Step 1: Recall what each algorithm actually does.
K-Medoid is a partitioning algorithm that groups similar data points into clusters around representative "medoid" points, it is a clustering method.
Naive Bayes is a probabilistic classifier that assigns a class label to a data point using Bayes' theorem with a "naive" independence assumption between features, it is a classification method.
Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is a family of algorithms used to draw samples from a complicated probability distribution when direct sampling is hard, it is a sampling method.
Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) projects data onto a lower-dimensional space chosen to best separate classes, it is primarily used as a feature extraction/dimensionality reduction method (though it can also assist classification).
Step 2: Match each task to the algorithm designed for it.
T1 - Clustering needs an algorithm that groups unlabeled data by similarity, this is K-Medoid (A2). So T1:A2.
T2 - Classification needs an algorithm that assigns class labels, this is Naive Bayes (A4). So T2:A4.
T3 - Sampling needs an algorithm for drawing samples from a distribution, this is MCMC (A1). So T3:A1.
T4 - Feature Extraction needs an algorithm for reducing/transforming features, this is LDA (A3). So T4:A3.
Step 3: Compare with each option.
Option (A), T1:A4 wrongly pairs Clustering with Naive Bayes (a classifier, not a clustering method), so (A) is wrong.
Option (B), T1:A2, T2:A4, T3:A1, T4:A3, matches exactly what we derived in Step 2.
Option (C), T1:A3 wrongly pairs Clustering with LDA (a feature extraction tool, not a clustering method), so (C) is wrong.
Option (D), T2:A2 wrongly pairs Classification with K-Medoid (a clustering method, not a classifier), so (D) is wrong.
Final Answer:
Only option (B) gives the correct matching for all four tasks.
\[ \boxed{\text{Option (B): T1:A2, T2:A4, T3:A1, T4:A3}} \]