in a void agreement?
Updated On: Sep 10, 2025
- An agreement signed by someone under duress
- A contract with mutually agreed terms to sell a house
- An agreement to pay 10 lakhs on getting a government job
- A contract with a minor who understands the terms
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
To determine which scenario would most likely result in a void agreement, we need to analyze the options based on the principles outlined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Understanding Void Agreements: A void agreement is one that cannot be enforced by law due to missing elements required for a valid contract. Such agreements are "void ab initio," meaning they are invalid from the start and cannot be remedied or enforced.
| Scenario | Analysis | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| An agreement signed by someone under duress | This scenario describes a voidable contract, not a void agreement. The contract is enforceable unless the disadvantaged party chooses to void it. | Voidable, not void |
| A contract with mutually agreed terms to sell a house | This represents a valid contract. It is enforceable by law with no fundamental illegal elements. | Valid |
| An agreement to pay 10 lakhs on getting a government job | This is likely a void agreement because it involves an agreement that lacks lawful consideration. Consideration based on obtaining a government job is illegal. | Void |
| A contract with a minor who understands the terms | Contracts with minors are generally considered void, as minors lack the capacity to contract. | Void |
Conclusion: The scenario "An agreement to pay 10 lakhs on getting a government job" is most likely a void agreement, as it involves unlawful consideration which cannot form the basis of a legal contract, thus rendering it unenforceable by law.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5
An agreement made without consideration is generally:
An agreement made without consideration is generally:
Updated On: Sep 10, 2025
- Valid agreement
- Enforceable agreement
- Void agreement
- Voidable agreement
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
To determine the nature of an agreement made without consideration, we must examine the principles outlined in the Indian Contract Act, 1872. According to Section 2(h) of the Act, a contract is defined as "an agreement enforceable by law." This implies that for an agreement to qualify as a contract, it must possess certain essential elements, one of which is consideration.
Consideration is defined in Section 2(d) of the Act. It refers to something of value exchanged between the parties as part of a contractual agreement. It’s essential because it signifies that both parties intend to enter into an enforceable agreement, thus establishing a mutual consent requirement. The absence of this component renders the agreement void, underlining its critical role in contract formation.
Regarding the options provided:
- Valid agreement: This is incorrect because an agreement without consideration does not meet the necessary criteria outlined in the Act and thus cannot be valid.
- Enforceable agreement: Also incorrect, as enforceability under law requires all elements of a contract, including consideration, to be present.
- Void agreement: Correct. A void agreement is legally unenforceable due to the absence of its essential components, such as consideration. Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act states that an agreement without consideration is void unless it falls under specific exceptions.
- Voidable agreement: Not applicable in this context. A voidable agreement is initially valid until annulled by one of the parties due to reasons like coercion or fraud, but it always requires valid consideration at its inception.
Therefore, under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an agreement made without consideration is generally a void agreement.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top CLAT Questions
- In the realm of contemporary literature, the interplay between character and setting is a nuanced dance that shapes the narrative’s essence. The setting, often described with painstaking detail, becomes more than a backdrop; it becomes a character, influencing the plot and character development.
Consider, for instance, the barren expanse of the desert in Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake. The arid landscape mirrors the sense of isolation felt by the protagonist, Gogol, as he navigates his identity crisis in a foreign land. The relentless sun and vast sands are not mere descriptions; they are the silent witnesses to his inner turmoil.
On the other end of the literary spectrum, there is Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. The lush, vibrant Kerala backwaters are not just the setting; they are a character woven into the fabric of the story. The teeming, humid landscape reflects the complex web of human relationships and secrets that unravel in the narrative. This interplay is not confined to contemporary literature alone. In Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy Macbeth, the eerie and foreboding setting of the Scottish moors casts a dark shadow over the characters’ actions. The moors, shrouded in mist and mystery, serve as an ever-present omen of the impending tragedy. - The crisis of justice that is the subject matter of discussion in the media today is in fact the crisis of “justice for the middle class”. The main difference between India and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries is that whereas the middle class in these countries has reasonable access to justice, in India it does not. A vocal and powerful middle class has emerged in India since 1991. It is demanding reasonable access to justice. Much of the judicial reform effort will help meet this demand…
The question of justice for the poor is, however, an altogether different challenge. No country in the world has been able to secure justice for the poor. Most of the jails of the richest countries are filled with the poorest. The “masses” are more often victims of the criminal justice system than of crime. In India as well, jails are almost exclusively filled with the poor. The civil justice system is hardly accessible to them. They are often victimised by lawyers, touts and court staff. They are docket-excluded, a new type of untouchability. The language and the logic—and the colonial and feudal culture—of the judicial system are alien to them. It rarely takes cognisance of their needs and interests.
Their main concern, therefore, is to escape the attention of the justice system, criminal and civil. A landless Dalit person in the interior of Madhya Pradesh once gave me an insightful definition of a court from the perspective of the masses: “A court is a place where you are forcibly taken by the police to be punished; no one goes to a court.” In contrast, many lawyers and judges colloquially define a court as “a temple of justice where rights are protected”.
These sharply divergent visions mean that justice for one section is often injustice for another. Protecting the livelihood of traditional taxi and auto drivers from predatory pricing by corporate app-based taxi providers by imaginatively using the available tools of law to delay their incursion would be seen by the rich and by sections of the middle class as a failure of the judicial system, and possibly as also resulting in a downgrading of the “ease of doing business” measure. However, the masses would see such a judicial intervention as strong evidence of a good justice system. Although the conflict over competing visions of the nation and conflicting demands from social and economic segments have confined judicial reform of judicial administration mainly to “neutral” areas such as process reform, procedural law, technology, planning and court and case management, judge strength, and the workload of judges, there has been considerable improvement in these areas, and the judicial system has improved its performance.
