Comprehension
Read the information given below to answer the questions.
A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H want to have a dinner on a round table and they have worked out the following seating arrangements.
(a) A will sit beside C.
(b) H will sit beside A.
(c) C will sit beside E.
(d) F will sit beside H.
(e) E will sit beside G.
(f) D will sit beside F.
(g) G will sit beside B.
(h) B will sit beside D.
Question: 1
Which of the following is wrong?
Which of the following is wrong?
Show Hint
When many “beside” conditions appear, grow a single open chain by forcing second neighbors; it usually closes into one unique circle. For left/right in round tables with everyone facing the center: right = anti-clockwise, left = clockwise.
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- A will be to the immediate right of C
- D will be to the immediate left of B
- E will be to the immediate right of A
- F will be to the immediate left of D
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
Step 1: Build the chain using “beside” constraints
A must be adjacent to C and H (a), (b). So A’s two neighbors are exactly \{C, H\}.
From (c), C must also sit beside E. Since C already uses one side for A, the other neighbor of C is E. Thus the local order is either A–C–E or E–C–A.
From (e), E sits beside G. E already sits next to C, therefore E’s other neighbor is G. Extend: A–C–E–G (in some direction).
From (g), G sits beside B. Hence G’s other neighbor is B. Extend: A–C–E–G–B.
From (h), B sits beside D. Therefore B’s other neighbor is D. Extend: A–C–E–G–B–D.
From (f), D sits beside F, so D’s other neighbor is F. Extend: …–B–D–F.
From (d), F sits beside H, thus F’s other neighbor is H. Because H must also be next to A (b), closing the circle gives the unique clockwise order:
\[ A – C – E – G – B – D – F – H – (back to A) \] Step 2: Fix “left” and “right” around a round table
In circular seating, everyone faces the center unless stated otherwise. A person’s immediate right is the seat anti-clockwise from them; the immediate left is the seat clockwise from them. (Stand at a seat and face the center—your right-hand neighbor sits anti-clockwise.)
Step 3: Test each option on the arrangement
(A) A to the immediate right of C: For C, the anti-clockwise neighbor is A (order … A–C–E …). Hence true.
(B) D to the immediate left of B: For B, the clockwise neighbor (left) is D (… G–B–D …). Hence true.
(C) E to the immediate right of A: For A, the anti-clockwise neighbor (right) is H (… F–H–A–C …), not E. Hence false.
(D) F to the immediate left of D: For D, the clockwise neighbor (left) is F (… B–D–F …). Hence true. Conclusion: Only statement (C) is wrong.
A must be adjacent to C and H (a), (b). So A’s two neighbors are exactly \{C, H\}.
From (c), C must also sit beside E. Since C already uses one side for A, the other neighbor of C is E. Thus the local order is either A–C–E or E–C–A.
From (e), E sits beside G. E already sits next to C, therefore E’s other neighbor is G. Extend: A–C–E–G (in some direction).
From (g), G sits beside B. Hence G’s other neighbor is B. Extend: A–C–E–G–B.
From (h), B sits beside D. Therefore B’s other neighbor is D. Extend: A–C–E–G–B–D.
From (f), D sits beside F, so D’s other neighbor is F. Extend: …–B–D–F.
From (d), F sits beside H, thus F’s other neighbor is H. Because H must also be next to A (b), closing the circle gives the unique clockwise order:
\[ A – C – E – G – B – D – F – H – (back to A) \] Step 2: Fix “left” and “right” around a round table
In circular seating, everyone faces the center unless stated otherwise. A person’s immediate right is the seat anti-clockwise from them; the immediate left is the seat clockwise from them. (Stand at a seat and face the center—your right-hand neighbor sits anti-clockwise.)
Step 3: Test each option on the arrangement
(A) A to the immediate right of C: For C, the anti-clockwise neighbor is A (order … A–C–E …). Hence true.
(B) D to the immediate left of B: For B, the clockwise neighbor (left) is D (… G–B–D …). Hence true.
(C) E to the immediate right of A: For A, the anti-clockwise neighbor (right) is H (… F–H–A–C …), not E. Hence false.
