$( S 1)(p \Rightarrow q) \vee(p \wedge(\sim q))$ is a tautology(S2) $((\sim p) \Rightarrow(\sim q)) \wedge((\sim p) \vee q)$ is a contradictionThen
| p | q | p ⇒ q | ∼q | p∧∼q | (p ⇒ q) ∨ (p∧∼q) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | T | T | F | F | T |
| T | F | F | T | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | F | T |
| F | F | T | T | F | T |
| ∼p | ∼q | ∼p ⇒ ∼q | ∼p ∨ q | ((∼p) ⇒ (∼q)) ∧ (∼p)∨q) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | F | T | T | T |
| F | T | T | F | F |
| T | F | F | T | F |
| T | T | T | T | T |
Step 1: Analyze \( S1 \): \[ S1 = (p \Rightarrow q) \vee (p \land \neg q). \] Let's check its truth table: \[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline p & q & p \Rightarrow q & p \land \neg q \\ \hline T & T & T & F \\ T & F & F & T \\ F & T & T & F \\ F & F & T & F \\ \hline \end{array} \] For \( (p \Rightarrow q) \vee (p \land \neg q) \), we evaluate the disjunction in each case:
- When \( p = T \) and \( q = T \), \( (p \Rightarrow q) = T \), and \( (p \land \neg q) = F \), so the result is \( T \).
- When \( p = T \) and \( q = F \), \( (p \Rightarrow q) = F \), and \( (p \land \neg q) = T \), so the result is \( T \).
- When \( p = F \) and \( q = T \), \( (p \Rightarrow q) = T \), and \( (p \land \neg q) = F \), so the result is \( T \).
- When \( p = F \) and \( q = F \), \( (p \Rightarrow q) = T \), and \( (p \land \neg q) = F \), so the result is \( T \).
Thus, it evaluates to true in all cases, which means \( S1 \) is a tautology.
Step 2: Analyze \( S2 \): \[ S2 = (\neg p) \Rightarrow (\neg q) \land ((\neg p) \vee q). \] Let's check its truth table: \[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline p & q & \neg p & \neg q & (\neg p) \Rightarrow (\neg q) & (\neg p) \vee q \\ \hline T & T & F & F & T & T \\ T & F & F & T & T & F \\ F & T & T & F & F & T \\ F & F & T & T & T & T \\ \hline \end{array} \] From the truth table, we see that \( S2 \) does not evaluate to false for all cases, meaning \( S2 \) is not a contradiction. It evaluates to true in some cases, and therefore \( S2 \) is not incorrect but has cases where it is true.
What will be the equilibrium constant of the given reaction carried out in a \(5 \,L\) vessel and having equilibrium amounts of \(A_2\) and \(A\) as \(0.5\) mole and \(2 \times 10^{-6}\) mole respectively?
The reaction : \(A_2 \rightleftharpoons 2A\)
Mathematical reasoning or the principle of mathematical reasoning is a part of mathematics where we decide the truth values of the given statements. These reasoning statements are common in most competitive exams like JEE and the questions are extremely easy and fun to solve.
Mathematically, reasoning can be of two major types such as: