Comprehension
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act 1976 introduced the concept of environmental protection in an explicit manner into the Constitution through introduction of Article 48-A and Article 51-A (g). In many judgments, the Supreme Court ruled that both the state and its residents have a fundamental duty to preserve and protect their natural resources. The recent judgment obliquely makes way for an enforceable right, and a potential obligation on the state unless the same is overturned by an Act of Parliament.
India is signatory of various international environmental conservation treaties under which India has the binding commitment to reduce carbon emission. During the COP 21. India signed Paris Agreement along with 196 countries, under which universally binding agreement was made to limit greenhouse gas emission to levels that would prevent global temperatures from increasing to more than 1.5 degree Celsius before the industrial revolution. India has committed to generating 50% of its energy through renewable resources and will generate 500 GW of energy from non-fossil fuels by 2030, reducing the carbon emission by 1 billion ton. Additionally, India has committed to achieve net zero carbon emission target by 2070.
Supreme Court's March 21, 2024 verdict builds on the bulwark of jurisprudence in place since 1986, and, through various other judgments, the Supreme Court has recognised the right to clean environment along with right to clean air, water and soil free from pollution which is absolutely necessary for the enjoyment of life. Any disturbance with these basic elements of environment would amount to violation of Article 21. It also establishes duty of the state to maintain ecological balance and hygienic environment. Although right to clean environment has existed; by recognizing the right against climate change it shall compel the states to prioritize environmental protection and sustainable development.
(Extracted, with edits and revision, from "Supreme Court of India bolts Right to Life with climate justice", The Economic Times, 06-05-2024)
India is signatory of various international environmental conservation treaties under which India has the binding commitment to reduce carbon emission. During the COP 21. India signed Paris Agreement along with 196 countries, under which universally binding agreement was made to limit greenhouse gas emission to levels that would prevent global temperatures from increasing to more than 1.5 degree Celsius before the industrial revolution. India has committed to generating 50% of its energy through renewable resources and will generate 500 GW of energy from non-fossil fuels by 2030, reducing the carbon emission by 1 billion ton. Additionally, India has committed to achieve net zero carbon emission target by 2070.
Supreme Court's March 21, 2024 verdict builds on the bulwark of jurisprudence in place since 1986, and, through various other judgments, the Supreme Court has recognised the right to clean environment along with right to clean air, water and soil free from pollution which is absolutely necessary for the enjoyment of life. Any disturbance with these basic elements of environment would amount to violation of Article 21. It also establishes duty of the state to maintain ecological balance and hygienic environment. Although right to clean environment has existed; by recognizing the right against climate change it shall compel the states to prioritize environmental protection and sustainable development.
(Extracted, with edits and revision, from "Supreme Court of India bolts Right to Life with climate justice", The Economic Times, 06-05-2024)
Question: 1
In which among the following, changes were introduced for environmental protection through the Constitution of India (42nd Amendment Act)?
In which among the following, changes were introduced for environmental protection through the Constitution of India (42nd Amendment Act)?
Updated On: Sep 10, 2025
- Fundamental Rights
- Fundamental Duties
- Directive Principles of State Policy
- 2, 3 only
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
The 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 introduced key changes for environmental protection in the Indian Constitution. It added:
- Fundamental Duties: Article 51-A (g) was introduced, marking it a duty of every citizen to protect and improve the natural environment.
- Directive Principles of State Policy: Article 48-A was added to direct the State to protect and improve the environment as well as safeguard forests and wildlife.
Thus, the changes were made under both Fundamental Duties and Directive Principles of State Policy. In the context of the question, the correct option highlighting the change for environmental protection introduced through the 42nd Amendment Act is Directive Principles of State Policy.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
The nature of binding commitment of India to reduce carbon emission through the signing of various international environmental conservation treaties especially the Paris Agreement shall be described as:
The nature of binding commitment of India to reduce carbon emission through the signing of various international environmental conservation treaties especially the Paris Agreement shall be described as:
Updated On: Sep 10, 2025
- The signatory may take adequate measures to reduce carbon emission
- The signatory may take inadequate measures to reduce carbon emission
- The signatory should explore the possibility to reduce carbon emission
- The signatory may formulate necessary policies to reduce carbon emission
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
To understand the nature of India's binding commitment to reduce carbon emissions through international treaties like the Paris Agreement, it's essential to comprehend India's obligations and legal context. The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 specifically incorporated environmental protection into the Constitution via Article 48-A and Article 51-A (g). The Indian Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that both state and citizens have a fundamental duty to protect natural resources.
During COP 21, India was among 196 countries to sign the Paris Agreement, committing to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Key objectives include generating 50% of energy from renewable sources, producing 500 GW from non-fossil fuels by 2030, and reducing carbon emissions by one billion tons. The Supreme Court's decision further enforces the right to a clean environment, aligning with Article 21 which guarantees the right to life, thus inferring a responsibility to maintain ecological balance.