(D) F to the immediate left of D: For D, the clockwise neighbor (left) is F (… B–D–F …). Hence true. Conclusion: Only statement (C) is wrong.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
Using the seating loop A - C - E - G - B - D - F - H (back to A), with everyone facing the centre so that a clockwise step lands on a person's immediate left and an anti-clockwise step lands on their immediate right, let's test each statement:
- A will be to the immediate right of C: Moving anti-clockwise from C (backwards along the loop) lands on A, since the loop reads ...A-C-E.... Since anti-clockwise gives the right-hand neighbour, A is indeed to the immediate right of C. This statement is true.
- D will be to the immediate left of B: Moving clockwise (forward) from B along the loop ...G-B-D... lands on D. Since clockwise gives the left-hand neighbour, D is indeed to the immediate left of B. This statement is true.
- E will be to the immediate right of A: A's two neighbours in the loop are C (forward, its left) and H (backward, its right), since the loop closes as ...F-H-A-C.... E is nowhere adjacent to A at all; E sits two places away from A on the C side. So A's immediate right is H, not E, making this statement false.
- F will be to the immediate left of D: Moving clockwise (forward) from D along the loop ...B-D-F... lands on F. Since clockwise gives the left-hand neighbour, F is indeed to the immediate left of D. This statement is true.
Three of the four statements check out against the loop, and only the claim about E and A fails, since A's actual right-hand neighbour is H, not E.
Therefore, the correct answer is E will be to the immediate right of A.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -3
With everyone seated in the fixed clockwise loop A-C-E-G-B-D-F-H (back to A), it helps to assign each seat a position number, 1 through 8, in this exact clockwise order: A=1, C=2, E=3, G=4, B=5, D=6, F=7, H=8, with position 8 followed by position 1 again. Facing the centre, a person's immediate left is the next position number clockwise, adding 1 and wrapping 8 back to 1, and their immediate right is the previous position number, subtracting 1 and wrapping 1 back to 8. Let's check each statement using this numbering:
- A will be to the immediate right of C: C is position 2, so C's right-hand neighbour is position \( 2 - 1 = 1 \), which is A. This statement is true.
- D will be to the immediate left of B: B is position 5, so B's left-hand neighbour is position \( 5 + 1 = 6 \), which is D. This statement is true.
- E will be to the immediate right of A: A is position 1, so A's right-hand neighbour is position \( 1 - 1 \), which wraps around to position 8, that is, H, not E, which is position 3. This statement is false.
- F will be to the immediate left of D: D is position 6, so D's left-hand neighbour is position \( 6 + 1 = 7 \), which is F. This statement is true.
Working through the position numbers confirms that only the claim about E being to the right of A fails; A's actual right-hand neighbour is H.
Therefore, the correct answer is E will be to the immediate right of A.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
Which of the following is correct?
Which of the following is correct?
Show Hint
Fix one validated circular order and stick to a consistent left/right rule (facing centre: right = anti-clockwise, left = clockwise). Then check each option directly on the ring.
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- B will be to the immediate left of D
- H will be to the immediate right of A
- C will be to the immediate right of F
- B will be to the immediate left of H
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Approach Solution - 1
Recap of the unique circular order (from Q186 constraints)
Working through the “beside” conditions yields the only consistent clockwise seating:
\[ A – C – E – G – B – D – F – H – (back to A) \] Left/Right convention on round tables
All face the centre. A person’s immediate right is the seat anti-clockwise from them; the immediate left is the seat clockwise from them. Test each option against the arrangement
(A) B to the immediate left of D? For D, the clockwise neighbor (left) is F (order … B–D–F …). Not B. False.
(B) H to the immediate right of A? For A, the anti-clockwise neighbor (right) is H (… F–H–A–C …). True.
(C) C to the immediate right of F? For F, the anti-clockwise neighbor (right) is D (… D–F–H …). Not C. False.
(D) B to the immediate left of H? For H, the clockwise neighbor (left) is A (… F–H–A …). Not B. False. Conclusion: Only statement (B) is correct.
