Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is an "EXCEPT" question. We must identify the one statement that is most likely false or not mentioned, based on the inferred content of the passage. The other four statements are likely to be true according to the passage.
Step 2: Reconstructing the Passage's Argument:
Based on the other options, the passage likely argues the following:
Deep learning is a unifying technology (A).
Multimodal models are an advance over language-only models (E).
They achieve this by using visual and sensory data (B) to get a more comprehensive understanding of the world (D).
These points form a coherent argument in favor of multimodal AI.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Let's evaluate each option in light of this reconstructed argument.
(A), (B), (D), (E): These four statements work together to build a consistent argument about the benefits of multimodal AI. It is highly probable that a passage on this topic would make these claims.
(C): This statement claims that language-only models have a "limitless capacity." The word "limitless" is an extreme, absolute term. Technical and scientific passages are typically nuanced and focus on both the capabilities and the limitations of a technology. It is highly improbable that the author would describe any current technology, especially one being compared to a more advanced alternative, as having "limitless capacity." The passage's purpose is likely to highlight the \textit{limits} of language-only models, which multimodal approaches overcome.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The claim that language-only models have "limitless capacity" is an extreme and unrealistic assertion that contradicts the likely theme of the passage, which is about the limitations of such models. Therefore, this is the statement that would not be true according to the passage.