Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks for the ideal design parameter for the length of a summit curve on a two-lane, two-way highway, with the specific goal of ensuring "full operational efficiency," which is explicitly linked to "overtaking opportunities."
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let's analyze the given parameters in the context of summit curve design:
- Lateral friction (f) and Centrifugal acceleration (\(a_c\)): These parameters are primarily considered in the design of horizontal curves to counteract the centrifugal force as a vehicle negotiates a bend. They are not the primary design criteria for vertical (summit) curves.
- Stopping Sight Distance (SSD): This is the minimum sight distance required for a driver to see an object on the roadway, react, and bring the vehicle to a safe stop. The length of any curve, including a summit curve, must at a minimum provide the required SSD for safety. It is a fundamental safety requirement, but not the ideal for operational efficiency.
- Overtaking Sight Distance (OSD): This is the minimum sight distance required for the driver of a vehicle to safely overtake another vehicle moving at a lower speed, without causing a collision with an oncoming vehicle. Providing OSD allows for overtaking maneuvers, which significantly improves the traffic flow and operational efficiency of a two-lane, two-way highway.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The question specifies the goal is "full operational efficiency (overtaking opportunities)." While SSD is a mandatory minimum for safety, the ideal design parameter to achieve this stated goal is the Overtaking Sight Distance (OSD). Therefore, the length of the summit curve should ideally be based on OSD.