The problem involves testing the consistency of two statistical estimators, \(T_1\) and \(T_2\), for estimating the parameter \(\mu\) in a given probability density function.
Firstly, let's understand what consistency means in statistical estimation:
- An estimator is said to be consistent if, as the sample size \(n\) increases, the estimator converges in probability to the true parameter value. In more formal terms, an estimator \(\hat{\theta}_n\) for the parameter \(\theta\) is consistent if: \(\lim_{n \to \infty} P(|\hat{\theta}_n - \theta| > \epsilon) = 0\) for every \(\epsilon > 0\).
Now, let's analyze each estimator:
- The estimator \(T_1 = \frac{\overline{X} - 2}{2}\), where \(\overline{X} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_i\), is based on the sample mean. The sample mean \(\overline{X}\) is a consistent estimator for the population mean under the given density function. As \(n \rightarrow \infty\), \( \overline{X} \rightarrow E(X)\). Therefore, \(T_1\) being a linear transformation of \(\overline{X}\), is also consistent.
- The estimator \(T_2 = \frac{nX_{(1)} - 2}{2n}\), where \(X_{(1)} = \min \{X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n\}\) is based on the minimum order statistic. For large \(n\), \(X_{(1)}\) converges in distribution to the left endpoint of the support of the distribution, which is \(2\mu\) for the given density function. Hence, when appropriately scaled, \(T_2\) also converges to \(\mu\) as \(n\) increases, making \(T_2\) consistent.
Therefore, both \(T_1\) and \(T_2\) are consistent estimators of \(\mu\), making the correct answer: Both 𝑇1 and 𝑇2 are consistent.