Comprehension
Asia is at the front line of climate change. Extreme heat in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, wildfires in Australia, typhoons in Japan, are real and present dangers and likely to become more frequent as climate change intensifies. McKinsey’s report on ‘Climate risk and response in Asia’, finds that, without adaptation and mitigation, Asia is expected to experience more severe socioeconomic impacts of climate change than other parts of the world. Large cities in the Indian Subcontinent could be among the first places in the world to experience heat waves that exceed the survivability threshold. Just as information systems and cybersecurity have become integrated into corporate and public-sector decision making, climate change will also need to feature as a major factor in decisions. Climate science tells us that some amount of warming over the next decade is already locked in due to past emissions, and temperatures will continue to rise. India anticipates a significant infrastructure build out over the next decades with projects worth $1.77 trillion across 34 sub sectors, according to the National Infrastructure Pipeline. Robust regulations around outdoor work could significantly reduce the economic risk of lost hours as well as the toll on life from heat waves. The good news is that we have started to see some Indian states and cities pursuing such policies. Ahmedabad City Corporation introduced a heat action plan- the first of its kind in India in response to the 2010 heat wave that killed 300 people in a single day. The city now has a heat-wave early warning system, a citywide programme of roof reflectivity to keep buildings cool, and teams to distribute cool water and rehydration tablets during heat waves. Renewable energy has grown rapidly in India and can contribute 30 per cent of gross electricity generation by 2030, according to the Central Electricity Authority.
Question: 1

Which of the following cannot be inferred from the above passage?

Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
  • It is imperative to lessen our vulnerability to harmful effects of climate change.
  • Increase in mitigation strategies will eventually lead to an increase in pollutants
  • Reduction of emissions which are heat-trapping and harmful for environment should be our primary goal.
  • The infrastructure development plans need to be climate friendly
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Approach Solution - 1

The correct Answer is (B):Increase in mitigation strategies will eventually lead to an increase in pollutants
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

The passage explains that Asia faces severe climate risks and argues for adaptation and mitigation, including reduced emissions, heat action plans, and renewable energy. A "cannot be inferred" question asks for the one option that goes against or has no support in this argument.

  1. It is imperative to lessen our vulnerability to harmful effects of climate change: The passage's entire discussion of heat waves, the survivability threshold, and Ahmedabad's heat action plan supports the idea that India needs to reduce its exposure to climate harm, so this follows directly.
  2. Increase in mitigation strategies will eventually lead to an increase in pollutants: Mitigation, in the sense the passage uses it, means cutting emissions and building renewable capacity, both of which lower pollutants over time. Saying that more mitigation leads to more pollutants reverses the passage's own logic and finds no support in the text.
  3. Reduction of emissions which are heat-trapping and harmful for environment should be our primary goal: This lines up with the passage's emphasis on emission reduction, decarbonising industry, and moving toward renewable energy, so it can be inferred.
  4. The infrastructure development plans need to be climate friendly: The passage links the $1.77 trillion National Infrastructure Pipeline directly to the need for climate-conscious planning, so this also follows from the text.

Three of the four options restate positions the passage supports; only the claim that more mitigation increases pollutants contradicts what mitigation is described as doing.

So the correct answer is increase in mitigation strategies will eventually lead to an increase in pollutants.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Consider the following statements:
I. The impact of increasing heat is more on the ones who are economically poor and engaged in outdoor employment. 
II. Risk to environment is directly related to change in climate. 
III. A localised understanding of climate risk is essential to mitigate the risk. As per the above passage, which of these statements is implicit?

Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
  • I only.
  • I and II.
  • I, II and III.
  • I and III.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Approach Solution - 1

The correct Answer is (C):I, II and III.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

This question tests which of three statements is implicit in the passage, meaning each statement must be checked separately for textual support before combining them into an option.

  1. I only: Statement I holds since the passage links regulations on outdoor work to reducing both economic loss and loss of life from heat waves, work that is often done by economically weaker groups exposed directly to extreme heat. But choosing "I only" would wrongly exclude II and III, which also hold up.
  2. I and II: Statement II is a safe implication too, since the passage's whole argument rests on environmental risk rising as the climate changes. This option is closer but still leaves out III.
  3. I, II and III: Statement III is supported by the passage's own example of Ahmedabad building a city-specific heat action plan after its 2010 heat wave, an early warning system, roof reflectivity, and water distribution tailored to that city, showing that climate risk needs a localised response. With I and II also standing, all three are implicit together.
  4. I and III: This combination drops statement II, which is directly supported by the passage's central claim connecting climate change to rising environmental risk, so this option is incomplete.

Since each of the three statements finds separate support in the passage, the option that keeps all three together is the accurate one.

