Question:
DIRECTIONS for questions 33 to 36: Choose the option that correctly un-scrambles the paragraphs below.
1. The same is true for less fraught examples: dispensing with 'Truth' does not mean dispensing with accuracy and attention to detail, and to suggest for example that the colonization of the New World never happened would be equally untenable.
2. To relinquish 'Truth' and the idea of one history does not lead to absolute relativism, where any version of events is taken as being equally valid as any other.
3. It does not, for example, give succour to those charlatans and ideologues who seek to deny that the Holocaust ever happened.
4. What I am suggesting here is complex, but its importance demands a careful reading.
5. The evidence for the systematic murder of more than six million people by the Nazis is overwhelming.
6. To try to argue that it never occurred is to violate the voices of the past, to suppress that evidence which goes against the twisted thesis.
DIRECTIONS for questions 33 to 36: Choose the option that correctly un-scrambles the paragraphs below.
1. The same is true for less fraught examples: dispensing with 'Truth' does not mean dispensing with accuracy and attention to detail, and to suggest for example that the colonization of the New World never happened would be equally untenable.
2. To relinquish 'Truth' and the idea of one history does not lead to absolute relativism, where any version of events is taken as being equally valid as any other.
3. It does not, for example, give succour to those charlatans and ideologues who seek to deny that the Holocaust ever happened.
4. What I am suggesting here is complex, but its importance demands a careful reading.
5. The evidence for the systematic murder of more than six million people by the Nazis is overwhelming.
6. To try to argue that it never occurred is to violate the voices of the past, to suppress that evidence which goes against the twisted thesis.
1. The same is true for less fraught examples: dispensing with 'Truth' does not mean dispensing with accuracy and attention to detail, and to suggest for example that the colonization of the New World never happened would be equally untenable.
2. To relinquish 'Truth' and the idea of one history does not lead to absolute relativism, where any version of events is taken as being equally valid as any other.
3. It does not, for example, give succour to those charlatans and ideologues who seek to deny that the Holocaust ever happened.
4. What I am suggesting here is complex, but its importance demands a careful reading.
5. The evidence for the systematic murder of more than six million people by the Nazis is overwhelming.
6. To try to argue that it never occurred is to violate the voices of the past, to suppress that evidence which goes against the twisted thesis.
Show Hint
Find the sentence stating the main claim first, then follow the back-referencing words like "It" and "The same is true" to chain the rest.
Updated On: Jul 13, 2026
- 2-3-5-6-1-4
- 5-6-1-2-4-3
- 4-2-3-5-6-1
- 2-4-5-3-6-1
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Question.
We have six sentences about giving up the idea of a single 'Truth' in history, and we must arrange them into one coherent paragraph. To do this, find the sentence that states the main idea first, then trace how each later sentence builds on the one before it.
Step 2: Key Approach.
Look for pronouns and phrases that point backward, such as "It", "The same is true", and "To try to argue", since these can only follow the specific idea they are referring to. Also look for a sentence that clearly wraps up the paragraph.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation.
Sentence 2 makes the core claim of the paragraph: giving up 'Truth' does not mean falling into relativism, where every account of events is treated as equally valid. This is the natural opening line.
Sentence 3 begins with "It does not, for example", where "It" refers back to the relativism just denied in sentence 2, and gives a first concrete example: denying relativism does not mean giving support to Holocaust deniers. So sentence 3 follows sentence 2.
Sentence 5 backs this up with a fact: "The evidence for the systematic murder of more than six million people by the Nazis is overwhelming." This naturally follows the mention of Holocaust denial in sentence 3.
Sentence 6 continues the thought, saying that to argue the Holocaust never happened is to go against this evidence and "violate the voices of the past", directly building on the evidence stated in sentence 5.
Sentence 1 then opens with "The same is true for less fraught examples", which needs a first example already on the table, exactly what sentences 3, 5 and 6 provided with the Holocaust. Sentence 1 then adds a second example, the colonization of the New World, generalising the point.
Sentence 4, "What I am suggesting here is complex, but its importance demands a careful reading", works as a closing remark once both examples have been given, summing up the whole argument rather than starting it.
Put together, this gives the order 2-3-5-6-1-4, which is option 1.
