Step 1: Recall the test for linear independence.
A set of vectors is linearly independent if the only way to write \(c_1v_1+c_2v_2+\dots=0\) is with every \(c_i=0\). For three vectors in \(\mathbb{R}^3\), we can check this by forming a 3x3 matrix out of the vectors and checking that its determinant is not zero. For a set of just two vectors, they are independent unless one is a scalar multiple of the other.
Step 2: Test the set S.
\(S = \{(1,0,0), (0,0,-5), (0,3,4)\}\). Write these as rows of a matrix and find the determinant.
\[
\begin{vmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -5 \\ 0 & 3 & 4 \end{vmatrix}
\]
Expanding along the first row, only the first entry survives, since the other two are multiplied by 0:
\[
= 1 \times \begin{vmatrix} 0 & -5 \\ 3 & 4 \end{vmatrix} = 1 \times (0 \times 4 - (-5)\times 3) = 1 \times 15 = 15
\]
The determinant is 15, which is not zero. So the three vectors in S are linearly independent.
Step 3: Test the set T.
\(T = \{(5,2,3), (5,-3,4)\}\) has only two vectors, so they can only be dependent if one is a scalar multiple of the other. Suppose \((5,-3,4) = k(5,2,3)\) for some scalar \(k\). Matching the first coordinates gives \(k=1\). But then the second coordinates would need \(2=-3\), which is false. So no such \(k\) exists, and the two vectors in T are linearly independent.
Step 4: Combine the results.
S is a linearly independent set of three vectors, since its determinant is nonzero, and T is a linearly independent set of two vectors, since neither is a scalar multiple of the other. So both S and T are linearly independent sets.
Step 5: Why the other options are wrong.
Option (B) claims T fails to be independent, but we showed the two vectors of T cannot be written as multiples of each other. Option (C) claims S fails, but its determinant is a clear nonzero 15. Option (D) claims both fail, which contradicts both checks above.
Final Answer:
Both S and T are sets of linearly independent vectors.
\[ \boxed{\text{Both S and T are linearly independent}} \]