To solve this problem, we need to examine the properties of the matrix \( P \) and its implications for the adjoint of \( 2P \), denoted as \( Q \).
- Characteristics of the Matrix \( P \):
- \( P \) is a 3×3 matrix with eigenvalues 1, 1, and 2. The eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue 1 is \((1, -1, 2)^T\).
- The multiplicity of eigenvalue 1 is 2, but there is only one linearly independent eigenvector for it. Therefore, \( P \) is defective (not diagonalizable).
- Properties of \( 2P \):
- Scaling a matrix by a constant changes its eigenvalues proportionally. Therefore, the eigenvalues of \( 2P \) are: \(2 \times 1 = 2\), \(2 \times 1 = 2\), and \(2 \times 2 = 4\).
- Finding Adjoint \( Q \):
- The adjoint of a matrix, \( \text{adj}(A) \), is related to the determinant by the equation: \( A \cdot \text{adj}(A) = \text{det}(A) \cdot I \).
- For a 3×3 matrix \( A \), if its eigenvalues are \( \lambda_1, \lambda_2, \lambda_3 \), the eigenvalues of \( \text{adj}(A) \) are \( \frac{\text{det}(A)}{\lambda_1}, \frac{\text{det}(A)}{\lambda_2}, \frac{\text{det}(A)}{\lambda_3} \), assuming none of them are zero.
- Calculating \( \text{det}(2P) \): \(\text{det}(2P) = 2 \times 2 \times 4 = 16\).
- The eigenvalues of \( Q \) are \( \frac{16}{2} = 8\), \( \frac{16}{2} = 8\), and \( \frac{16}{4} = 4\).
- Evaluating the Options:
- trace(\( Q \) = 20): The trace is the sum of eigenvalues: \( 8 + 8 + 4 = 20 \). This statement is TRUE.
- det(\( Q \) = 64): The determinant of \( Q \) is the product of eigenvalues: \( 8 \times 8 \times 4 = 256\), not 64. This statement is FALSE.
- \((2, -2, 4)^T\) is an eigenvector of \( Q \): Since this is a scalar multiple of \((1, -1, 2)^T\), and eigenvectors corresponding to the same eigenvalue can be scaled, this statement is TRUE.
- \( Q^3 = 20Q^2 - 124Q + 256I_3 \): Determining polynomial identities without additional matrix-specific calculations is complex and high-level which is generally beyond what basic eigenvalue analysis provides in standard exam settings. Proper verification would require explicit matrix computation. While the polynomial can be complex to validate, our focus on baseline eigenvalue outcome based on known metrics makes this assertion inconclusive by basic exam context without further computation context.
Therefore, the correct options are trace(\( Q \)) = 20 and (2, −2, 4)T is an eigenvector of matrix \( Q \).