Comprehension
Following the transition to democracy, with the inauguration of Nelson Mandela as president in I994, South Africa was faced with the task of dealing with its past, as well as undertaking some action to deal with structural social injustice. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), heralded as the most ambitious and organised attempt to deal with crimes of a past regime through a concept of truth, came into force on 19th July I995 in South Africa. Emerging as a political strategy to acknowledge past suffering whilst promoting a future based on the concerns of social justice, the rule of law and reconciliation, the Commission has struggled to fulfil its objectives. Although the TRC incorporated these broader concerns into the mandate of its three sub-committees, they were disregarded in practice. These sub-committees, which reflected concerns for ‘human rights violations’, ‘amnesty’ and ‘reparation and rehabilitation’, were not ‘coupled with some form of social transformation’. The public transition from apartheid, established through a negotiated settlement rather than a revolutionary process, framed the Commission’s powers. Shaped by the historical context of this particular transition, the TRC was careful not to ‘rock the structural boat’. Rather than pursuing truth and justice, as an integrated feature of social transformation, the Commissioners and, to a greater extent, the government of South Africa, maintained an agenda that avoided a challenge to the status quo. A focus on restorative justice was taken by the Commission with an emphasis placed on mechanisms to restore victims and survivors, through reparations policy, state-led acknowledgement of suffering, and a condemnation, together with the transformation, of the system that implemented such widespread forms of abuse. The priority of changing the apartheid conditions of gross inequality and oppression provided a backdrop to the approval of the TRC by those who had suffered. More difficult to accept was the provision of amnesty to those who had undertaken violations of human rights. The process placed amnesty of violations as a carrot to perpetrators in exchange for a full story, with the stick of prosecutions for those who did not come forward.
Question: 1
‘The status quo’ as used in the passage means
‘The status quo’ as used in the passage means
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- Previously popular opinions.
- Already existing conditions
- Strategies of government.
- Following a set agenda.
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Approach Solution - 1
The correct Answer is (B):Already existing conditions
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks for the meaning of the status quo as it is used in the passage, describing what the TRC was careful not to disturb.
- A) Previously popular opinions: Status quo is not about what people believed or preferred in the past; it refers to a state of affairs, a set of conditions, rather than a set of opinions.
- B) Already existing conditions: Status quo is a standard term for the existing state of affairs at a given time, the arrangement of society, power, and structure as it currently stands. The passage uses it to describe the structural setup of South African society that the TRC avoided challenging, which matches this meaning directly.
- C) Strategies of government: A strategy is a planned course of action, while status quo refers to a condition or arrangement that already exists, whether or not any strategy created it. These are different ideas, so this option confuses a plan with a state of affairs.
- D) Following a set agenda: An agenda is a list of planned actions or items to address, which is again about intended future action, not about the current state of affairs that status quo describes.
Since the passage uses status quo to describe the structural setup that the TRC was careful not to disturb, the meaning that fits is the existing, current state of conditions.
The correct answer is B) Already existing conditions.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
Which of the following best describes the tone of the author?
Which of the following best describes the tone of the author?
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- Optimistic
- Threatening
- Compassionate
- Critical
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Approach Solution - 1
The correct Answer is (D):Critical
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
This question asks us to identify the author's attitude toward the subject discussed, in this case an evaluation of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's actual performance against its stated aims.
- Optimistic: An optimistic tone would present the commission's work in a hopeful, forward-looking light, treating its shortcomings as minor or easily fixed. The passage instead points to concerns the commission failed to address and structural weaknesses in how it operated, which rules out a hopeful reading.
- Threatening: A threatening tone would involve the author warning of consequences or issuing a caution to a specific party. Nothing here suggests the author is threatening anyone; the author is assessing the commission's record, not warning it.
- Compassionate: Compassion would show up as sympathy for victims or for the commission's difficult task, expressed gently. The focus on gaps, ignored concerns and a lack of resolve reads as an assessment of failure, not an expression of sympathy.
- Critical: A critical tone points out faults and shortcomings directly. The author highlights that the commission overlooked some of its broader concerns and lacked the strength to challenge the conditions it was meant to address, which is exactly what a critical assessment looks like.