Step 4: Final Answer.
The correctly arranged paragraph reads 2-3-5-6-1-4, so the answer is option 1.
We have six sentences about giving up the idea of a single 'Truth' in history, and we must arrange them into one coherent paragraph. To do this, find the sentence that states the main idea first, then trace how each later sentence builds on the one before it.
Step 2: Key Approach.
Look for pronouns and phrases that point backward, such as "It", "The same is true", and "To try to argue", since these can only follow the specific idea they are referring to. Also look for a sentence that clearly wraps up the paragraph.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation.
Sentence 2 makes the core claim of the paragraph: giving up 'Truth' does not mean falling into relativism, where every account of events is treated as equally valid. This is the natural opening line.
Sentence 3 begins with "It does not, for example", where "It" refers back to the relativism just denied in sentence 2, and gives a first concrete example: denying relativism does not mean giving support to Holocaust deniers. So sentence 3 follows sentence 2.
Sentence 5 backs this up with a fact: "The evidence for the systematic murder of more than six million people by the Nazis is overwhelming." This naturally follows the mention of Holocaust denial in sentence 3.
Sentence 6 continues the thought, saying that to argue the Holocaust never happened is to go against this evidence and "violate the voices of the past", directly building on the evidence stated in sentence 5.
Sentence 1 then opens with "The same is true for less fraught examples", which needs a first example already on the table, exactly what sentences 3, 5 and 6 provided with the Holocaust. Sentence 1 then adds a second example, the colonization of the New World, generalising the point.
Sentence 4, "What I am suggesting here is complex, but its importance demands a careful reading", works as a closing remark once both examples have been given, summing up the whole argument rather than starting it.
Put together, this gives the order 2-3-5-6-1-4, which is option 1.
Step 4: Final Answer.
The correctly arranged paragraph reads 2-3-5-6-1-4, so the answer is option 1.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top XAT Verbal and Logical Ability Questions
- Read the following sentences carefully.
1) I went to Delhi by train because all the flights were running full.
2) He was on a train to Delhi when he heard the news
3) I am ashamed at my behaviour
4) The key for efficiency is to plan ahead
5) The police say she benefits the most with his death
6) He is always short of money and keep borrowing from friends Choose the option having all the correct sentences. - Read the following passage carefully and Answer the question that follows.
The August wildfire that roared through the town of Lahaina in Hawaii burned so hot that some of the dead were effectively cremated, their bones combusting to unidentifiable ash. Other bodies may have been lost in the Pacific Ocean, into which many of those fleeing the inferno were forced to plunge. As of Sept. 22, 97 people have been confirmed dead, but the Maui Police Department still lists 22 people as missing. That’s a common pattern in the aftermath of disasters. In Morocco, families are still desperately searching for hundreds of loved ones after a devastating earthquake, while thousands in Libya are missing after two dams collapsed in a heavy rainstorm. Climate change has supercharged the kind of deadly weather that creates disappearances. In March, over 500 Malawians were presumed dead after being buried in mudslides unleashed by the exceptionally intense Cyclone Freddy. For families of the missing, disappearance is a special kind of indefinite hell. In a wealthy country like the United States, victims of disaster tend to be quickly tallied and searched for. But poorer nations, which are already more vulnerable to the damage wrought by climate change, often don’t have the resources to follow through. We need to fund measures for these countries that both prevent disappearances through emergency preparedness and also resolve them by promptly identifying bodies. - Tech nostalgia tends to look wrong-headed eventually, whether it longs for the days before Gutenberg, or before daily newspapers, or before Twitter. We need to work against the ways that our minds have been systematically ‘rewired’ to align with the interests of tech giants, polluters and even a culture of overparenting. We can’t truly opt out of the age of distraction by, say, ditching the smartphone. Indeed, we will still worry, as we should, about how our minds interact with external things. But together we should imagine a future of more conscientious thinking, not a past.
Which of the following would be the most meaningful conclusion of the passage? - Which of the following sentences have the CORRECT usage of punctuation?
- There are about 50, 000 houses and apartments bought in a year in Bangalore. That means an average of 125 houses are bought every day in the city. But it is also a fact that more than a thousand people view houses for sale every day. This means that people who view houses for sale are just wasting the time of the brokers or house owners as they have no intention of buying.
