Step 1: Understand each part of the expression.
The expression picks out tuples \(t\) from relation \(X\) that satisfy two conditions.
The middle condition \(\exists z \in X(t[P] = z[P])\) asks: does some tuple \(z\) in \(X\) exist with the same \(P\) value as \(t\)? Since \(t\) itself is already a tuple of \(X\), we can always choose \(z = t\), and then \(t[P] = z[P]\) is trivially true. So this condition holds for every tuple in \(X\) and does not filter out anything.
The real filter is the last condition: \(\exists m \in Y(m[P] = t[P] \wedge m[S] > 1)\). This asks whether some row \(m\) in \(Y\) has the same \(P\) value as \(t\) and has \(S > 1\).
Step 2: Check the condition for each tuple of X.
X has three tuples: \((P1, Q1, R1)\), \((P2, Q2, R2)\), \((P3, Q3, R2)\). Check the \(Y\) rows for each \(P\) value.
For \(P1\): Y has rows \((P1, 10)\) and \((P1, 15)\). Both have \(S > 1\). So a matching \(m\) exists, and the condition is true.
For \(P2\): Y has the row \((P2, 20)\). Since \(20 > 1\), the condition is true.
For \(P3\): Y has only the row \((P3, 1)\). Here \(S = 1\), and \(1 > 1\) is false. There is no other row in \(Y\) with \(P = P3\), so no matching \(m\) exists. The condition is false for \(P3\).
Step 3: Collect the tuples that pass.
The tuple with \(P1\), namely \((P1, Q1, R1)\), passes.
The tuple with \(P2\), namely \((P2, Q2, R2)\), passes.
The tuple with \(P3\), namely \((P3, Q3, R2)\), fails and is excluded.
Final Answer:
Exactly 2 tuples of \(X\) satisfy the expression. \[ \boxed{2} \]