Question:

Consider the Pauli matrices \(\sigma_x = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\), \(\sigma_y = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix}\), \(\sigma_z = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}\).
The value of \(\text{Tr}\big(\sigma_z [\sigma_x, \sigma_y]\big)\) is

Show Hint

Multiply out \(\sigma_x\sigma_y\) and \(\sigma_y\sigma_x\) as \(2\times2\) matrices first, then subtract to get the commutator before multiplying by \(\sigma_z\).
Updated On: Jul 28, 2026
  • \(2i\)
  • \(i\)
  • \(4i\)
  • \(\dfrac{i}{2}\)
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Multiply \(\sigma_x\sigma_y\).
\[ \sigma_x \sigma_y = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} i & 0 \\ 0 & -i \end{pmatrix} \]
Each entry comes from the usual row times column rule: top-left is \(0\cdot 0 + 1\cdot i = i\), top-right is \(0\cdot(-i) + 1\cdot 0 = 0\), and so on for the rest.

Step 2: Multiply \(\sigma_y\sigma_x\).
\[ \sigma_y \sigma_x = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} -i & 0 \\ 0 & i \end{pmatrix} \]

Step 3: Form the commutator \([\sigma_x, \sigma_y] = \sigma_x\sigma_y - \sigma_y\sigma_x\).
\[ [\sigma_x, \sigma_y] = \begin{pmatrix} i & 0 \\ 0 & -i \end{pmatrix} - \begin{pmatrix} -i & 0 \\ 0 & i \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 2i & 0 \\ 0 & -2i \end{pmatrix} = 2i\,\sigma_z \]

Step 4: Multiply by \(\sigma_z\) and take the trace.
\[ \sigma_z [\sigma_x,\sigma_y] = \sigma_z (2i\sigma_z) = 2i\,\sigma_z^2 \]
Since \(\sigma_z^2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} = I\), we get \(\sigma_z[\sigma_x,\sigma_y] = 2iI\). The trace of \(2iI\) is \(2i\) times the trace of the \(2\times2\) identity, which is \(2i \times 2 = 4i\).

Step 5: Why the other options are wrong.
Option (A), \(2i\), is only the coefficient in \([\sigma_x,\sigma_y]=2i\sigma_z\) before taking the trace with \(\sigma_z\); it skips the last multiplication and trace step. Options (B) and (D) do not match this direct computation at all and would only appear from an arithmetic slip in the matrix multiplication.

Final Answer:
\(\text{Tr}(\sigma_z[\sigma_x,\sigma_y]) = 4i\), which is option (C).\[ \boxed{4i} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top GATE PH Physics Questions

View More Questions

Top GATE PH Quantum Mechanics Questions

View More Questions

Top GATE PH Questions

View More Questions