Which of the following, if true,weakens the argument most?
View More Questions
Top XAT Para Jumbles Questions
- Arrange the following into a meaningful sequence:
1) He also explains why he believes that social media should come with more guardrails.
2) Focusing on a trend in which tic disorders seem to spread via TikTok videos, Bartholomew breaks down why this ‘placebo effect in reverse’ can still cause genuine illness
3) In Believing Is Seeing, Robert Bartholomew, a sociologist at the University of Auckland, argues that our exceedingly interconnected world of social media is just as conducive for social panics as secluded mediaeval convents once were.
4) Indeed, the historical record dates back to mediaeval Europe – including one notorious case in which nuns were reported to be meowing in unison like cats.
5) The phenomenon known as ‘mass psychogenic illness’ (MPI) – in which a group of people starts feeling sick with similar symptoms in the absence of a clear physical reason – is nothing new. - Arrange the following into a meaningful sequence1) A molecule is a stable collection of nuclei and electrons.2) On the other hand, each nucleus is a combined system composed of several protons and a roughly equal number of neutrons.3) Electrons are elementary particles with no internal structure and a negative electric charge.4) If the collection contains a single nucleus, it is called an atom
- Arrange the following into a meaningful sequence:
1). I’m not sure when I first became aware of the Singularity.
2). In the almost half century that I've immersed myself in computer and related technologies, I've sought to understand the meaning and purpose of the continual upheaval that I have witnessed at many levels.
3). Gradually, I've become aware of a transforming event looming in the first half of the twenty first century.
4). I'd have to say it was a progressive awakening.
5). Just as a black hole in space dramatically alters the patterns of matter and energy accelerating toward its event horizon, this impending Singularity in our future is increasingly transforming every institution and aspect of human life, from sexuality to spirituality - Arrange the following into a meaningful sequence:
1). Our knowledge about life developed over the centuries thanks to the many philosophers, physicists, chemists and biologists, who examined such complex matters according to their different points of view.
2). Out of this long history, I wish to quote here only one date, the year 1953
3). In that year, Miller and Urey carried out their famous experiment about the primordial universal soup, whose foundations had already been expounded by the Russian chemist Alexandre Oparin in 1924
4). From a mixture of five gases, methane, ammonia, carbon dioxide, hydrogen and water vapor, and an electric discharge as the source of energy, complex molecules were produced, including amino acids. - Arrange the following sentences in a LOGICAL sequence:
1. In America, primary-age pupils are on average five months behind where they would usually be in maths, and four months in reading, according to McKinsey, a consultancy.
2. As a new school year gets under way in many countries, the harm caused by months of closure is becoming ever clearer.
3. The crisis will accelerate that trend.
4. The damage is almost certainly worse in places such as India and Mexico, where the disruption to schooling has been greater.
5. Even before pandemic, parents around the world were growing more willing to pay for extra lessons in the hope of boosting their children’s education.
View More Questions
Top XAT Questions
- Ashok, a maths teacher in the school, asked his students to guess his date of birth by giving the following hints.
Hint 1: He was born in 1995
Hint 2: The sum of the products of his birth date multiplied by 24 and his birthday month multiplied by 60 is 1284.
Find the sum of Ashok’s birth date, birth month, and birth year. - Solve for the number of integral values of \(x: \frac{(x^2-15x+47)(x-13)}{(x-8)}<0\).
- In an examination, Akhil scored 11.11% less than the pass marks and Akshay scored 12.5% more than the pass marks. Find the percentage of pass marks if the sum of the scores of Akhil and Akshay is 25% more than the total marks.
- The ratio of paint and oil in Tank A is 3: 4, whereas in Tank B, the respective ratio is 4: 5 . Then, 96 liters of a mixture consisting of paint and oil in the ratio of 5: 1 is added to Tank A, such that the respective ratio in Tank A becomes exactly the reverse of that in Tank B. Find the amount (in liters) of the mixture from Tank B that is poured into Tank A such that the amount of paint and water in Tank A become equal.
- The points (–4, 3) and (–1, –4) are two end points of a diagonal of a parallelogram. If the other diagonal has the equation 7y + 3x + c = 0, then find the value of c.
View More Questions