In an enzymatic reaction, an inhibitor (I) competes with the substrate (S) to bind with the enzyme (E), thereby reducing the rate of product (P) formation. The competitive inhibition follows the reaction mechanism shown below. Let [S] and [I] be the concentration of S and I, respectively, and $r_s$ be the rate of consumption of S. Assuming pseudo-steady state, the correct plot of $\frac{1}{-r_s}$ vs $\frac{1}{[S]}$ is


Step 1: Write the Lineweaver–Burk form.
For competitive inhibition, the rate equation becomes:
\[
\frac{1}{r_s} = \frac{K_m\left(1+\frac{[I]}{K_I}\right)}{V_{\max}} \cdot \frac{1}{[S]} + \frac{1}{V_{\max}}
\]
Important features:
– The slope increases with increasing inhibitor concentration (because slope $\propto 1 + \frac{[I]}{K_I}$).
– The y-intercept stays constant because $V_{\max}$ does not change.
Step 2: Interpret the graph.
In competitive inhibition, Lineweaver–Burk plots show lines that:
– intersect at the same y-intercept, and
– have increasing slopes as inhibitor concentration [I] increases.
Step 3: Match with the options.
Among the given plots, option (A) correctly shows:
– a common y-intercept (same $1/V_{\max}$),
– higher slopes for increasing inhibitor concentration.
Therefore, option (A) matches the expected behavior of competitive inhibition.
Final Answer: (A)
Reactant A decomposes to products B and C in the presence of an enzyme in a well-stirred batch reactor. The kinetic rate expression is given by
\[ -r_A = \frac{0.01 C_A}{0.05 + C_A} \, \text{(mol L}^{-1} \text{min}^{-1}) \] If the initial concentration of A is 0.02 mol L\(^{-1}\), the time taken to achieve 50% conversion of A is \(\underline{\hspace{1cm}}\) min (rounded to 2 decimal places).