Question:

In which landmark case did the Supreme Court hold that the 'procedure established by law' under Article 21 must be 'fair, just, and reasonable'?

Show Hint

This judgment essentially incorporated the American concept of "Due Process of Law" into the Indian legal framework.
Updated On: Jun 5, 2026
  • Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan
  • K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
  • M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
  • Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Concept: The interpretation of Article 21 ("Right to Life and Personal Liberty") underwent a revolutionary change through judicial activism in the late 1970s.

Step 1: Understanding the 'Maneka Gandhi' doctrine.
Prior to this case, courts took a literal interpretation of "procedure established by law." In *Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India* (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that any procedure enacted by the State must pass the test of being fair, just, and reasonable.

Step 2: Significance.
This ruling linked Article 21 with Articles 14 and 19, creating a "golden triangle" of rights that restricts arbitrary state action. equation Landmark Case for Fair Procedure = Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India equation center Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India center
Was this answer helpful?
0
0