Comprehension
An unintended and unjust consequence of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 is its widespread persecution of teenage lovers. This law raised the age of consent from 16 to 18 years, while defining persons below 18 years as children. Consequently, when two 16-year-olds are romantically and sexually involved, but the girl's family doesn't approve the affair and files a police complaint, her consent has zero legal validity. And the consensual relationship morphs into a case of statutory rape. The Allahabad High Court has indicated how its "conscience" is concerned by such severe POCSO provisions being drawn by teenage lovers simply on the basis of family disapproval. The High Courts of Delhi, Madras and others have made similar observations in recent years and also pointed to amendments to the law that can help reduce its injustices. One suggestion that has gathered broad support is to push back both the cut-off for childhood and the age of consent to 16 years. Given that the NCRB data shows around half of POCSO cases falling in the 16-18 years age group, such an amendment is overdue. Minimizing the prosecution of consensual romances would also leave a logjammed system with more space to pursue actual sexual assault cases. The broader goal here is respecting the rights of adolescents and young adults. Their romantic and sexual autonomy needs greatly increased recognition in India.
Question: 1
"Minimising the prosecution of consensual romances would also leave a logjammed system with more space to pursue actual sexual assault cases."
In the context of the statement, which of the following strengthens the author's opinion?
"Minimising the prosecution of consensual romances would also leave a logjammed system with more space to pursue actual sexual assault cases."
In the context of the statement, which of the following strengthens the author's opinion?
In the context of the statement, which of the following strengthens the author's opinion?
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- There are many unreported sexual assault cases.
- Speedy prosecution of sexual assault cases is desirable.
- Consensual romance, in some cases, can amount to sexual assault.
- Sexual assault and rape are different.
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Approach Solution - 1
The correct option is (B): Speedy prosecution of sexual assault cases is desirable.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The quoted line argues that freeing the justice system from prosecuting consensual teenage romance cases would give it more room to handle genuine sexual assault cases. The question asks which option best strengthens this argument. Let's test each one.
- There are many unreported sexual assault cases: This points to a different problem, cases that never enter the system at all, under-reporting. It does not speak to what happens to the caseload once assault cases are reported and enter the system, so it does not directly strengthen the specific claim about freeing up capacity within the system.
- Speedy prosecution of sexual assault cases is desirable: If timely prosecution of real assault cases is something worth pursuing, then any measure, such as removing consensual-romance cases from the docket, that gives the system more bandwidth to prosecute assault cases faster becomes valuable. This directly supports the reasoning that freeing up space in the system has real, desirable payoff.
- Consensual romance, in some cases, can amount to sexual assault: This actually cuts against the argument. If consensual romance could itself sometimes be sexual assault, then removing such cases from prosecution becomes risky rather than a straightforward system-relief measure, weakening rather than strengthening the claim.
- Sexual assault and rape are different: This is a definitional distinction that has no bearing on whether decongesting the system by excluding consensual-romance cases helps the prosecution of genuine assault cases.
The option that most directly reinforces why creating more room in the system for assault cases matters is the one affirming that prosecuting those cases quickly is itself a desirable goal.
Therefore, the correct answer is Speedy prosecution of sexual assault cases is desirable.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
What has the author conveyed regarding the prosecution of statutory rape in India?
What has the author conveyed regarding the prosecution of statutory rape in India?
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Statutory rape does not violate the romantic and sexual autonomy of young adults.
- Statutory rape must be met with stricter punishment.
- Statutory rape must be abolished.
- Statutory rape is a relic of Victorian morality.
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Approach Solution - 1
The correct option is (A): Statutory rape does not violate the romantic and sexual autonomy of young adults.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks what the author's actual position is on the prosecution of statutory rape in India, based on how the argument is framed and what fix is proposed.
- Statutory rape does not violate the romantic and sexual autonomy of young adults: The argument is not against statutory rape prosecution as such, it is against consensual teenage romance being wrongly classified as statutory rape. The proposed fix is to recalibrate the age of consent and the childhood cut-off to 16, so that genuine statutory rape cases, involving real coercion or a meaningful age or power gap, remain properly prosecuted without capturing consensual peer relationships. Once that line is correctly drawn, prosecuting actual statutory rape does not infringe on the autonomy of young adults, it is only the overbroad sweep of the current law that does.
- Statutory rape must be met with stricter punishment: The thrust of the argument is toward narrowing and correcting the scope of the law, not toughening penalties. Nothing in the reasoning calls for harsher sentencing.
- Statutory rape must be abolished: The proposal is an amendment, adjusting the age thresholds, not scrapping the offence of statutory rape altogether. Abolition would remove protection for children who genuinely need it, which runs against the stated goal of still pursuing actual sexual assault cases.
