Step 1: Understanding the Question.
The question asks which situation is NOT an indication for doing amniocentesis, a test that samples amniotic fluid to check for fetal chromosomal or neural tube problems.
Step 2: Key Concept.
Amniocentesis is offered when there is a real, raised risk of a chromosomal abnormality or a structural defect in the current pregnancy, based on maternal age, family history, or a past pregnancy outcome.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation.
A mother aged 35 years or more has a clearly higher risk of a chromosomally abnormal fetus, such as Down syndrome, so amniocentesis is indicated here.
Parents known to carry a chromosomal translocation can pass on an unbalanced translocation to the fetus, so prenatal chromosomal testing through amniocentesis is indicated.
A raised alpha fetoprotein level in amniotic fluid during an earlier pregnancy points to a higher chance of a neural tube defect recurring, so amniocentesis is indicated in the current pregnancy to check for this again.
The last option describes a Rh negative multipara mother, aged only 30 years, who already has two live healthy boys. There is no mention of a rising anti-D antibody titre or any past baby affected by Rh hemolytic disease. Without evidence of maternal sensitization, this situation by itself is not an indication for amniocentesis. Routine anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis, not amniocentesis, is the standard step for a Rh negative mother who is not yet sensitized.
Step 4: Final Answer.
Amniocentesis is not called for in the case of a Rh negative multipara mother aged 30 years with two live healthy boys, since there is no sign of Rh sensitization needing evaluation.