Working through the “beside” conditions yields the only consistent clockwise seating:
\[ A – C – E – G – B – D – F – H – (back to A) \] Left/Right convention on round tables
All face the centre. A person’s immediate right is the seat anti-clockwise from them; the immediate left is the seat clockwise from them. Test each option against the arrangement
(A) B to the immediate left of D? For D, the clockwise neighbor (left) is F (order … B–D–F …). Not B. False.
(B) H to the immediate right of A? For A, the anti-clockwise neighbor (right) is H (… F–H–A–C …). True.
(C) C to the immediate right of F? For F, the anti-clockwise neighbor (right) is D (… D–F–H …). Not C. False.
(D) B to the immediate left of H? For H, the clockwise neighbor (left) is A (… F–H–A …). Not B. False. Conclusion: Only statement (B) is correct.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
Using the same seating loop A - C - E - G - B - D - F - H (back to A), with clockwise steps giving a person's immediate left and anti-clockwise steps giving their immediate right, let's test each statement:
- B will be to the immediate left of D: Moving clockwise (forward) from D along the loop ...B-D-F... lands on F, not B, so D's immediate left is F. This statement is false.
- H will be to the immediate right of A: The loop closes as ...F-H-A-C..., so moving anti-clockwise (backward) from A lands on H. Since anti-clockwise gives the right-hand neighbour, H is indeed to the immediate right of A. This statement is true.
- C will be to the immediate right of F: Moving anti-clockwise (backward) from F along the loop ...D-F-H... lands on D, not C, so F's immediate right is D. This statement is false.
- B will be to the immediate left of H: Moving clockwise (forward) from H along the loop ...H-A-C... lands on A, not B, so H's immediate left is A. This statement is false.
Only the statement about H sitting to the immediate right of A matches the seating loop.
Therefore, the correct answer is H will be to the immediate right of A.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -3
Using the same position-numbering system, A=1, C=2, E=3, G=4, B=5, D=6, F=7, H=8 clockwise, with left neighbour at position+1 and right neighbour at position-1, wrapping around the 8 seats, let's check each statement:
- B will be to the immediate left of D: D is position 6, so D's left neighbour is position \( 6 + 1 = 7 \), which is F, not B, which is position 5. This statement is false.
- H will be to the immediate right of A: A is position 1, so A's right neighbour is position \( 1 - 1 \), wrapping around to position 8, which is H. This statement is true.
- C will be to the immediate right of F: F is position 7, so F's right neighbour is position \( 7 - 1 = 6 \), which is D, not C, which is position 2. This statement is false.
- B will be to the immediate left of H: H is position 8, so H's left neighbour is position \( 8 + 1 \), wrapping around to position 1, which is A, not B. This statement is false.
Working through the position numbers shows that only the claim about H sitting to the right of A holds up.
Therefore, the correct answer is H will be to the immediate right of A.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
A and F will become neighbours if:
A and F will become neighbours if:
Show Hint
When two people are separated by exactly one fixed neighbour in a circular arrangement, they can become adjacent only if that common neighbour moves.
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- B agrees to change her sitting position
- C agrees to change her sitting position
- G agrees to change her sitting position
- H agrees to change her sitting position
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Approach Solution - 1
Established clockwise order (from Q186): A – C – E – G – B – D – F – H – (back to A).
Here, A’s neighbours are C and H; F’s neighbours are D and H. The only person sitting between A and F is H.
Therefore, unless H vacates that seat (i.e., H changes position), A and F cannot become adjacent. Changing the seats of B, C, or G does not remove H from between A and F. Hence only option (D) works.
Here, A’s neighbours are C and H; F’s neighbours are D and H. The only person sitting between A and F is H.
Therefore, unless H vacates that seat (i.e., H changes position), A and F cannot become adjacent. Changing the seats of B, C, or G does not remove H from between A and F. Hence only option (D) works.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The seating loop is A - C - E - G - B - D - F - H (back to A). A and F are not currently adjacent; going one way around the table from A we pass C, E, G, B, D before reaching F (five people in between), and going the other way we pass only H before reaching F. So the short path between A and F has exactly one person sitting in it: H. Let's test each option:
- B agrees to change her sitting position: B sits between G and D, nowhere near the short A-H-F stretch, so moving B does not bring A and F any closer together.