The language centers on what the commission failed to do rather than what it achieved, so the author is evaluating it unfavourably rather than praising, warning, or sympathising.
Hence, the correct answer is Critical.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
Which of the following is not the broader concern of Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC)?
Which of the following is not the broader concern of Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC)?
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- To deal with crimes of a past regime through a concept of truth.
- To acknowledge past suffering.
- To emerge as a political strategy for reconciliation of rule of law.
- To promote a future based on the concerns of social justice.
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
The correct Answer is (C):To emerge as a political strategy for reconciliation of rule of law.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
This question asks which option does NOT belong among the broader concerns attributed to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
- To deal with crimes of a past regime through a concept of truth: Establishing an official record of what happened under a previous regime, built around acknowledging the truth of past crimes, is a core stated concern of a truth commission, so this is one of its broader concerns.
- To acknowledge past suffering: Giving formal recognition to what victims suffered is central to why such commissions are set up in the first place, so this too belongs among its broader concerns.
- To emerge as a political strategy for reconciliation of rule of law: This option reframes the commission's purpose as a calculated political manoeuvre tied to the rule of law, rather than a process of truth-telling and justice. That framing does not match its stated aims, which makes this the option that does not belong.
- To promote a future based on the concerns of social justice: Looking ahead to a fairer social order is consistent with the forward-looking purpose typically assigned to such commissions, so this is also one of its stated concerns.
Three of the four options describe genuine aims tied to truth-telling, acknowledgment and future justice, while the third recasts the commission as a political strategy, which is not how its broader concerns are framed.
Hence, the correct answer is To emerge as a political strategy for reconciliation of rule of law.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4
Which of the following statements is least likely to be inferred from the passage?
Which of the following statements is least likely to be inferred from the passage?
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- The TRC ignored some of the broad concerns.
- The sub-committees of TRC lacked an agenda of social transformation
- The TRC made earnest efforts to protect human rights.
- The TRC lacked the desire and strength to challenge the prevailing conditions.
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
The correct Answer is (C): The TRC made earnest efforts to protect human rights.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
This question asks which statement is NOT supported as an inference about the commission's actual conduct.
- The TRC ignored some of the broad concerns: This matches a criticism raised directly elsewhere, so it is something that can reasonably be inferred.
- The sub-committees of TRC lacked an agenda of social transformation: This is also consistent with the picture of a commission whose working units fell short of a genuinely transformative mandate, so it is inferable too.
- The TRC made earnest efforts to protect human rights: This is a positive, credit-giving statement, but the overall assessment is one of a commission that fell short of its aims rather than one that earnestly succeeded at protecting rights. This contradicts the critical picture built up elsewhere, making it the least supported inference.
- The TRC lacked the desire and strength to challenge the prevailing conditions: This lines up with the critical assessment of the commission's limited resolve, so it is a reasonable inference.
Three of the four statements describe the commission's shortcomings, which are well supported, while the third credits the commission with genuine success on human rights, which runs against that critical picture.
Hence, the correct answer is The TRC made earnest efforts to protect human rights.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5
What does ‘amnesty’ mean in the context of the passage?
What does ‘amnesty’ mean in the context of the passage?
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
- Severe punishment
- Bring legal action
- Arrest warrants
- Official pardon
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Approach Solution - 1
The correct Answer is (D):Official pardon
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
This question tests the meaning of the word "amnesty" as it would be used in a discussion of a commission dealing with the aftermath of a past regime.
- Severe punishment: Amnesty is the opposite of punishment; it involves setting aside penalties rather than imposing harsh ones, so this option reverses the actual meaning.
- Bring legal action: Bringing legal action means starting a prosecution, which again runs opposite to amnesty, since amnesty typically halts or forgives prosecution rather than initiating it.
- Arrest warrants: An arrest warrant is a legal order to detain someone, which is a step toward punishment, not away from it, so this does not match amnesty either.
- Official pardon: Amnesty is a formal decision by an authority to forgive or overlook past offences, which is exactly what an official pardon means. This matches the term's standard usage in discussions of transitional justice and reconciliation.
Amnesty describes forgiveness granted by an authority rather than any form of punishment or legal action against a person, which is why only one option fits.
