Question:
In which case the Supreme Court held that Laws in the Ninth Schedule are not having any immunity from judicial review?
In which case the Supreme Court held that Laws in the Ninth Schedule are not having any immunity from judicial review?
Show Hint
This case was pivotal in interpreting the relationship between fundamental rights and laws in the Ninth Schedule.
Updated On: Apr 15, 2025
- Jagmohan Singh v. State of U.P.
- Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain
- I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu
- In Re Berubari case
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
In the case of I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007), the Supreme Court ruled that laws in the Ninth Schedule are not immune from judicial review and can be challenged on grounds of violation of fundamental rights.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top AP LAWCET Legal Studies Questions
- Lok Adalats have been created under ____.
- Equality of Opportunity in matters of Public Employment is discussed in ____.
- How many times the President of India can seek re-election to his post?
- Which of the given Schedule of the Indian Constitution is included the "Gram Panchayats"?
- Which one of the following dealt with the subject of Local Self Government?
View More Questions
Top AP LAWCET Judicial Reforms Questions
Top AP LAWCET Questions
- ____ is the chairperson of Securities and Exchange Board of India, as of April 2024.
- ____ is the current chief minister of Tamil Nadu.
- ____ is the current Governor of Odisha.
- ____ is the current president of National Company Law Tribunal.
- Which entity developed and constructed India’s first hydrogen fuel cell ferry?
View More Questions