[Extracted, with edits, from “Justice and the Two Ideas of India”, by G. Mohan Gopal, Frontline] - Everything she wanted was here, at Carignano, in Kasauli. Here, on the ridge of the mountain, in this quiet house. It was the place, and the time of life, that she had wanted and prepared for all her life-as she realized on the first day at Carignano, with a great, cool flowering of relief - and at last she had it. She wanted no one and nothing else. Whatever else came, or happened here, would be an unwelcome intrusion and distraction. This she tried to convey to the plodding postman with a cold and piercing stare from the height of the ridge onto his honest bull back. Unfortunately, he did not look up at her on the hilltop but stared stolidly down at the dust piling onto his shoes as he plodded on. A bullock-man, an oafish ox, she thought bitterly. She stepped backwards into the garden and the wind suddenly billowed up and threw the pine branches about as though to curtain her. She was grey, tall and thin and her silk sari made a sweeping, shivering sound and she fancied she could merge with the pine trees and be mistaken for one. To be a tree, no more and no less, was all she was prepared to undertake.
What pleased and satisfied her so, here at Carignano, was its barrenness. This was the chief virtue of all Kasauli of course-its starkness. It had rocks, it had pines, it had light and air. In every direction there was a sweeping view - to the north, of the mountains, to the south, of the plains. Occasionally an eagle swam through this clear unobstructed mass of light and air, that was all. And Carignano, her home on the ridge, had no more than that. Why should it? The sun shone on its white walls. Its windows were open the ones facing north opened on to the blue waves of the Himalayas flowing out and up to the line of ice and snow sketched upon the sky, while those that faced south looked down the plunging cliff to the plain stretching out, flat and sere to the blurred horizon.
Yes, there were some apricot trees close to the house. There were clumps of iris that had finished blooming. There was the kitchen with a wing of smoke lifting out of its chimney and a stack of wood outside its door. But these were incidental, almost unimportant.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “Fire on the Mountain” by Anita Desai] - English literature is a vast and diverse field that has left an indelible mark on the world of letters. From the eloquent plays of William Shakespeare to the complex novels of Jane Austen and the profound poetry of William Wordsworth, English literature offers a window into the human experience. One of the luminaries of English literature is William Shakespeare, often hailed as the greatest playwright in the history of English language. His works, including Hamlet, Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet, are celebrated for their exploration of human nature, love, ambition, and tragedy. His characters, such as the tormented Hamlet and the star-crossed lovers Romeo and Juliet, continue to captivate readers and audiences worldwide.
The 19th century ushered in a new era of literary giants. Jane Austen’s novels, such as Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility, provide incisive social commentary through the lens of wit and romance. Austen’s heroines, like Elizabeth Bennet and Elinor Dashwood, remain beloved literary figures known for their intelligence and resilience. The Romantic era brought forth poets like William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who celebrated * 8 UG the beauty of nature and the emotional intensity of the individual. Wordsworth’s ‘‘I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud’’ and Coleridge’s ‘‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’’ are testament to the power of the written words to evoke profound emotions and imagery. Moving towards 20th century, English literature continued to evolve. Virginia Woolf’s ground-breaking novel Mrs. Dalloway explored the inner thoughts and lives of its characters with a modernist narrative style. Dystopian visions, as seen in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four provided stark warnings about the dangers of totalitarianism and the erosion of individual freedom.
Today, English literature is a global phenomenon, transcending borders and languages. Indian authors like Arundhati Roy, with her novel The God of Small Things, have won prestigious international literary awards. The book not only explores intricate family dynamics but also delves into the broader socio-political landscape of India. In summary, English literature is a testament to the enduring power of storytelling and the written word. It encompasses an array of authors, themes, and styles that continue to captivate and inspire readers across the world. - On the evening of the 10th, General Dyer arrived at Amritsar, and the Deputy-Commissioner handed over the civil power to him. He issued a proclamation by word of mouth that no meetings should be held. Two days later, after there had been no sort of riot, nor murder, General Dyer heard that a meeting was to be held at the Jallianwala Bagh. He proceeded there with about fifty troops, half British, half Indian, and a certain number of Ghurkas, armed with their kukris. The Jallianwala Bagh is an open space, half a mile square, which has one entry wide enough for three persons. The troops got in and lined up on a mound of debris. The walls, seven feet high, and the surrounding houses enclosed the people. There were, too, three alleys through which the people might have been able to pass. Within thirty seconds of the troops getting in, General Dyer gave orders to fire, and the crowd of people, estimated at anything from 5,000 to 20,000, who were sitting on the ground peacefully listening to the mob oratory, were fired on. The result of the troops’ fire into the mass of people we do not know. But we do know that Dyer’s own estimate of the casualties resulting from ten minutes continual individual firing, was 400 to 500 killed and 1,500 wounded. The people were not able to escape. They were people who had not offered any violence and who had not been warned. These people were shot down. After ten minutes, the ammunition was exhausted and the troops marched off, and they left 1,500 wounded there. There were men lying there for two days, dying of thirst, eating the ground, bleeding to death and nobody to look after them. Those who lived nearby came and carried away some of the wounded from the heap of dead and dying, but the unfortunate country people died there miserably of their wounds. This is what is done in 1919 in British India…
Centuries hence you will find Indian children brought up to this spot, just as they visit now the Cawnpore Well, and you can imagine the feelings of these Indians for generations over this terrible business.
[Col. Wedgwood, MP, speaking in the British Parliament, 22 December 1919]
View More Questions