Step 1: Find the sentence that opens the passage.
An opening sentence should introduce the three terms fresh, without a pronoun or connector reaching back to an earlier line. Sentence 1 does this: it names "universality, particularity, and individuality" for the first time and states the key claim that, in the concept, these three are "immediately identical to each other." Sentences 2, 3, and 4 all lean on ideas already introduced (Sentence 2 uses "these," Sentence 3 uses "this means," and Sentence 4 uses "otherwise," which needs a prior case for contrast), so none of them can open the passage.
Step 2: Attach sentence 2 to sentence 1.
Sentence 2 begins "As immediately identical, these 'moments of the concept' cannot be separated." The phrase "immediately identical" and "these moments" repeat the exact idea and words from sentence 1, so sentence 2 is a direct continuation of sentence 1, restating it as a consequence: because they are identical, they cannot be separated.
Step 3: Attach sentence 3 to sentence 2, then close with sentence 4.
Sentence 3 opens with "This means," pointing back to the claim just made in sentence 2, that the moments cannot be separated, and unpacking it further: they must be seen as one single unity, with none of the three understandable apart from the others. This is a natural elaboration of sentence 2, so it comes right after it. Sentence 4 then closes the passage with "otherwise," drawing a contrast: after describing how the three terms behave "in the concept" (sentences 1 to 3), sentence 4 notes that their interrelation is different "in judgment." A contrast line naturally comes last, once the first case has been fully laid out.
Final Answer:
The logical order is 1, 2, 3, 4.
\[ \boxed{1,\ 2,\ 3,\ 4} \]