The passage provides two key pieces of information:
1. Tomato cultivation is expanding into less productive regions.
2. Traditional fertile cultivation areas are shrinking every year due to salinity, drought, and soil erosion, with a loss of about 2 million hectares annually.
Step 1: Understanding expansion into less productive regions
Although the cultivation area is increasing, the fact that new areas are "not so productive" implies that the overall yield per hectare would be lower than in the traditional high-yielding regions.
Step 2: Understanding the contraction of traditional fertile areas
The areas that were most favourable for tomato cultivation are shrinking rapidly due to environmental challenges. This means that the most efficient, high-yield areas are being lost, further reducing the average per hectare productivity.
Step 3: Drawing the inference
Since high-yield areas are shrinking and expansion is occurring in less productive zones, the combined effect is a decline in per hectare tomato production worldwide.
Why not the other options?
\begin{itemize}
\item
Option A: Incorrect, because per hectare production is not increasing; it is actually decreasing.
\item
Option B: Incorrect, wastage of tomato is not mentioned in the passage.
\item
Option D: Incorrect, again wastage is not the subject of the passage.
\item
Option E: Incorrect, per hectare production cannot remain the same when fertile land is shrinking and expansion is into less productive regions.
\end{itemize}
Thus, the correct inference is that the per hectare production of tomato has decreased worldwide.
Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{\text{C. In recent years, per hectare production of tomato has decreased worldwide}}
\]