So the correct answer is I, II and III.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Which of the following strategies is not appropriate to reduce the climate change risk?

Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
  • Decreasing energy efficiency.
  • Carbon Pricing System.
  • Decarbonising industrial operations and buildings
  • Investments in adaptive technologies.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Approach Solution - 1

The correct Answer is (A):Decreasing energy efficiency.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

The passage lists several strategies Asia and India can use to lower climate risk, so this question asks which listed option actually works against that goal instead of supporting it.

  1. Decreasing energy efficiency: Lower energy efficiency means more energy, and usually more emissions, are needed to do the same amount of work. That runs directly against reducing climate risk rather than helping it.
  2. Carbon Pricing System: Putting a price on carbon is a standard tool for cutting emissions by making polluting activity more costly, which fits the passage's broader push toward lower emissions.
  3. Decarbonising industrial operations and buildings: Cutting carbon from industry and buildings targets emissions at their source and matches the passage's emphasis on reducing heat-trapping gases.
  4. Investments in adaptive technologies: The passage frames adaptation, alongside mitigation, as central to managing Asia's climate risk, so investing in technologies that help adaptation is squarely appropriate.

Three of the four options describe genuine risk-reducing measures. Only decreasing energy efficiency pulls in the opposite direction, since it raises rather than lowers the energy and emissions burden.

So the correct answer is decreasing energy efficiency.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

As per the above passage, which of the following is a major challenge to control the climate change?

Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
  • Reliance on non-renewable energy is significant for economic growth.
  • Renewable energy is now utilised in many sectors to curb the increasing risk of climate change.
  • Remedial actions for climate change are encouraged to lessen the risk of global warming.
  • Regulated industrialisation keeps a balance between growth and environment.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Approach Solution - 1

The correct Answer is (A): Reliance on non-renewable energy is significant for economic growth.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

The question wants an option describing an obstacle to controlling climate change, not a measure that helps control it, so each option needs to be checked for whether it works for or against that control.

  1. Reliance on non-renewable energy is significant for economic growth: If growth still depends heavily on non-renewable energy, cutting emissions becomes harder because economies resist giving up that energy source. This describes a genuine barrier to controlling climate change.
  2. Renewable energy is now utilised in many sectors to curb the increasing risk of climate change: This describes renewable energy actively helping to manage the risk, which is a positive development, not a challenge.
  3. Remedial actions for climate change are encouraged to lessen the risk of global warming: Encouraging remedial action is again a helpful step forward, the opposite of an obstacle.
  4. Regulated industrialisation keeps a balance between growth and environment: Balanced, regulated industrial growth is presented as a solution that manages both growth and environmental impact, not a difficulty.

Only the option about continued reliance on non-renewable energy for growth describes something that makes controlling climate change harder.

So the correct answer is reliance on non-renewable energy is significant for economic growth.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

Consider the following statement- “Just as information systems and cybersecurity have become integrated into corporate and public-sector decision making, climate change will also need to feature as a major factor in decisions.” Which of the following is the most appropriate explanation for the above statement?

Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
  • Decision making by organisations should not depend on the climate conditions which may lead to hampering their growth.
  • Monetary investments in adoption of climate friendly tools is not an urgent need.
  • The understanding of climate risk should not be integrated into decision making.
  • Organisations must incorporate climate risk, build the necessary infrastructural capabilities and tools to diagnose risks.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Approach Solution - 1

The correct Answer is (D):Organisations must incorporate climate risk, build the necessary infrastructural capabilities and tools to diagnose risks.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

The quoted line compares climate change to cybersecurity as a factor that organisations must now build into their decision making, so the correct option should reflect that organisations need to actively plan for climate risk, not avoid or delay it.

  1. Decision making by organisations should not depend on the climate conditions which may lead to hampering their growth: This says the opposite of the quoted line, which explicitly asks organisations to factor climate change into decisions, growth concerns included.
  2. Monetary investments in adoption of climate friendly tools is not an urgent need: Treating climate investment as non-urgent contradicts a statement that puts climate change on the same footing as cybersecurity, which every organisation already treats as urgent.
  3. The understanding of climate risk should not be integrated into decision making: This directly reverses the quoted sentence, which calls for exactly that integration.
  4. Organisations must incorporate climate risk, build the necessary infrastructural capabilities and tools to diagnose risks: This restates the comparison faithfully: just as firms built cybersecurity capability into decisions, they now need equivalent capability and tools for climate risk.

The first three options all contradict or weaken the quoted comparison, while the fourth carries it forward accurately.

So the correct answer is organisations must incorporate climate risk, build the necessary infrastructural capabilities and tools to diagnose risks.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top CLAT Questions

View More Questions