- Statutory rape is a relic of Victorian morality: This is a much broader ideological claim about the law's origins that is never actually made, the argument is a targeted, practical one about age thresholds and misapplication, not a historical or moral critique of the offence itself.
The position, once the correction to age thresholds is made, is that statutory rape prosecution in its proper scope is not itself the problem for young adults' autonomy.
Therefore, the correct answer is Statutory rape does not violate the romantic and sexual autonomy of young adults.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
As per the above passage, which of the following does not correctly represent the author's view regarding the widespread persecution of teenage lovers under the POCSO Act?
As per the above passage, which of the following does not correctly represent the author's view regarding the widespread persecution of teenage lovers under the POCSO Act?
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Teenagers have the right to love as much as adults.
- Police complaints of teenage lovers may lead to their harassment.
- Consent of minor girls do not have legal validity.
- Consent of minor girls have legal validity.
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Approach Solution - 1
The correct option is (D): Consent of minor girls have legal validity.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
This question asks for the option that does NOT correctly represent the author's view on the persecution of teenage lovers under the POCSO Act. Since three options should align with the passage and one should contradict it, each is checked against what the passage actually says.
- Teenagers have the right to love as much as adults: The closing argument of the passage is that the romantic and sexual autonomy of adolescents and young adults needs far greater recognition in India, which is consistent with teenagers having a right to love that deserves respect. This correctly represents the author's view.
- Police complaints of teenage lovers may lead to their harassment: The passage describes exactly this scenario, a family disapproves of the relationship and files a complaint, turning a consensual romance into a statutory rape case. This is consistent with the author's account of harassment stemming from such complaints, so it correctly represents the view.
- Consent of minor girls do not have legal validity: The passage states plainly that in these cases, the girl's consent "has zero legal validity" under the current law. This matches the author's account directly, so it correctly represents the view.
- Consent of minor girls have legal validity: This is the direct opposite of what the passage states. The author explicitly says consent has zero legal validity under the current law, precisely the injustice the passage is arguing against. This option contradicts, rather than represents, the author's view.
Since the fourth option reverses what the passage actually says about the legal status of a minor's consent, it is the one that fails to represent the author's view correctly.
Therefore, the correct answer is Consent of minor girls have legal validity.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4
In the above passage, which of the following has concerned the "conscience" of the Allahabad High Court?
In the above passage, which of the following has concerned the "conscience" of the Allahabad High Court?
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Carelessness of teenage lovers.
- Threat to the safety of teenage lovers.
- Impact on mental health of teenage lovers.
- Harassment of teenage lovers by their families.
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Approach Solution - 1
The correct option is (D): Harassment of teenage lovers by their families.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks specifically what troubled the "conscience" of the Allahabad High Court, as described in the passage.
- Carelessness of teenage lovers: The passage never frames the teenagers themselves as careless or at fault, its concern is with how the law and family complaints are used against them, not with any failing on the teenagers' part.
- Threat to the safety of teenage lovers: The passage discusses legal persecution and prosecution, not physical danger or safety threats to the couple, so this does not match what troubled the court.
- Impact on mental health of teenage lovers: While being pulled into a criminal case would plausibly be distressing, the passage does not frame the court's concern in terms of mental health specifically, it frames it in terms of the legal process being weaponised.
- Harassment of teenage lovers by their families: The passage states directly that the court's conscience was concerned by severe POCSO provisions being invoked against teenage lovers "simply on the basis of family disapproval." That is, families turning to the law to punish a relationship they disapprove of, which is exactly a form of harassment through the legal system.
The court's stated concern, as the passage describes it, was about families weaponising the law against teenage couples purely out of disapproval.
Therefore, the correct answer is Harassment of teenage lovers by their families.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5
As per the above passage, which of the following is a major challenge in implementation of the POCSO Act?
As per the above passage, which of the following is a major challenge in implementation of the POCSO Act?
Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
- Speedy prosecution of cases.
- Respecting the rights of adolescents and young adults.
- Counselling of adolescents and young adults.
- Imposition of stringent punishment.
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Approach Solution - 1
The correct option is (C): Counselling of adolescents and young adults.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Approach Solution -2
The question asks for a major challenge in implementing the POCSO Act, based on the issues the passage raises around teenage lovers and family-driven complaints.
- Speedy prosecution of cases: The passage treats speedy prosecution of genuine assault cases as a goal worth achieving once the system is decongested, it is something the author wants enabled, not itself described as the obstacle standing in the way of proper implementation.
- Respecting the rights of adolescents and young adults: This is stated as the passage's broader goal, the outcome the author wants the law to move toward, rather than a specific operational challenge in how the Act is currently carried out.