- C agrees to change her sitting position: C sits between A and E, on the long side of the table relative to F, so moving C does not affect the short A-H-F stretch either.
- G agrees to change her sitting position: G sits between E and B, also on the long side away from the A-F gap, so moving G leaves the short path unaffected.
- H agrees to change her sitting position: H is the one and only person occupying the seat directly between A and F on the short side of the table. If H moves away from that seat, A and F would become directly adjacent.
Since H is the sole obstruction between A and F, only a change in H's position can make them neighbours.
Therefore, the correct answer is H agrees to change her sitting position.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -3
A and F are not currently neighbours, so the question asks whose seat would need to change to bring them together. A useful way to see this is to write out each person's current two neighbours as a small list, then look for anyone who appears in BOTH A's neighbour list and F's neighbour list, since such a shared person is effectively the single bridge sitting between them:
- B: B's neighbours are G and D. B does not appear in A's neighbour list, C and H, or in F's neighbour list, D and H, so moving B has no bearing on the seat directly between A and F.
- C: C's neighbours are A and E. While C is one of A's neighbours, C does not appear anywhere in F's neighbour list, so moving C affects only A's other side, not the side facing F.
- G: G's neighbours are E and B. G appears in neither A's nor F's neighbour list, so moving G does nothing to close the gap between them.
- H: H's neighbours are F and A, meaning H is the one person who appears in BOTH A's neighbour list and F's neighbour list at once. H is the shared bridge sitting directly between them.
Since H is the only person common to both A's and F's immediate neighbour lists, only a change in H's seat can remove the single person separating A from F.
Therefore, the correct answer is H agrees to change her sitting position.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4
During sitting:
During sitting:
Show Hint
For $n=8$ in a round table, the person directly opposite is found by moving $+4$ seats (mod 8).
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- A will be directly facing C
- B will be directly facing C
- A will be directly facing B
- B will be directly facing D
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
With 8 seats, opposite seats are 4 places apart. Using the fixed order:
Indices (clockwise) $0$ A, $1$ C, $2$ E, $3$ G, $4$ B, $5$ D, $6$ F, $7$ H.
Opposites: A↔B (0↔4), C↔D (1↔5), E↔F (2↔6), G↔H (3↔7).
Thus A faces B, C faces D, etc. Only statement (C) matches this. Statements (A), (B), and (D) contradict the opposite pairs.
Indices (clockwise) $0$ A, $1$ C, $2$ E, $3$ G, $4$ B, $5$ D, $6$ F, $7$ H.
Opposites: A↔B (0↔4), C↔D (1↔5), E↔F (2↔6), G↔H (3↔7).
Thus A faces B, C faces D, etc. Only statement (C) matches this. Statements (A), (B), and (D) contradict the opposite pairs.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
With eight people seated evenly around a round table, the person directly opposite anyone is exactly four seats away, counted in either direction, since \( 8 \div 2 = 4 \). Using the loop A - C - E - G - B - D - F - H (back to A), let's count four steps from A in each direction and check each option:
- A will be directly facing C: C is only one seat away from A along the loop, not four seats away in either direction, so C cannot be directly opposite A.
- B will be directly facing C: Counting four steps clockwise from C, C-E-G-B, is only 3 steps to B, not 4, so B is not exactly opposite C; C's true opposite is D (counting C-E-G-B-D is 4 steps).
- A will be directly facing B: Counting four steps clockwise from A, A-C-E-G-B, is exactly four steps, landing on B. Counting four steps the other way (anti-clockwise) from A, A-H-F-D-B, is also exactly four steps, landing on B again. Both directions agree that B sits directly opposite A.
- B will be directly facing D: Counting four steps from B, B-D-F-H-A, lands on A in four steps, not D, so B's true opposite is A, not D.
