Comprehension

As the post–World War II generation of liberal democratic leaders forged new, highly successful domestic and international institutions and policies throughout the West, the weaknesses of liberal democracy that dominated the two decades after World War II faded from view. But they did not go away.
First, because liberal democracy restrains majorities, it slows the achievement of goals that majorities support. This generates frustration with institutional restraints, and an unacknowledged envy of authoritarian systems that can act quickly and decisively. China can build huge cities in the time it takes the United States to review the environmental impact of small highway projects. Liberal democracy requires more patience than many possess. Second, liberal democracy requires tolerance for minority views and ways of life to which many citizens are deeply opposed. It is natural to feel that if we consider certain views or ways of life to be odious, we should use public power to suppress them. In many such cases, liberal democracy restrains this impulse, a psychological burden that some will find unbearable. 
This leads directly to the third inherent problem of liberal democracy—the distinction it requires us to make between civic identity and personal or group identity. For example, although we may consider certain religious views false and even dangerous, we must, for civic purposes, accept those who hold these views as our equals. They may freely express these views; they may organize to promote them; they may vote, and their votes are given the same weight as ours. The same goes for race, ethnicity, gender, and all the particularities that distinguish us from one another. 
This requirement often goes against the grain of natural sentiments. We want the public sphere to reflect what we find most valuable about our private commitments. Liberal democracy prevents us from fully translating our personal identities into our public lives as citizens. This too is not always easy to bear. The quest for wholeness—for a political community, or even a world, that reflects our most important commitments—is a deep yearning to which liberal leaders can always appeal.
Nor is the fourth inherent difficulty of liberal democracy—the necessity of compromise—easy to bear. If what I want is good and true, why should I agree that public decisions must incorporate competing views? James Madison gives us the answer: in circumstances of liberty, diversity of views is inevitable, and unless those who agree with us form a majority so large as to be irresistible, the alternative to compromise is inaction, which is often more damaging, or oppression, which always is.

Question: 1

According to the passage, which of the following BEST explains why liberal democracy needs patience?

Show Hint

In reading comprehension, focus on the main arguments and key reasons provided in the passage. Here, the need for patience in liberal democracy is linked to the importance of respecting minority views, even when they contradict the majority.
Updated On: Jan 7, 2026
  • Because liberal democracy believes that minority views matter more than majority views.
  • Because liberal democracy believes environmental impact is more important than human progress.
  • Because liberal democracy has to ensure that all views are considered before taking a decision.
  • Because liberal democracy requires the authorities to restrain majorities from acting unilaterally.
  • Because liberal democracy ensures that public opinions will be heard.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the passage.
The passage discusses the inherent difficulties of liberal democracy, such as the need for patience because it requires the balancing of majority and minority views. The author explains that liberal democracy requires restraint, particularly when it comes to respecting minority views, even when they conflict with the majority.
Step 2: Evaluating the options.
- (A) Because liberal democracy believes that minority views matter more than majority views: This is the correct answer, as the passage emphasizes the importance of liberal democracy in respecting minority views, even when they conflict with the majority.
- (B) Because liberal democracy believes environmental impact is more important than human progress: This is not discussed in the passage. The passage does not focus on environmental impact but rather on the balance between majority and minority views.
- (C) Because liberal democracy has to ensure that all views are considered before taking a decision: This is somewhat implied, but the passage places more emphasis on the difficulty of tolerating minority views rather than the need for all views to be considered.
- (D) Because liberal democracy requires the authorities to restrain majorities from acting unilaterally: This is a valid point in the passage, but it does not fully explain the need for patience as effectively as option (A).
- (E) Because liberal democracy ensures that public opinions will be heard: This is not the primary reason for the need for patience in liberal democracy, as the passage focuses more on the balance of views and the challenges it presents.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A) because the passage emphasizes that liberal democracy requires patience in part because it places significant value on minority views.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

According to the passage, how does the second problem of liberal democracy lead to the third problem?

Show Hint

When reading comprehension questions, focus on the relationships between different concepts discussed in the passage. In this case, understanding how one problem leads to another is key.
Updated On: Jan 7, 2026
  • While some find certain views personally distasteful, they will permit those views to exist in the public sphere.
  • We tolerate unpopular views since the view holder has a right to express and follow them.
  • By tolerating the views we disagree with, we suffer from multiple identities.
  • While we tolerate views that we disagree with, we have to demonstrate that we tolerate them by allowing them to coexist among us.
  • The more we find some views unacceptable, the more liberal democracy forces us to accept it in a public space.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the passage.
The passage discusses how the second problem of liberal democracy (tolerating views that we disagree with) leads to the third problem, which is the need to demonstrate our tolerance by allowing such views to coexist in the public sphere. This creates a conflict between personal beliefs and the need for tolerance in a democratic society.
Step 2: Evaluating the options.
- (A) While some find certain views personally distasteful, they will permit those views to exist in the public sphere: This is a valid point but does not fully explain how the second problem leads to the third.
- (B) We tolerate unpopular views since the view holder has a right to express and follow them: While this is true, it does not address the link between the second and third problems as described in the passage.
- (C) By tolerating the views we disagree with, we suffer from multiple identities: This is not discussed in the passage. The focus is on the need to demonstrate tolerance.
- (D) While we tolerate views that we disagree with, we have to demonstrate that we tolerate them by allowing them to coexist among us: This is the correct answer as it best explains how the second problem (tolerating views) leads to the third problem (demonstrating tolerance).
- (E) The more we find some views unacceptable, the more liberal democracy forces us to accept it in a public space: This is related but does not fully explain the transition from the second to the third problem.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (D) because it most accurately describes how the second problem of liberal democracy leads to the third problem.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

According to the passage, which of the following reasons BEST explains why “necessity of compromise” is a difficulty for liberal democracy?

Show Hint

In reading comprehension, focus on identifying the primary challenges or difficulties described in the passage. Here, the main difficulty is the tension between protecting individual rights and the need for compromise.
Updated On: Jan 7, 2026
  • Since our core beliefs define who we are, we want to see that reflected in public space.
  • We do not like compromising on anything we badly want.
  • Since liberal democracy is supposed to protect our rights, compromising on them seems incompatible with liberty.
  • While we believe our views are correct, to accept that others' views deserve merit is not always easy.
  • Liberal democracy makes us endure divergent behaviours in public sphere.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the passage.
The passage discusses the challenges of liberal democracy, particularly the difficulty of compromise. It explains that in a liberal democracy, citizens may find it hard to compromise on their rights, as doing so can seem incompatible with the very concept of liberty.
Step 2: Evaluating the options.
- (A) Since our core beliefs define who we are, we want to see that reflected in public space: While this is true, it focuses more on personal beliefs rather than the difficulty of compromising within the framework of liberal democracy.
- (B) We do not like compromising on anything we badly want: This is true in general, but the passage focuses more on the conflict between compromise and liberty.
- (C) Since liberal democracy is supposed to protect our rights, compromising on them seems incompatible with liberty: This is the correct answer, as it directly addresses the central difficulty discussed in the passage: the tension between protecting rights and the necessity of compromise.
- (D) While we believe our views are correct, to accept that others' views deserve merit is not always easy: This is a valid point but does not fully address the issue of compromise in liberal democracy.
- (E) Liberal democracy makes us endure divergent behaviours in public sphere: While this is mentioned in the passage, it is not the primary reason for the difficulty of compromise.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (C) because it best explains the difficulty of compromise in liberal democracy as described in the passage.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in XAT exam

View More Questions