Step 1: The key phrase is benefit measured in natural units. The two economic-evaluation methods to compare are cost-effective analysis (CEA) and cost-benefit analysis (CBA).
Step 2: In cost-effective analysis, costs are in money but benefits or outcomes are in natural (clinical) units, such as life-years gained, cases prevented, or deaths averted. The most comprehensive CEA indicator is the Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY).
Step 3: In cost-benefit analysis, both costs and benefits are converted into money, not natural units, so option d is wrong.
Why not a and b: Program budgeting and network analysis are planning and scheduling tools, not outcome-valuation methods.
Ref: Park's PSM, 24th ed., Page 908.