Question:
Joyce: Three years ago the traffic commission modified our town's busiest intersection for better visibility, a commendable effort to cut down on traffic accidents there.
Gary: Over the past three years there have been more, not fewer, traffic accidents per week at that intersection, so the modification has increased the likelihood of accidents there
The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating Gary's argument?
Joyce: Three years ago the traffic commission modified our town's busiest intersection for better visibility, a commendable effort to cut down on traffic accidents there.
Gary: Over the past three years there have been more, not fewer, traffic accidents per week at that intersection, so the modification has increased the likelihood of accidents there
The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating Gary's argument?
Gary: Over the past three years there have been more, not fewer, traffic accidents per week at that intersection, so the modification has increased the likelihood of accidents there
The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating Gary's argument?
Show Hint
When evaluating a causal argument, always look for alternative causes. If someone claims "A caused B" simply because B happened after A, the best way to challenge their argument is to find another factor, C, that could also have caused B.
Updated On: Oct 4, 2025
- What proportion of the town's drivers involved in accidents that occurred prior to the modification suffered personal injury in their accidents?
- How long, on average, had the members of the traffic commission held their offices when the modification was implemented?
- Do a majority of the town's residents approve of the traffic commission's overall performance?
- What measures have nearby towns taken within the last three years in order to improve visibility at dangerous intersections?
- How has the volume of traffic at the town's busiest intersection changed over the last three years?
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is a critical reasoning question. We need to evaluate Gary's argument. Gary's argument is a classic example of a "post hoc ergo propter hoc" (after this, therefore because of this) fallacy. He observes that accidents increased after the modification and concludes that the modification \textit{caused} the increase. To evaluate this argument, we must consider other potential causes for the increase in accidents.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Gary's argument structure:
Premise: After the modification, the number of accidents per week increased.
Conclusion: Therefore, the modification caused the increase in accidents.
This argument is weak because it fails to consider alternative explanations. A strong evaluation would involve investigating other factors that could have led to an increase in accidents. Let's analyze the options:
(A) The severity of accidents (personal injury) is a different issue from the frequency of accidents. This information would not help evaluate Gary's claim about the \textit{likelihood} of accidents increasing.
(B) The tenure of the traffic commission members is irrelevant to the causal relationship between the modification and the accident rate.
(C) Public approval of the commission is irrelevant to the factual cause of the increased accident rate.
(D) Measures taken in nearby towns are irrelevant to the causes of accidents at this specific intersection in this town.
(E) This is a crucial question. If the volume of traffic at the intersection has significantly increased over the past three years, then an increase in the number of accidents might be expected, regardless of the modification. It's possible the modification actually \textit{decreased} the accident \textit{rate} (accidents per car), but the sheer increase in the number of cars led to a higher total number of accidents. This information is essential to determine whether the modification was a failure or if other factors were at play.
Step 3: Final Answer:
To properly evaluate Gary's claim that the modification caused more accidents, it is essential to know if another variable, such as traffic volume, has changed. An increase in traffic volume is a very strong alternative explanation for an increase in the number of accidents.
This is a critical reasoning question. We need to evaluate Gary's argument. Gary's argument is a classic example of a "post hoc ergo propter hoc" (after this, therefore because of this) fallacy. He observes that accidents increased after the modification and concludes that the modification \textit{caused} the increase. To evaluate this argument, we must consider other potential causes for the increase in accidents.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Gary's argument structure:
Premise: After the modification, the number of accidents per week increased.
Conclusion: Therefore, the modification caused the increase in accidents.
This argument is weak because it fails to consider alternative explanations. A strong evaluation would involve investigating other factors that could have led to an increase in accidents. Let's analyze the options:
(A) The severity of accidents (personal injury) is a different issue from the frequency of accidents. This information would not help evaluate Gary's claim about the \textit{likelihood} of accidents increasing.
(B) The tenure of the traffic commission members is irrelevant to the causal relationship between the modification and the accident rate.
(C) Public approval of the commission is irrelevant to the factual cause of the increased accident rate.