Given this legal foundation and international commitment, the statement that best describes India's binding commitment is: The signatory may take adequate measures to reduce carbon emission. This reflects India's active and significant obligation to engage in measures that meaningfully address carbon emissions.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
Under Article 51-A(g) of the Indian Constitution, it is specifically mentioned that citizens shall have the duty to protect and improve the natural environment that includes:
Under Article 51-A(g) of the Indian Constitution, it is specifically mentioned that citizens shall have the duty to protect and improve the natural environment that includes:
Updated On: Sep 10, 2025
- Rivers & Lakes
- Forests & Wildlife
- All living creatures
- Only (A) and (B)
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Under Article 51-A(g) of the Indian Constitution, it is explicitly mentioned that it is the duty of every citizen to protect and improve the natural environment. This includes diverse components of the environment that are crucial for maintaining ecological balance. According to the options provided, the following are included:
- Rivers & Lakes: These water bodies are significant for biodiversity, ecological balance, and serve as sources of water for various purposes ranging from domestic to industrial use.
- Forests & Wildlife: Forests are essential for carbon sequestration, oxygen production, and biodiversity conservation. Wildlife is equally important for maintaining natural ecosystems.
The duties outlined in Article 51-A(g) extend to protecting these features of the environment, among others, but it specifically calls out rivers, lakes, forests, and wildlife.
Given these explanations, the correct answer to what is explicitly mentioned in Article 51-A(g) is:
Only (A) and (B)Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4
As per the aforementioned passage and decision of the Supreme Court,
As per the aforementioned passage and decision of the Supreme Court,
Updated On: Sep 10, 2025
- The fundamental duty to preserve and protect natural resources is upon the State only
- Citizens have the fundamental duty to preserve and protect natural resources
- Both the state and citizens have the duty to preserve and protect natural resources
- Citizen’s duty to maintain ecological balance and citizens’ right against climate change
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
The question is centered on the fundamental duty regarding the preservation and protection of natural resources as interpreted by the Supreme Court in India. The comprehension provided gives an overview of how environmental protection is integrated into the Indian Constitution, mainly through Articles 48-A and 51-A (g), and acknowledges the Supreme Court's stance on this matter.
The comprehension specifies that the Court's judgments have ruled that both the state and its citizens share the responsibility to safeguard natural resources. This is further solidified by statements about the state's duty to maintain ecological balance and the citizens' right to a clean environment.
Analyzing the answer options given:
| Option | Description |
|---|---|
| The fundamental duty to preserve and protect natural resources is upon the State only | Incorrect, as the duty is shared with citizens. |
| Citizens have the fundamental duty to preserve and protect natural resources | Incomplete, as the state also has this duty. |
| Both the state and citizens have the duty to preserve and protect natural resources | Correct, aligns with the Supreme Court's interpretation and constitutional provisions. |
| Citizen’s duty to maintain ecological balance and citizens’ right against climate change | Partially true but does not emphasize the state's responsibility. |
Thus, the correct answer is: Both the state and citizens have the duty to preserve and protect natural resources, as this reflects the shared responsibility emphasized by the Supreme Court and the Indian Constitution.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5
According to the passage, what makes India commit to reduce carbon emission?
According to the passage, what makes India commit to reduce carbon emission?
Updated On: Sep 10, 2025
- Because of being a signatory of Indian national environmental conservation policies
- Because of the Supreme Court verdicts which explicitly make way for an enforceable right
- Because of the policy decisions of Government
- Because of the Constitution of India (42nd Amendment Act)
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
The reason India is committed to reducing carbon emissions is primarily due to its status as a signatory of various international environmental conservation policies. As mentioned in the passage, India is part of numerous international treaties related to environmental conservation, which includes commitments to limit carbon emissions. Notably, India signed the Paris Agreement during COP 21 along with 196 countries. This agreement enforces universally binding commitments to keep global temperature rise well below 1.5 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels.
India's commitment involves increasing the share of renewable energy sources to 50% and generating 500 GW of energy from non-fossil fuels by 2030. Additionally, there is a goal of reducing carbon emissions by 1 billion tons and achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2070. These commitments are indicative of India's adherence to international environmental policies rather than domestic constitutional amendments, Supreme Court verdicts, or purely national governmental policies.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 6
The passage mentions that “any defiance with these basic amends of environment would amount to violation of Article 21”. Article 21 of the Constitution deals with:
The passage mentions that “any defiance with these basic amends of environment would amount to violation of Article 21”. Article 21 of the Constitution deals with:
Updated On: Sep 10, 2025
- Right to equality
- Right against exploitation
- Right to freedom of residence
- Right to life and personal liberty
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
The passage discusses the fundamental relationship between environmental protection and constitutional rights in India, specifically mentioning that any violation of essential environmental elements would equate to a violation of Article 21. The Supreme Court has supported this interpretation by recognizing the right to a clean environment as an extension of the right to life. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution states:
Article 21 - Protection of Life and Personal Liberty: "No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law."