Counting four seats around the loop in either direction from A consistently lands on B, confirming they sit directly across from each other.
Therefore, the correct answer is A will be directly facing B.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -3
On a round table seating exactly eight people, being "directly facing" someone means there are exactly three people sitting between the pair on each side, three plus the two people themselves plus three more equals all eight seats. Using the loop A-C-E-G-B-D-F-H (back to A), let's check each option by counting people on both sides:
- A will be directly facing C: Going from A to C the short way passes zero people in between, they are immediate neighbours, not opposite. This statement is false.
- B will be directly facing C: Going from C to B one way, C-E-G-B, passes two people, E and G, in between, not three, so they are not directly opposite. This statement is false.
- A will be directly facing B: Going from A to B one way, A-C-E-G-B, passes three people, C, E, G, in between, and going the other way, A-H-F-D-B, also passes exactly three people, H, F, D, in between. Both directions agree on a three-person gap, confirming they are directly opposite.
- B will be directly facing D: B and D are actually named as neighbours in clue (h), "B will sit beside D," so they have zero people between them, not three, meaning they cannot possibly be opposite each other.
Counting three people on both sides between A and B confirms they sit directly across the table from each other, while the other pairs fail this count.
Therefore, the correct answer is A will be directly facing B.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5
H will be sitting between:
H will be sitting between:
Show Hint
Once the circle is fixed, read “between” as “the two immediate neighbours of the person” and simply list their adjacent seats.
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- C and B
- A and F
- D and C
- E and G
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Approach Solution - 1
From the fixed arrangement A – C – E – G – B – D – F – H – A, the neighbours of H are F (on one side) and A (on the other). Hence H sits between A and F. Other pairs listed do not flank H in the circle.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks which two people H sits between. Instead of reconstructing the entire seating order, we can answer this directly from just two of the original clues. Clue (b) states "H will sit beside A", and clue (d) states "F will sit beside H". Since a round table gives every person exactly two immediate neighbours, and these two clues already name both of H's neighbours directly, no further reconstruction is needed to answer this particular question. Let's still check each option against this:
- C and B: Neither C nor B is mentioned as sitting beside H in any of the original clues, so this pairing does not match H's actual neighbours.
- A and F: Clue (b) directly places A beside H, and clue (d) directly places F beside H. Both of H's neighbours are accounted for exactly by this pair.
- D and C: Neither D nor C is linked to H in the original clues; D sits beside B and F, while C sits beside A and E, so this option is incorrect.
- E and G: Neither E nor G is linked to H at all in the clues; they sit beside each other and beside C and B respectively, unrelated to H's seat.
Since the original clues directly state that H sits beside both A and F, and no other person is ever linked to H, H's two neighbours are confirmed as A and F.
Therefore, the correct answer is A and F.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -3
Using the completed seating loop A-C-E-G-B-D-F-H, back to A, we can find H's neighbours simply by locating H in this ring and reading off the person immediately before and immediately after it. Let's check each option against the ring directly:
- C and B: In the ring, C sits between A and E, while B sits between G and D, neither one is positioned next to H at all, so this pairing does not match H's actual neighbours.
- A and F: The ring reads ...D-F-H-A-C..., so the person immediately before H is F, and the person immediately after H is A. Both A and F sit directly on either side of H in the ring.
- D and C: D sits between B and F in the ring, and C sits between A and E, neither of them is adjacent to H, so this pairing is incorrect.
- E and G: E sits between C and G, and G sits between E and B, neither is anywhere near H's position in the ring.
Reading the ring directly around H's position shows its two immediate neighbours are F on one side and A on the other, matching only the second option.
Therefore, the correct answer is A and F.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top CLAT Questions
- In the realm of contemporary literature, the interplay between character and setting is a nuanced dance that shapes the narrative’s essence. The setting, often described with painstaking detail, becomes more than a backdrop; it becomes a character, influencing the plot and character development.