- Counselling of adolescents and young adults: The underlying problem the passage describes is a social one as much as a legal one, families acting on disapproval rather than understanding, and cases arising because attitudes toward adolescent relationships have not caught up with the law's intent. Addressing that gap through counselling and awareness for adolescents and their families, so that disapproval does not automatically translate into criminal complaints, is a practical dimension of implementation that goes beyond simply amending the statute, and one that is not yet being addressed.
- Imposition of stringent punishment: The passage argues in the opposite direction, it wants the law's severe provisions applied more narrowly, not more stringently, so treating stricter punishment as a needed implementation challenge runs against the author's stated position.
Among the options, the one identifying a practical, on-the-ground gap in how the Act is carried out, rather than restating a legal goal or outcome, is the reference to counselling.
Therefore, the correct answer is Counselling of adolescents and young adults.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top CLAT Questions
- In the realm of contemporary literature, the interplay between character and setting is a nuanced dance that shapes the narrative’s essence. The setting, often described with painstaking detail, becomes more than a backdrop; it becomes a character, influencing the plot and character development.
Consider, for instance, the barren expanse of the desert in Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake. The arid landscape mirrors the sense of isolation felt by the protagonist, Gogol, as he navigates his identity crisis in a foreign land. The relentless sun and vast sands are not mere descriptions; they are the silent witnesses to his inner turmoil.
On the other end of the literary spectrum, there is Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. The lush, vibrant Kerala backwaters are not just the setting; they are a character woven into the fabric of the story. The teeming, humid landscape reflects the complex web of human relationships and secrets that unravel in the narrative. This interplay is not confined to contemporary literature alone. In Shakespeare’s timeless tragedy Macbeth, the eerie and foreboding setting of the Scottish moors casts a dark shadow over the characters’ actions. The moors, shrouded in mist and mystery, serve as an ever-present omen of the impending tragedy. - The crisis of justice that is the subject matter of discussion in the media today is in fact the crisis of “justice for the middle class”. The main difference between India and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries is that whereas the middle class in these countries has reasonable access to justice, in India it does not. A vocal and powerful middle class has emerged in India since 1991. It is demanding reasonable access to justice. Much of the judicial reform effort will help meet this demand…
The question of justice for the poor is, however, an altogether different challenge. No country in the world has been able to secure justice for the poor. Most of the jails of the richest countries are filled with the poorest. The “masses” are more often victims of the criminal justice system than of crime. In India as well, jails are almost exclusively filled with the poor. The civil justice system is hardly accessible to them. They are often victimised by lawyers, touts and court staff. They are docket-excluded, a new type of untouchability. The language and the logic—and the colonial and feudal culture—of the judicial system are alien to them. It rarely takes cognisance of their needs and interests.
Their main concern, therefore, is to escape the attention of the justice system, criminal and civil. A landless Dalit person in the interior of Madhya Pradesh once gave me an insightful definition of a court from the perspective of the masses: “A court is a place where you are forcibly taken by the police to be punished; no one goes to a court.” In contrast, many lawyers and judges colloquially define a court as “a temple of justice where rights are protected”.
These sharply divergent visions mean that justice for one section is often injustice for another. Protecting the livelihood of traditional taxi and auto drivers from predatory pricing by corporate app-based taxi providers by imaginatively using the available tools of law to delay their incursion would be seen by the rich and by sections of the middle class as a failure of the judicial system, and possibly as also resulting in a downgrading of the “ease of doing business” measure. However, the masses would see such a judicial intervention as strong evidence of a good justice system. Although the conflict over competing visions of the nation and conflicting demands from social and economic segments have confined judicial reform of judicial administration mainly to “neutral” areas such as process reform, procedural law, technology, planning and court and case management, judge strength, and the workload of judges, there has been considerable improvement in these areas, and the judicial system has improved its performance.
[Extracted, with edits, from “Justice and the Two Ideas of India”, by G. Mohan Gopal, Frontline] - Everything she wanted was here, at Carignano, in Kasauli. Here, on the ridge of the mountain, in this quiet house. It was the place, and the time of life, that she had wanted and prepared for all her life-as she realized on the first day at Carignano, with a great, cool flowering of relief - and at last she had it. She wanted no one and nothing else. Whatever else came, or happened here, would be an unwelcome intrusion and distraction. This she tried to convey to the plodding postman with a cold and piercing stare from the height of the ridge onto his honest bull back. Unfortunately, he did not look up at her on the hilltop but stared stolidly down at the dust piling onto his shoes as he plodded on. A bullock-man, an oafish ox, she thought bitterly. She stepped backwards into the garden and the wind suddenly billowed up and threw the pine branches about as though to curtain her. She was grey, tall and thin and her silk sari made a sweeping, shivering sound and she fancied she could merge with the pine trees and be mistaken for one. To be a tree, no more and no less, was all she was prepared to undertake.