This article ensures the right to life and personal liberty, a cornerstone of the Indian legal system. The association made in the passage refers to how environmental degradation may infringe upon these rights, emphasizing the state's duty to maintain ecological balance. Therefore, the correct answer to the question posed is "Right to life and personal liberty".
Article 21 - Protection of Life and Personal Liberty: "No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law."
This article ensures the right to life and personal liberty, a cornerstone of the Indian legal system. The association made in the passage refers to how environmental degradation may infringe upon these rights, emphasizing the state's duty to maintain ecological balance. Therefore, the correct answer to the question posed is "Right to life and personal liberty".
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top CLAT Questions
- In the realm of contemporary literature, the interplay between character and setting is a nuanced dance that shapes the narrative’s essence. The setting, often described with painstaking detail, becomes more than a backdrop; it becomes a character, influencing the plot and character development.
Consider, for instance, the barren expanse of the desert in Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake. The arid landscape mirrors the sense of isolation felt by the protagonist, Gogol, as he navigates his identity crisis in a foreign land. The relentless sun and vast sands are not mere descriptions; they are the silent witnesses to his inner turmoil.
On the other end of the literary spectrum, there is Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. The lush, vibrant Kerala backwaters are not just the setting; they are a character woven into the fabric of the story. The teeming, humid landscape reflects the complex web of human relationships and secrets that unravel in the narrative. This interplay is not confined to contemporary literature alone. In Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy Macbeth, the eerie and foreboding setting of the Scottish moors casts a dark shadow over the characters’ actions. The moors, shrouded in mist and mystery, serve as an ever-present omen of the impending tragedy. - The crisis of justice that is the subject matter of discussion in the media today is in fact the crisis of “justice for the middle class”. The main difference between India and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries is that whereas the middle class in these countries has reasonable access to justice, in India it does not. A vocal and powerful middle class has emerged in India since 1991. It is demanding reasonable access to justice. Much of the judicial reform effort will help meet this demand…
The question of justice for the poor is, however, an altogether different challenge. No country in the world has been able to secure justice for the poor. Most of the jails of the richest countries are filled with the poorest. The “masses” are more often victims of the criminal justice system than of crime. In India as well, jails are almost exclusively filled with the poor. The civil justice system is hardly accessible to them. They are often victimised by lawyers, touts and court staff. They are docket-excluded, a new type of untouchability. The language and the logic—and the colonial and feudal culture—of the judicial system are alien to them. It rarely takes cognisance of their needs and interests.
Their main concern, therefore, is to escape the attention of the justice system, criminal and civil. A landless Dalit person in the interior of Madhya Pradesh once gave me an insightful definition of a court from the perspective of the masses: “A court is a place where you are forcibly taken by the police to be punished; no one goes to a court.” In contrast, many lawyers and judges colloquially define a court as “a temple of justice where rights are protected”.
These sharply divergent visions mean that justice for one section is often injustice for another. Protecting the livelihood of traditional taxi and auto drivers from predatory pricing by corporate app-based taxi providers by imaginatively using the available tools of law to delay their incursion would be seen by the rich and by sections of the middle class as a failure of the judicial system, and possibly as also resulting in a downgrading of the “ease of doing business” measure. However, the masses would see such a judicial intervention as strong evidence of a good justice system. Although the conflict over competing visions of the nation and conflicting demands from social and economic segments have confined judicial reform of judicial administration mainly to “neutral” areas such as process reform, procedural law, technology, planning and court and case management, judge strength, and the workload of judges, there has been considerable improvement in these areas, and the judicial system has improved its performance.
[Extracted, with edits, from “Justice and the Two Ideas of India”, by G. Mohan Gopal, Frontline] - Everything she wanted was here, at Carignano, in Kasauli. Here, on the ridge of the mountain, in this quiet house. It was the place, and the time of life, that she had wanted and prepared for all her life-as she realized on the first day at Carignano, with a great, cool flowering of relief - and at last she had it. She wanted no one and nothing else. Whatever else came, or happened here, would be an unwelcome intrusion and distraction. This she tried to convey to the plodding postman with a cold and piercing stare from the height of the ridge onto his honest bull back. Unfortunately, he did not look up at her on the hilltop but stared stolidly down at the dust piling onto his shoes as he plodded on. A bullock-man, an oafish ox, she thought bitterly. She stepped backwards into the garden and the wind suddenly billowed up and threw the pine branches about as though to curtain her. She was grey, tall and thin and her silk sari made a sweeping, shivering sound and she fancied she could merge with the pine trees and be mistaken for one. To be a tree, no more and no less, was all she was prepared to undertake.