Consider, for instance, the barren expanse of the desert in Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake. The arid landscape mirrors the sense of isolation felt by the protagonist, Gogol, as he navigates his identity crisis in a foreign land. The relentless sun and vast sands are not mere descriptions; they are the silent witnesses to his inner turmoil.
On the other end of the literary spectrum, there is Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. The lush, vibrant Kerala backwaters are not just the setting; they are a character woven into the fabric of the story. The teeming, humid landscape reflects the complex web of human relationships and secrets that unravel in the narrative. This interplay is not confined to contemporary literature alone. In Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy Macbeth, the eerie and foreboding setting of the Scottish moors casts a dark shadow over the characters’ actions. The moors, shrouded in mist and mystery, serve as an ever-present omen of the impending tragedy. - The crisis of justice that is the subject matter of discussion in the media today is in fact the crisis of “justice for the middle class”. The main difference between India and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries is that whereas the middle class in these countries has reasonable access to justice, in India it does not. A vocal and powerful middle class has emerged in India since 1991. It is demanding reasonable access to justice. Much of the judicial reform effort will help meet this demand…
The question of justice for the poor is, however, an altogether different challenge. No country in the world has been able to secure justice for the poor. Most of the jails of the richest countries are filled with the poorest. The “masses” are more often victims of the criminal justice system than of crime. In India as well, jails are almost exclusively filled with the poor. The civil justice system is hardly accessible to them. They are often victimised by lawyers, touts and court staff. They are docket-excluded, a new type of untouchability. The language and the logic—and the colonial and feudal culture—of the judicial system are alien to them. It rarely takes cognisance of their needs and interests.
Their main concern, therefore, is to escape the attention of the justice system, criminal and civil. A landless Dalit person in the interior of Madhya Pradesh once gave me an insightful definition of a court from the perspective of the masses: “A court is a place where you are forcibly taken by the police to be punished; no one goes to a court.” In contrast, many lawyers and judges colloquially define a court as “a temple of justice where rights are protected”.
These sharply divergent visions mean that justice for one section is often injustice for another. Protecting the livelihood of traditional taxi and auto drivers from predatory pricing by corporate app-based taxi providers by imaginatively using the available tools of law to delay their incursion would be seen by the rich and by sections of the middle class as a failure of the judicial system, and possibly as also resulting in a downgrading of the “ease of doing business” measure. However, the masses would see such a judicial intervention as strong evidence of a good justice system. Although the conflict over competing visions of the nation and conflicting demands from social and economic segments have confined judicial reform of judicial administration mainly to “neutral” areas such as process reform, procedural law, technology, planning and court and case management, judge strength, and the workload of judges, there has been considerable improvement in these areas, and the judicial system has improved its performance.
[Extracted, with edits, from “Justice and the Two Ideas of India”, by G. Mohan Gopal, Frontline] - Everything she wanted was here, at Carignano, in Kasauli. Here, on the ridge of the mountain, in this quiet house. It was the place, and the time of life, that she had wanted and prepared for all her life-as she realized on the first day at Carignano, with a great, cool flowering of relief - and at last she had it. She wanted no one and nothing else. Whatever else came, or happened here, would be an unwelcome intrusion and distraction. This she tried to convey to the plodding postman with a cold and piercing stare from the height of the ridge onto his honest bull back. Unfortunately, he did not look up at her on the hilltop but stared stolidly down at the dust piling onto his shoes as he plodded on. A bullock-man, an oafish ox, she thought bitterly. She stepped backwards into the garden and the wind suddenly billowed up and threw the pine branches about as though to curtain her. She was grey, tall and thin and her silk sari made a sweeping, shivering sound and she fancied she could merge with the pine trees and be mistaken for one. To be a tree, no more and no less, was all she was prepared to undertake.
What pleased and satisfied her so, here at Carignano, was its barrenness. This was the chief virtue of all Kasauli of course-its starkness. It had rocks, it had pines, it had light and air. In every direction there was a sweeping view - to the north, of the mountains, to the south, of the plains. Occasionally an eagle swam through this clear unobstructed mass of light and air, that was all. And Carignano, her home on the ridge, had no more than that. Why should it? The sun shone on its white walls. Its windows were open the ones facing north opened on to the blue waves of the Himalayas flowing out and up to the line of ice and snow sketched upon the sky, while those that faced south looked down the plunging cliff to the plain stretching out, flat and sere to the blurred horizon.
