Let ๐ and ๐ be i.i.d. random variables each having the ๐(0, 1) distribution. Let ๐=\(\frac{๐}{๐}\) and ๐=|๐|. Then, which of the following statements is/are TRUE?
๐ธ(๐๐ก๐) does not exist for all ๐กโ(โโ, 0)
๐ 2~๐น1,1
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option isA, D
Solution and Explanation
To solve the given problem, we need to analyze the distributional properties of the random variables ๐ and ๐.
Consider the random variable \(๐ = \frac{๐}{๐}\). Since both ๐ and ๐ are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) standard normal random variables, ๐ follows a Cauchy distribution with location parameter 0 and scale parameter 1. This is a well-known result in probability theory when dealing with the ratio of two standard normal variables. Therefore, the statement "๐ has a Cauchy distribution" is true.
Next, consider the random variable \(๐ = |๐|\). Since ๐ is Cauchy distributed, ๐ is distributed as half-Cauchy.
Now, examine the statement "๐ธ(๐^{๐}) < โ, for some ๐ โฅ 1". The Cauchy distribution does not have a finite expectation or higher-order moments. Since the expectation of \(๐\) is undefined, so are the moments of \(๐\). Therefore, this statement is false.
Check the statement "๐ธ(๐^{๐ก๐}) does not exist for all ๐ก โ (โโ, 0)". This statement is false because, for a Cauchy distribution, the moment generating function does not exist, making it impossible to find an expected value for an exponential function involving ๐.
Finally, let's consider the variable \(๐^2\). The statement "๐^2 ~ F_{1,1}" is true because, if ๐ has a standard Cauchy distribution, then \(๐^2 = ๐^2\) follows an \(F\)-distribution with parameters \((1,1)\).