The question involves evaluating the relationship between the assertion and reason provided, both of which pertain to periodic trends in the covalent radius of elements down a group in the periodic table. To answer this, we need to examine the concepts involved.
Thus, the correct response is that while both statements are true, the reason does not adequately explain the assertion.
Step 1. Analyze the Assertion (A): The increase in covalent radius from N to P is significant due to additional electron shells. However, from A to B, the increase in size is smaller because of the presence of poor shielding by d- and f-electrons.
Step 2. Analyze the Reason (R): The statement in (R) is generally true as covalent and ionic radii tend to increase down the group in the periodic table. However, this reason does not specifically explain the smaller increase observed from A to B.
Step 3. Conclusion: Although both statements are individually true, the reason provided does not correctly explain the observed trend in covalent radii from A to B.
Which of the following element pairs will form an ionic bond? 
Two p-n junction diodes \(D_1\) and \(D_2\) are connected as shown in the figure. \(A\) and \(B\) are input signals and \(C\) is the output. The given circuit will function as a _______. 
A substance 'X' (1.5 g) dissolved in 150 g of a solvent 'Y' (molar mass = 300 g mol$^{-1}$) led to an elevation of the boiling point by 0.5 K. The relative lowering in the vapour pressure of the solvent 'Y' is $____________ \(\times 10^{-2}\). (nearest integer)
[Given : $K_{b}$ of the solvent = 5.0 K kg mol$^{-1}$]
Assume the solution to be dilute and no association or dissociation of X takes place in solution.