The passage explains that Asia faces severe climate risks and argues for adaptation and mitigation, including reduced emissions, heat action plans, and renewable energy. A "cannot be inferred" question asks for the one option that goes against or has no support in this argument.
Three of the four options restate positions the passage supports; only the claim that more mitigation increases pollutants contradicts what mitigation is described as doing.
So the correct answer is increase in mitigation strategies will eventually lead to an increase in pollutants.
This question tests which of three statements is implicit in the passage, meaning each statement must be checked separately for textual support before combining them into an option.
Since each of the three statements finds separate support in the passage, the option that keeps all three together is the accurate one.
So the correct answer is I, II and III.
The passage lists several strategies Asia and India can use to lower climate risk, so this question asks which listed option actually works against that goal instead of supporting it.
Three of the four options describe genuine risk-reducing measures. Only decreasing energy efficiency pulls in the opposite direction, since it raises rather than lowers the energy and emissions burden.
So the correct answer is decreasing energy efficiency.
The question wants an option describing an obstacle to controlling climate change, not a measure that helps control it, so each option needs to be checked for whether it works for or against that control.
Only the option about continued reliance on non-renewable energy for growth describes something that makes controlling climate change harder.
So the correct answer is reliance on non-renewable energy is significant for economic growth.
The quoted line compares climate change to cybersecurity as a factor that organisations must now build into their decision making, so the correct option should reflect that organisations need to actively plan for climate risk, not avoid or delay it.
The first three options all contradict or weaken the quoted comparison, while the fourth carries it forward accurately.
So the correct answer is organisations must incorporate climate risk, build the necessary infrastructural capabilities and tools to diagnose risks.