What pleased and satisfied her so, here at Carignano, was its barrenness. This was the chief virtue of all Kasauli of course-its starkness. It had rocks, it had pines, it had light and air. In every direction there was a sweeping view - to the north, of the mountains, to the south, of the plains. Occasionally an eagle swam through this clear unobstructed mass of light and air, that was all. And Carignano, her home on the ridge, had no more than that. Why should it? The sun shone on its white walls. Its windows were open the ones facing north opened on to the blue waves of the Himalayas flowing out and up to the line of ice and snow sketched upon the sky, while those that faced south looked down the plunging cliff to the plain stretching out, flat and sere to the blurred horizon.
Yes, there were some apricot trees close to the house. There were clumps of iris that had finished blooming. There was the kitchen with a wing of smoke lifting out of its chimney and a stack of wood outside its door. But these were incidental, almost unimportant.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “Fire on the Mountain” by Anita Desai] - English literature is a vast and diverse field that has left an indelible mark on the world of letters. From the eloquent plays of William Shakespeare to the complex novels of Jane Austen and the profound poetry of William Wordsworth, English literature offers a window into the human experience. One of the luminaries of English literature is William Shakespeare, often hailed as the greatest playwright in the history of English language. His works, including Hamlet, Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet, are celebrated for their exploration of human nature, love, ambition, and tragedy. His characters, such as the tormented Hamlet and the star-crossed lovers Romeo and Juliet, continue to captivate readers and audiences worldwide.
The 19th century ushered in a new era of literary giants. Jane Austen’s novels, such as Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility, provide incisive social commentary through the lens of wit and romance. Austen’s heroines, like Elizabeth Bennet and Elinor Dashwood, remain beloved literary figures known for their intelligence and resilience. The Romantic era brought forth poets like William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who celebrated * 8 UG the beauty of nature and the emotional intensity of the individual. Wordsworth’s ‘‘I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud’’ and Coleridge’s ‘‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’’ are testament to the power of the written words to evoke profound emotions and imagery. Moving towards 20th century, English literature continued to evolve. Virginia Woolf’s ground-breaking novel Mrs. Dalloway explored the inner thoughts and lives of its characters with a modernist narrative style. Dystopian visions, as seen in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four provided stark warnings about the dangers of totalitarianism and the erosion of individual freedom.
Today, English literature is a global phenomenon, transcending borders and languages. Indian authors like Arundhati Roy, with her novel The God of Small Things, have won prestigious international literary awards. The book not only explores intricate family dynamics but also delves into the broader socio-political landscape of India. In summary, English literature is a testament to the enduring power of storytelling and the written word. It encompasses an array of authors, themes, and styles that continue to captivate and inspire readers across the world. - On the evening of the 10th, General Dyer arrived at Amritsar, and the Deputy-Commissioner handed over the civil power to him. He issued a proclamation by word of mouth that no meetings should be held. Two days later, after there had been no sort of riot, nor murder, General Dyer heard that a meeting was to be held at the Jallianwala Bagh. He proceeded there with about fifty troops, half British, half Indian, and a certain number of Ghurkas, armed with their kukris. The Jallianwala Bagh is an open space, half a mile square, which has one entry wide enough for three persons. The troops got in and lined up on a mound of debris. The walls, seven feet high, and the surrounding houses enclosed the people. There were, too, three alleys through which the people might have been able to pass. Within thirty seconds of the troops getting in, General Dyer gave orders to fire, and the crowd of people, estimated at anything from 5,000 to 20,000, who were sitting on the ground peacefully listening to the mob oratory, were fired on. The result of the troops’ fire into the mass of people we do not know. But we do know that Dyer’s own estimate of the casualties resulting from ten minutes continual individual firing, was 400 to 500 killed and 1,500 wounded. The people were not able to escape. They were people who had not offered any violence and who had not been warned. These people were shot down. After ten minutes, the ammunition was exhausted and the troops marched off, and they left 1,500 wounded there. There were men lying there for two days, dying of thirst, eating the ground, bleeding to death and nobody to look after them. Those who lived nearby came and carried away some of the wounded from the heap of dead and dying, but the unfortunate country people died there miserably of their wounds. This is what is done in 1919 in British India…
Centuries hence you will find Indian children brought up to this spot, just as they visit now the Cawnpore Well, and you can imagine the feelings of these Indians for generations over this terrible business.
[Col. Wedgwood, MP, speaking in the British Parliament, 22 December 1919]
View More Questions