Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
Given that Orlando is the driver, we need to determine which of the conditional statements ("If P, then Q") is a logical certainty. A conditional statement is true if the conclusion (Q) is true whenever the premise (P) is true, or if the premise (P) is false.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
1. Analyze the main condition: Orlando is the driver. He speaks Italian and Russian. His passenger must share a language with him.
Passenger can be Shelly (share Russian).
Passenger can be Theo (share Italian).
2. Identify the two possible scenarios:
Scenario 1: Front seat is (Orlando, Shelly). The back seat contains the remaining people: Mohsen, Theo, and Ursula.
Scenario 2: Front seat is (Orlando, Theo). The back seat contains the remaining people: Mohsen, Shelly, and Ursula.
3. Evaluate each conditional option:
(A) If Shelly sits in the front seat, Ursula will sit in the middle position in the back seat.
The "if" part corresponds to Scenario 1.
In this scenario, the back seat has Mohsen (F, H), Theo (G, I), and Ursula (F, G, H).
To arrange them side-by-side, we check shared languages: Mohsen-Ursula (Farsi/Hebrew), Theo-Ursula (German). Mohsen and Theo have no shared language.
Therefore, Ursula MUST sit in the middle to connect Mohsen and Theo. The arrangements can be (Mohsen, Ursula, Theo) or (Theo, Ursula, Mohsen).
The conclusion "Ursula will sit in the middle" is true for this scenario. So the conditional statement is true.
(B) If Shelly sits in the back seat, she will sit next to Ursula.
The "if" part corresponds to Scenario 2.
In this scenario, the back seat has Mohsen (F, H), Shelly (H, R), and Ursula (F, G, H). All three can be paired with each other (M-S: Hebrew, S-U: Hebrew, M-U: Farsi/Hebrew).
A possible arrangement is (Mohsen, Shelly, Ursula). Here Shelly is not next to Ursula.
Since the conclusion is not always true when the premise is true, the conditional statement is not a "must be true" statement.
(C) If Theo sits in the front seat, Ursula will sit in the middle position in the back seat.
The "if" part corresponds to Scenario 2.
The back seat has Mohsen, Shelly, and Ursula.
The conclusion is "Ursula will sit in the middle". However, an arrangement like (Shelly, Mohsen, Ursula) is valid, where Mohsen is in the middle.
The conclusion is not guaranteed.
(D) If Theo sits in the back seat, he will sit between Mohsen and Ursula.
The "if" part corresponds to Scenario 1.
As analyzed in (A), in this case, Ursula must be in the middle, between Mohsen and Theo. The statement says Theo is between Mohsen and Ursula, which is false.
(E) If Ursula sits in the back seat, she will sit in the middle position in the back seat.
The "if" part, "Ursula sits in the back seat", is true in both Scenario 1 and Scenario 2.
The conclusion, "she will sit in the middle", must therefore be true in both scenarios.
It is true for Scenario 1. However, as shown in (C), for Scenario 2, she does not have to be in the middle.
Since it's not true for all cases, the statement is not a "must be true" statement.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Only statement (A) holds true as a logical necessity under the condition that Orlando is the driver.