Comprehension

Analyse the following passage and provide appropriate answers for the questions that follow:
Advances in economic theory in the 1970s and 1980s illuminated the limits of markets; they showed that unfettered markets do not lead to economic e ciency whenever information is imperfect or markets are missing (for instance, good insurance markets to cover the key risks confronting individuals). And information is always imperfect and markets are always incomplete. Nor do markets, by themselves, necessarily lead to economic e ciency when the task of a country is to absorb new technology, to close the “knowledge gap”: a central feature of development. Today, most academic economists agree that markets, by themselves, do not lead to e ciency; the question is whether government can improve matters.
While it is di cult for economics to perform experiments to test their theories, as a chemist or a physicist might, the world provides a vast array of natural experiments as dozens of countries try different strategies. Unfortunately, because each country differs in its history and circumstances and in the myriad of details in the policies - and details do matter - it is often di cult to get a clear interpretation. What is clear, however, is that there have been marked differences in performance, that the most successful countries have been those in Asia, and that in most of the Asian countries, government played a very active role. As we look more carefully at the effects of particular policies, these conclusions are reinforced: there is a remarkable congruence between what economic theory says government should do and what the East Asian governments actually did. By the same token, the economic theories based on imperfect information and incomplete risk markets that predicted that the free ow of short-term capital - a key feature of market fundamentalist policies - would produce not growth but instability have also been borne out 

Question: 1

“… whether government can improve matters”. Here ‘matters’ indicates

Show Hint

In economics passages, the word “matters” often signifies the larger concern of \textbf{overall efficiency or welfare}. Don’t confuse it with narrower causes like imperfect markets or information gaps. Always look for the broader meaning in such contexts.
Updated On: Aug 25, 2025
  • Economic efficiency
  • Information imperfectness
  • Knowledge gaps
  • Good insurance markets
  • Incomplete risk markets
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the context.
The phrase in the passage is “…whether government can improve matters.” The word “matters” here does not refer to trivial issues or physical objects. Instead, in an economic and governance context, “matters” refers to the state of efficiency, functioning, or effectiveness of the economy.
Step 2: Evaluating each option.
- (A) Economic efficiency: This makes sense. Governments intervene to correct market failures, reduce inefficiencies, and improve overall welfare. Thus, “improve matters” means making the economy more efficient. Correct.
- (B) Information imperfectness: This is one cause of inefficiency but not directly what “matters” refers to. It is too specific. Incorrect.
- (C) Knowledge gaps: This refers to lack of awareness, not directly linked to the meaning of “matters” here. Incorrect.
- (D) Good insurance markets: This is only one particular economic institution, not the broad meaning of “matters.” Incorrect.
- (E) Incomplete risk markets: Again, this is a specific cause of inefficiency, not the general condition meant by “matters.” Incorrect.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The word “matters” in this economic context refers broadly to the issue of economic efficiency, which the government is expected to improve.
\[ \boxed{\text{Correct Answer: (A) Economic efficiency}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following options CANNOT be inferred from the above passage?

Show Hint

In inference questions, be wary of \textbf{absolute terms} like “always,” “never,” or “cannot.” These are rarely supported by nuanced passages and are often the incorrect choice.
Updated On: Aug 25, 2025
  • Free flow of short-term capital might fail to ensure economic growth.
  • Insurance market is a proof that ‘markets, by themselves, do not lead to efficiency’.
  • It is difficult to interpret the success of economic policies of Asian countries.
  • Technology can impede market efficiency.
  • State intervention and imperfect information can never go hand-in-hand.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Recall the theme of the passage.
The passage discusses limitations of free markets, possible inefficiencies caused by information gaps, issues with technology, and complexities in interpreting policies. It emphasizes that markets do not always ensure efficiency and that multiple factors can influence outcomes.
Step 2: Check each option.
- (A) The idea that free flow of capital may not guarantee growth is consistent with economic criticisms and can be inferred.
- (B) The insurance market is indeed a common example of market inefficiency due to imperfect information (adverse selection, moral hazard). This can be inferred.
- (C) The complexity of evaluating Asian economic policies is plausible and aligns with the passage. This can be inferred.
- (D) The passage mentions that technology can sometimes impede market efficiency (e.g., through disruption, monopoly power, or uneven access). This too can be inferred.
- (E) The claim that “State intervention and imperfect information can never go hand-in-hand” is an absolute statement. The passage does not support this extreme claim. In fact, state intervention is often meant to correct imperfect information. Thus, this statement cannot be inferred.
Step 3: Conclude.
Since (E) is an extreme, unsupported statement that contradicts the logic of the passage, it is the correct answer.
\[ \boxed{\text{Correct Answer: (E)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Which of the following statements BEST captures the ESSENCE of the two paragraphs in the above passage?

Show Hint

When asked about the “essence” of paragraphs, look for the \textbf{logical progression}: general principle in one paragraph, applied or extended reasoning in the next. Avoid options that treat them as unrelated.
Updated On: Aug 25, 2025
  • Paragraph I and paragraph II are parallel arguments that are unrelated.
  • Paragraph I describes markets in general whereas Paragraph II describes market failures in Asian economics in particular.
  • Paragraph I explains why markets fail. Paragraph II spells out why market based economic theories fail to explain success of Asian economics.
  • Paragraph I raises question and paragraph II answers it.
  • Paragraph I states an economic theory and Paragraph II cites a natural experiment to disprove it.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understand the role of Paragraph I.
Paragraph I deals with market failures, laying out the reasons why markets often fail to achieve desired efficiency or outcomes. It focuses on the general theoretical weaknesses of markets.
Step 2: Understand the role of Paragraph II.
Paragraph II applies this reasoning to the specific case of Asian economies. It shows that despite the theoretical assumptions of markets, Asian economies succeeded in ways that market-based theories could not fully explain. Thus, it extends the critique by connecting it to real-world evidence.
Step 3: Match with the options.
(A) Wrong — They are not unrelated; they are connected, with Para II extending Para I.
(B) Wrong — Para I is not just describing “markets in general”; it is analyzing failures.
(C) Correct — Para I = why markets fail; Para II = why market-based economic theories fail to explain Asian economic success. Perfect alignment.
(D) Partially correct — It is not simply a Q–A structure, but rather a logical flow from general failure explanation to application.
(E) Wrong — There is no explicit mention of a natural experiment; the focus is on theory vs. real-world economics.
Step 4: Conclude.
The best option that captures the essence is (C).
\[ \boxed{\text{Correct Answer: (C)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in XAT exam

View More Questions