Hence, the correct answer is Official pardon.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top CLAT Questions
- In the realm of contemporary literature, the interplay between character and setting is a nuanced dance that shapes the narrative’s essence. The setting, often described with painstaking detail, becomes more than a backdrop; it becomes a character, influencing the plot and character development.
Consider, for instance, the barren expanse of the desert in Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake. The arid landscape mirrors the sense of isolation felt by the protagonist, Gogol, as he navigates his identity crisis in a foreign land. The relentless sun and vast sands are not mere descriptions; they are the silent witnesses to his inner turmoil.
On the other end of the literary spectrum, there is Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. The lush, vibrant Kerala backwaters are not just the setting; they are a character woven into the fabric of the story. The teeming, humid landscape reflects the complex web of human relationships and secrets that unravel in the narrative. This interplay is not confined to contemporary literature alone. In Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy Macbeth, the eerie and foreboding setting of the Scottish moors casts a dark shadow over the characters’ actions. The moors, shrouded in mist and mystery, serve as an ever-present omen of the impending tragedy. - The crisis of justice that is the subject matter of discussion in the media today is in fact the crisis of “justice for the middle class”. The main difference between India and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries is that whereas the middle class in these countries has reasonable access to justice, in India it does not. A vocal and powerful middle class has emerged in India since 1991. It is demanding reasonable access to justice. Much of the judicial reform effort will help meet this demand…
The question of justice for the poor is, however, an altogether different challenge. No country in the world has been able to secure justice for the poor. Most of the jails of the richest countries are filled with the poorest. The “masses” are more often victims of the criminal justice system than of crime. In India as well, jails are almost exclusively filled with the poor. The civil justice system is hardly accessible to them. They are often victimised by lawyers, touts and court staff. They are docket-excluded, a new type of untouchability. The language and the logic—and the colonial and feudal culture—of the judicial system are alien to them. It rarely takes cognisance of their needs and interests.
Their main concern, therefore, is to escape the attention of the justice system, criminal and civil. A landless Dalit person in the interior of Madhya Pradesh once gave me an insightful definition of a court from the perspective of the masses: “A court is a place where you are forcibly taken by the police to be punished; no one goes to a court.” In contrast, many lawyers and judges colloquially define a court as “a temple of justice where rights are protected”.
These sharply divergent visions mean that justice for one section is often injustice for another. Protecting the livelihood of traditional taxi and auto drivers from predatory pricing by corporate app-based taxi providers by imaginatively using the available tools of law to delay their incursion would be seen by the rich and by sections of the middle class as a failure of the judicial system, and possibly as also resulting in a downgrading of the “ease of doing business” measure. However, the masses would see such a judicial intervention as strong evidence of a good justice system. Although the conflict over competing visions of the nation and conflicting demands from social and economic segments have confined judicial reform of judicial administration mainly to “neutral” areas such as process reform, procedural law, technology, planning and court and case management, judge strength, and the workload of judges, there has been considerable improvement in these areas, and the judicial system has improved its performance.
[Extracted, with edits, from “Justice and the Two Ideas of India”, by G. Mohan Gopal, Frontline] - Everything she wanted was here, at Carignano, in Kasauli. Here, on the ridge of the mountain, in this quiet house. It was the place, and the time of life, that she had wanted and prepared for all her life-as she realized on the first day at Carignano, with a great, cool flowering of relief - and at last she had it. She wanted no one and nothing else. Whatever else came, or happened here, would be an unwelcome intrusion and distraction. This she tried to convey to the plodding postman with a cold and piercing stare from the height of the ridge onto his honest bull back. Unfortunately, he did not look up at her on the hilltop but stared stolidly down at the dust piling onto his shoes as he plodded on. A bullock-man, an oafish ox, she thought bitterly. She stepped backwards into the garden and the wind suddenly billowed up and threw the pine branches about as though to curtain her. She was grey, tall and thin and her silk sari made a sweeping, shivering sound and she fancied she could merge with the pine trees and be mistaken for one. To be a tree, no more and no less, was all she was prepared to undertake.