What pleased and satisfied her so, here at Carignano, was its barrenness. This was the chief virtue of all Kasauli of course-its starkness. It had rocks, it had pines, it had light and air. In every direction there was a sweeping view - to the north, of the mountains, to the south, of the plains. Occasionally an eagle swam through this clear unobstructed mass of light and air, that was all. And Carignano, her home on the ridge, had no more than that. Why should it? The sun shone on its white walls. Its windows were open the ones facing north opened on to the blue waves of the Himalayas flowing out and up to the line of ice and snow sketched upon the sky, while those that faced south looked down the plunging cliff to the plain stretching out, flat and sere to the blurred horizon.
Yes, there were some apricot trees close to the house. There were clumps of iris that had finished blooming. There was the kitchen with a wing of smoke lifting out of its chimney and a stack of wood outside its door. But these were incidental, almost unimportant.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from “Fire on the Mountain” by Anita Desai] - English literature is a vast and diverse field that has left an indelible mark on the world of letters. From the eloquent plays of William Shakespeare to the complex novels of Jane Austen and the profound poetry of William Wordsworth, English literature offers a window into the human experience. One of the luminaries of English literature is William Shakespeare, often hailed as the greatest playwright in the history of English language. His works, including Hamlet, Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet, are celebrated for their exploration of human nature, love, ambition, and tragedy. His characters, such as the tormented Hamlet and the star-crossed lovers Romeo and Juliet, continue to captivate readers and audiences worldwide.
The 19th century ushered in a new era of literary giants. Jane Austen’s novels, such as Pride and Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility, provide incisive social commentary through the lens of wit and romance. Austen’s heroines, like Elizabeth Bennet and Elinor Dashwood, remain beloved literary figures known for their intelligence and resilience. The Romantic era brought forth poets like William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who celebrated * 8 UG the beauty of nature and the emotional intensity of the individual. Wordsworth’s ‘‘I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud’’ and Coleridge’s ‘‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’’ are testament to the power of the written words to evoke profound emotions and imagery. Moving towards 20th century, English literature continued to evolve. Virginia Woolf’s ground-breaking novel Mrs. Dalloway explored the inner thoughts and lives of its characters with a modernist narrative style. Dystopian visions, as seen in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four provided stark warnings about the dangers of totalitarianism and the erosion of individual freedom.
Today, English literature is a global phenomenon, transcending borders and languages. Indian authors like Arundhati Roy, with her novel The God of Small Things, have won prestigious international literary awards. The book not only explores intricate family dynamics but also delves into the broader socio-political landscape of India. In summary, English literature is a testament to the enduring power of storytelling and the written word. It encompasses an array of authors, themes, and styles that continue to captivate and inspire readers across the world. - On the evening of the 10th, General Dyer arrived at Amritsar, and the Deputy-Commissioner handed over the civil power to him. He issued a proclamation by word of mouth that no meetings should be held. Two days later, after there had been no sort of riot, nor murder, General Dyer heard that a meeting was to be held at the Jallianwala Bagh. He proceeded there with about fifty troops, half British, half Indian, and a certain number of Ghurkas, armed with their kukris. The Jallianwala Bagh is an open space, half a mile square, which has one entry wide enough for three persons. The troops got in and lined up on a mound of debris. The walls, seven feet high, and the surrounding houses enclosed the people. There were, too, three alleys through which the people might have been able to pass. Within thirty seconds of the troops getting in, General Dyer gave orders to fire, and the crowd of people, estimated at anything from 5,000 to 20,000, who were sitting on the ground peacefully listening to the mob oratory, were fired on. The result of the troops’ fire into the mass of people we do not know. But we do know that Dyer’s own estimate of the casualties resulting from ten minutes continual individual firing, was 400 to 500 killed and 1,500 wounded. The people were not able to escape. They were people who had not offered any violence and who had not been warned. These people were shot down. After ten minutes, the ammunition was exhausted and the troops marched off, and they left 1,500 wounded there. There were men lying there for two days, dying of thirst, eating the ground, bleeding to death and nobody to look after them. Those who lived nearby came and carried away some of the wounded from the heap of dead and dying, but the unfortunate country people died there miserably of their wounds. This is what is done in 1919 in British India…
Centuries hence you will find Indian children brought up to this spot, just as they visit now the Cawnpore Well, and you can imagine the feelings of these Indians for generations over this terrible business.
[Col. Wedgwood, MP, speaking in the British Parliament, 22 December 1919]
View More Questions