(D) Measures taken in nearby towns are irrelevant to the causes of accidents at this specific intersection in this town.
(E) This is a crucial question. If the volume of traffic at the intersection has significantly increased over the past three years, then an increase in the number of accidents might be expected, regardless of the modification. It's possible the modification actually \textit{decreased} the accident \textit{rate} (accidents per car), but the sheer increase in the number of cars led to a higher total number of accidents. This information is essential to determine whether the modification was a failure or if other factors were at play.
Step 3: Final Answer:
To properly evaluate Gary's claim that the modification caused more accidents, it is essential to know if another variable, such as traffic volume, has changed. An increase in traffic volume is a very strong alternative explanation for an increase in the number of accidents.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top GRE Verbal Reasoning Questions
- Some activists believe that because the health-care system has become increasingly ---- to those it serves, individuals must ---- bureaucratic impediments in order to develop and promote new therapies.
- The acts of vandalism that these pranksters had actually ---- were insignificant compared with those they had ---- but had not attempted.
- Though one cannot say that Michelangelo was an impractical designer, he was, of all nonprofessional architects known, the most ---- in that he was the least constrained by tradition or precedent.
- Before adapting to changes in values, many prefer to ----, to ---- the universally agreed-on principles that have been upheld for centuries.
- Although the records of colonial New England are ---- in comparison with those available in France or England, the records of other English colonies in America are even more ----.
View More Questions
Top GRE Critical Reasoning Questions
- Centuries ago, the Maya of Central America produced elaborate, deeply cut carvings in stone. The carvings would have required a cutting tool of hard stone or metal. Iron-ore deposits exist throughout Central America, but apparently the Maya never developed the technology to use them and the metals the Maya are known to have used, copper and gold, would not have been hard enough. Therefore, the Maya must have used stone tools to make these carvings.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? - Electric washing machines, first introduced in the United States in 1925, significantly reduced the amount of time spent washing a given amount of clothes, yet the average amount of time households spent washing clothes increased after 1925. This increase is partially accounted for by the fact that many urban households had previously sent their clothes to professional laundries. But the average amount of time spent washing clothes also increased for rural households with no access to professional laundries.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the time spent washing clothes increased in rural areas? - As an example of the devastation wrought on music publishers by the photocopier, one executive noted that for a recent choral festival with 1,200 singers, the festival's organizing committee purchased only 12 copies of the music published by her company that was performed as part of the festival.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the support the example lends to the executive's contention that music publishers have been devastated by the photocopier? - For the past two years at FasCorp, there has been a policy to advertise any job opening to current employees and to give no job to an applicant from outside the company if a FasCorp employee applies who is qualified for the job. This policy has been strictly followed, yet even though numerous employees of FasCorp have been qualified for any given entry-level position, some entry-level jobs have been filled with people from outside the company.
If the information provided is true, which of the following must on the basis of it also be true about FasCorp during the past two years? - Counselor: Every year a popular newsmagazine publishes a list of United States colleges, ranking them according to an overall numerical score that is a composite of ratings according to several criteria. However, the overall scores generally should not be used by students as the basis for deciding to which colleges to apply.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify the counselor's recommendation?
View More Questions
Top GRE Questions
One pen costs \(\$\)0.25 and one marker costs \(\$\)0.35. At those prices, what is the total cost of 18 pens and 100 markers?
- Working alone at its constant rate, machine A produces kkk liters of a chemical in 10 minutes. Working alone at its constant rate, machine B produces kkk liters of the chemical in 15 minutes. How many minutes does it take machines A and B, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, to produce kkk liters of the chemical?
- If the dollar amount of sales at Store P was $800,000 for 2006, what was the dollar amount of sales at that store for 2008?
- At Store T, the dollar amount of sales for 2007 was what percent of the dollar amount of sales for 2008? Give your answer to the nearest 0.1%.
- If the ratio of A to B is 3:4 and the ratio of B to C is 5:6, what is the ratio of A to C?
View More Questions