Yes, there were some apricot trees close to the house. There were clumps of iris that had finished blooming. There was the kitchen with a wing of smoke lifting out of its chimney and a stack of wood outside its door. But these were incidental, almost unimportant.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “Fire on the Mountain” by Anita Desai] - English literature is a vast and diverse field that has left an indelible mark on the world of letters. From the eloquent plays of William Shakespeare to the complex novels of Jane Austen and the profound poetry of William Wordsworth, English literature offers a window into the human experience. One of the luminaries of English literature is William Shakespeare, often hailed as the greatest playwright in the history of English language. His works, including Hamlet, Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet, are celebrated for their exploration of human nature, love, ambition, and tragedy. His characters, such as the tormented Hamlet and the star-crossed lovers Romeo and Juliet, continue to captivate readers and audiences worldwide.
The 19th century ushered in a new era of literary giants. Jane Austen’s novels, such as Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility, provide incisive social commentary through the lens of wit and romance. Austen’s heroines, like Elizabeth Bennet and Elinor Dashwood, remain beloved literary figures known for their intelligence and resilience. The Romantic era brought forth poets like William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who celebrated * 8 UG the beauty of nature and the emotional intensity of the individual. Wordsworth’s ‘‘I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud’’ and Coleridge’s ‘‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’’ are testament to the power of the written words to evoke profound emotions and imagery. Moving towards 20th century, English literature continued to evolve. Virginia Woolf’s ground-breaking novel Mrs. Dalloway explored the inner thoughts and lives of its characters with a modernist narrative style. Dystopian visions, as seen in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four provided stark warnings about the dangers of totalitarianism and the erosion of individual freedom.
Today, English literature is a global phenomenon, transcending borders and languages. Indian authors like Arundhati Roy, with her novel The God of Small Things, have won prestigious international literary awards. The book not only explores intricate family dynamics but also delves into the broader socio-political landscape of India. In summary, English literature is a testament to the enduring power of storytelling and the written word. It encompasses an array of authors, themes, and styles that continue to captivate and inspire readers across the world. - On the evening of the 10th, General Dyer arrived at Amritsar, and the Deputy-Commissioner handed over the civil power to him. He issued a proclamation by word of mouth that no meetings should be held. Two days later, after there had been no sort of riot, nor murder, General Dyer heard that a meeting was to be held at the Jallianwala Bagh. He proceeded there with about fifty troops, half British, half Indian, and a certain number of Ghurkas, armed with their kukris. The Jallianwala Bagh is an open space, half a mile square, which has one entry wide enough for three persons. The troops got in and lined up on a mound of debris. The walls, seven feet high, and the surrounding houses enclosed the people. There were, too, three alleys through which the people might have been able to pass. Within thirty seconds of the troops getting in, General Dyer gave orders to fire, and the crowd of people, estimated at anything from 5,000 to 20,000, who were sitting on the ground peacefully listening to the mob oratory, were fired on. The result of the troops’ fire into the mass of people we do not know. But we do know that Dyer’s own estimate of the casualties resulting from ten minutes continual individual firing, was 400 to 500 killed and 1,500 wounded. The people were not able to escape. They were people who had not offered any violence and who had not been warned. These people were shot down. After ten minutes, the ammunition was exhausted and the troops marched off, and they left 1,500 wounded there. There were men lying there for two days, dying of thirst, eating the ground, bleeding to death and nobody to look after them. Those who lived nearby came and carried away some of the wounded from the heap of dead and dying, but the unfortunate country people died there miserably of their wounds. This is what is done in 1919 in British India…
Centuries hence you will find Indian children brought up to this spot, just as they visit now the Cawnpore Well, and you can imagine the feelings of these Indians for generations over this terrible business.
[Col. Wedgwood, MP, speaking in the British Parliament, 22 December 1919]
View More Questions