Compare the C–O bond length in the following compounds (a) \(CH_3{-}CO{-}CH_3\) (b) Benzaldehyde type structure (c) \(CH_3{-}COO^{-}\) Compare C–O bond length.
Concept: Bond length depends on bond order.
• Higher bond order → shorter bond length
• Lower bond order → longer bond length
Resonance can reduce bond order and increase bond length.
[width=0.5]18c ans.png
Step 1: Compound (a)
\[ CH_3{-}CO{-}CH_3 \]
This contains a normal carbonyl bond \(C=O\).
Bond order \(=2\). Hence bond length is relatively shorter.
Step 2: Compound (c)
\[ CH_3{-}COO^- \]
Carboxylate ion has resonance between two oxygen atoms.
\[ R{-}C=O \leftrightarrow R{-}C{-}O^- \]
Thus both C–O bonds become equivalent with bond order \(1.5\).
Hence bond length is intermediate.
Step 3: Compound (b)
In this structure, resonance with the benzene ring gives a quasi-aromatic resonance form.
\[ \text{Resonance structures (RS1 and RS2)} \]
This delocalization decreases the effective bond order of the C–O bond.
Therefore C–O bond length becomes maximum.
Step 4: Final order
\[ b > c > a \]
Thus,
\[ \boxed{\text{Option (2) is correct}} \]