What pleased and satisfied her so, here at Carignano, was its barrenness. This was the chief virtue of all Kasauli of course-its starkness. It had rocks, it had pines, it had light and air. In every direction there was a sweeping view - to the north, of the mountains, to the south, of the plains. Occasionally an eagle swam through this clear unobstructed mass of light and air, that was all. And Carignano, her home on the ridge, had no more than that. Why should it? The sun shone on its white walls. Its windows were open the ones facing north opened on to the blue waves of the Himalayas flowing out and up to the line of ice and snow sketched upon the sky, while those that faced south looked down the plunging cliff to the plain stretching out, flat and sere to the blurred horizon.
Yes, there were some apricot trees close to the house. There were clumps of iris that had finished blooming. There was the kitchen with a wing of smoke lifting out of its chimney and a stack of wood outside its door. But these were incidental, almost unimportant.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “Fire on the Mountain” by Anita Desai] - English literature is a vast and diverse field that has left an indelible mark on the world of letters. From the eloquent plays of William Shakespeare to the complex novels of Jane Austen and the profound poetry of William Wordsworth, English literature offers a window into the human experience. One of the luminaries of English literature is William Shakespeare, often hailed as the greatest playwright in the history of English language. His works, including Hamlet, Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet, are celebrated for their exploration of human nature, love, ambition, and tragedy. His characters, such as the tormented Hamlet and the star-crossed lovers Romeo and Juliet, continue to captivate readers and audiences worldwide.
The 19th century ushered in a new era of literary giants. Jane Austen’s novels, such as Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility, provide incisive social commentary through the lens of wit and romance. Austen’s heroines, like Elizabeth Bennet and Elinor Dashwood, remain beloved literary figures known for their intelligence and resilience. The Romantic era brought forth poets like William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who celebrated * 8 UG the beauty of nature and the emotional intensity of the individual. Wordsworth’s ‘‘I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud’’ and Coleridge’s ‘‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’’ are testament to the power of the written words to evoke profound emotions and imagery. Moving towards 20th century, English literature continued to evolve. Virginia Woolf’s ground-breaking novel Mrs. Dalloway explored the inner thoughts and lives of its characters with a modernist narrative style. Dystopian visions, as seen in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four provided stark warnings about the dangers of totalitarianism and the erosion of individual freedom.
Today, English literature is a global phenomenon, transcending borders and languages. Indian authors like Arundhati Roy, with her novel The God of Small Things, have won prestigious international literary awards. The book not only explores intricate family dynamics but also delves into the broader socio-political landscape of India. In summary, English literature is a testament to the enduring power of storytelling and the written word. It encompasses an array of authors, themes, and styles that continue to captivate and inspire readers across the world. - On the evening of the 10th, General Dyer arrived at Amritsar, and the Deputy-Commissioner handed over the civil power to him. He issued a proclamation by word of mouth that no meetings should be held. Two days later, after there had been no sort of riot, nor murder, General Dyer heard that a meeting was to be held at the Jallianwala Bagh. He proceeded there with about fifty troops, half British, half Indian, and a certain number of Ghurkas, armed with their kukris. The Jallianwala Bagh is an open space, half a mile square, which has one entry wide enough for three persons. The troops got in and lined up on a mound of debris. The walls, seven feet high, and the surrounding houses enclosed the people. There were, too, three alleys through which the people might have been able to pass. Within thirty seconds of the troops getting in, General Dyer gave orders to fire, and the crowd of people, estimated at anything from 5,000 to 20,000, who were sitting on the ground peacefully listening to the mob oratory, were fired on. The result of the troops’ fire into the mass of people we do not know. But we do know that Dyer’s own estimate of the casualties resulting from ten minutes continual individual firing, was 400 to 500 killed and 1,500 wounded. The people were not able to escape. They were people who had not offered any violence and who had not been warned. These people were shot down. After ten minutes, the ammunition was exhausted and the troops marched off, and they left 1,500 wounded there. There were men lying there for two days, dying of thirst, eating the ground, bleeding to death and nobody to look after them. Those who lived nearby came and carried away some of the wounded from the heap of dead and dying, but the unfortunate country people died there miserably of their wounds. This is what is done in 1919 in British India…
Centuries hence you will find Indian children brought up to this spot, just as they visit now the Cawnpore Well, and you can imagine the feelings of these Indians for generations over this terrible business.
[Col. Wedgwood, MP, speaking in the British Parliament, 22 December 1919]
View More Questions