The capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor follows \( C = \dfrac{\epsilon_0 A}{d} \), where \(A\) is the plate area and \(d\) is the plate separation. Here the linear dimension of the plates is doubled, so since area scales with the square of a linear dimension, the new area becomes \(A^{\prime} = (2)^2 A = 4A\). The separation is increased to 4 times, so \(d' = 4d\). Substituting these directly:
\[ C^{\prime} = \frac{\epsilon_0 (4A)}{4d} = \frac{\epsilon_0 A}{d} = C \]
Checking this result against each option below shows why only one value is consistent with this substitution.
- 100μF: This would only follow if the area were scaled by a factor of 4 while the separation were left unchanged, but the question explicitly increases the separation too, so this ignores half the given information.
- 25μF: This would follow if the separation were increased 4 times while the area were mistakenly left unchanged, producing a net decrease rather than the actual unchanged ratio.
- 50μF: This is exactly what the substitution above produces: since area increases by a factor of 4 (from doubling a linear dimension) and separation also increases by a factor of 4, the two effects cancel and capacitance stays exactly as it was.
- 200μF: This would require area to increase by a factor of 4 while separation somehow decreased, the opposite of what happens when separation is quadrupled, so it doesn't match the given conditions.
The area-scaling and separation-scaling effects exactly cancel each other out in this problem, leaving the capacitance unchanged.
Therefore, the correct answer is 50μF.