Step 1: Find the original annual income.
The person holds Rs. 10,000 face value of 4% debentures.
Annual income from these debentures is 4% of Rs. 10,000:
\[ 10000 \times \frac{4}{100} = 400 \]
So his original annual income is Rs. 400.
Step 2: Work out the sale of 3/4 of the debentures.
3/4 of Rs. 10,000 face value is:
\[ 10000 \times \frac{3}{4} = 7500 \]
This Rs. 7,500 face value is sold at a discount of 6%, meaning he gets only 94% of face value for it:
\[ 7500 \times \frac{94}{100} = 7050 \]
So he receives Rs. 7,050 from this sale.
Step 3: Invest this money in steel shares.
Steel shares cost Rs. 470 each. Number of shares he can buy:
\[ \frac{7050}{470} = 15 \]
He buys 15 shares. Each share pays Rs. 16 a year, so his income from shares is:
\[ 15 \times 16 = 240 \]
Step 4: Work out the sale of the remaining 1/4 of the debentures.
The remaining face value is:
\[ 10000 \times \frac{1}{4} = 2500 \]
This is sold at Rs. 105 (per 100 face value), meaning he gets 105% of face value:
\[ 2500 \times \frac{105}{100} = 2625 \]
So he receives Rs. 2,625 from this sale.
Step 5: Buy bonds with this money.
Bonds cost Rs. 75 each. Number of bonds he can buy:
\[ \frac{2625}{75} = 35 \]
He buys 35 bonds. Each bond pays Rs. 5 a year, so his income from bonds is:
\[ 35 \times 5 = 175 \]
Step 6: Find the new total annual income and compare.
New annual income = income from shares + income from bonds:
\[ 240 + 175 = 415 \]
Change in income = new income minus old income:
\[ 415 - 400 = 15 \]
Since 415 is greater than 400, his annual income increases by Rs. 15.
Step 7: Why the other options fail.
Option (1), a decrease of Rs. 15, is the reverse of what actually happens, his income goes up, not down.
Option (2), an increase of Rs. 25, comes from a wrong split or a wrong price used in one of the two purchases.
Option (4), None, is wrong since Rs. 15 increase is exactly what we get.
Final Answer:
His annual income increases by Rs. 15 in 1970.
\[ \boxed{\text{Rs. 15 increase}} \]