Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question asks for the author's inferred opinion about the traditional courses that the experimental course was designed to replace.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
The author's opinion is revealed through the criticisms leveled against the traditional course and the praise given to the new one. We must find the key descriptive words used for each.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
- The author criticizes the "artificial aspects of the conventional course" and its "usual procedure of assigning a large number of small problems drawn from the entire range of historical periods." This establishes that the course is "wide-ranging."
- The author states this traditional procedure only "superficially familiarizing students" with sources.
- This is contrasted with the new course, which provides an "authentic experience of literary scholarship," also described as "genuine scholarly activity."
- Putting these pieces together, the author's view is that the traditional course, because it is too broad and wide-ranging, offers only a superficial experience that doesn't feel like real, genuine scholarship.
- Option (E) captures this criticism perfectly. The wide range is the cause, and the failure to approximate genuine activity is the effect.
- (B) is incorrect; the author criticizes their focus for being too broad, not too narrow.
- (D) is a possible consequence, but (E) better describes the fundamental problem according to the author: the lack of authenticity caused by the broad-survey design.
- (A) and (C) are not directly supported by the text.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The author implies that the traditional course's attempt to cover a vast range of topics makes the experience superficial and prevents students from engaging in what feels like genuine, focused scholarly work.