Question:
In which case, one L.K.G. student (minor) filed a PIL through his guardian seeking the removal of a country liquor shop located next to his school premises?
In which case, one L.K.G. student (minor) filed a PIL through his guardian seeking the removal of a country liquor shop located next to his school premises?
Show Hint
PILs filed by unusual petitioners, such as young children, often become notable cases that highlight important social issues and test the boundaries of access to justice.
Updated On: Jun 13, 2025
- Master Yuvraj Sunil Nanavare (minor) v. State of Maharashtra (2019)
- Priyanshu (minor) v. State of U.P. (2021)
- Master Atharva (minor) and anr v. State of UP and Ors. (2020)
- Master Vinayak (minor) v. NCT of Delhi (2024)
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
This question refers to a unique Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that gained media attention.
The case where an LKG student, acting through his father as a guardian, filed a PIL challenging the location of a liquor shop near his school was Master Atharva (minor) v.
State of UP.
The PIL was heard by the Allahabad High Court in 2020.
The court took the matter seriously, highlighting the importance of state rules that prohibit the location of liquor shops near educational institutions and places of worship, and directed the authorities to take appropriate action.
The case where an LKG student, acting through his father as a guardian, filed a PIL challenging the location of a liquor shop near his school was Master Atharva (minor) v.
State of UP.
The PIL was heard by the Allahabad High Court in 2020.
The court took the matter seriously, highlighting the importance of state rules that prohibit the location of liquor shops near educational institutions and places of worship, and directed the authorities to take appropriate action.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top TS PGLCET Legal Studies Questions
- Which of the following is considered as a "ground" for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?
- Under which of the following Acts is the "Right to Information" law enacted in India?
- Which of the following is the primary objective of the "Public Interest Litigation" (PIL) in India?
- In the case of "Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala" (1973), the Supreme Court of India ruled that:
- Which of the following is NOT a valid contract under Indian law?
View More Questions
Top TS PGLCET Constitutional Laws Questions
- In Sukanya Shantha v. Union of India (2024), the Supreme Court held that _________.
- The Supreme Court has overruled its decision in E. V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004) relating to sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) for reservation purposes, in which case?
- In which case, the SC held that right to digital access is an intrinsic component of right to life and liberty, and directed the State to proactively design and implement inclusive digital ecosystems that serve not only the privileged but also the marginalized?
- The Supreme Court recently in a landmark decision has held that governor's delay in granting assent to 10 bills as erroneous and illegal, and granted assent to the Bills. Which provision of the Constitution was interpreted primarily in this case?
- In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court has held that not all privately owned property is a "material resource of the community" in an 8:1 majority?
View More Questions
Top TS PGLCET Questions
- Which of the following is considered as a "ground" for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?
- Under which of the following Acts is the "Right to Information" law enacted in India?
- Which of the following is the primary objective of the "Public Interest Litigation" (PIL) in India?
- In the case of "Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala" (1973), the Supreme Court of India ruled that:
- Which of the following is NOT a valid contract under Indian law?
View More Questions