Comprehension
Acrucial moderating factor in how people experience comparisons is self-esteem. Individuals with high self-esteem are more likely to interpret upward comparison as informative rather than threatening. They are more resilient in the face of others’ success and more likely to believe they can reach their own goals. In contrast, people with low self-esteem are more prone to interpret comparison as judgment, reinforcing negative self-views and triggering feelings of inadequacy.
This dynamic creates a self-reinforcing loop. People with high self-esteem are less vulnerable to upward comparison, which intensifies those doubts. Those with a secure sense of self are more likely to use comparison as a learning tool. The same external stimulus—a colleague’s achievements, a friend’s popularity—can have radically different effects depending on internal stability.
Self-esteem also influences how people choose their comparison targets. Research has found that individuals often engage in “selective comparison,” seeking out those who confirm their existing beliefs about themselves. This can become a subtle form of self-sabotage. Someone who feels unworthy may subconsciously seek out targets that reinforce that sense, perpetuating a narrative of inferiority. One of the most promising antidotes to social comparison is temporal comparison—evaluating oneself not against others, but against one’s own past. This method has been shown to increase motivation and satisfaction, especially when individuals can see concrete progress. Temporal comparison activates the same reward circuits as social comparison but avoids the threat systems associated with social ranking. It also reinforces agency: individuals focus on what they can control and improve rather than what others control. In therapeutic and coaching settings, temporal comparison is used to help clients build self-efficacy and track growth over time.
Moreover, people who focus on self-improvement rather than social dominance are less likely to fall into cycles of envy or self-pity. They can still use others as inspiration, but they do so without attaching their self-worth to the outcome. This is not to say they never compare—but that they focus on learning, rather than judgment. The most skilful approach to comparison may lie in eliminating it, but in reframing it as feedback. When we interpret comparison as information rather than a verdict, we can ask, “What can I learn from this?” This shift turns comparison into a growth tool. Teachers mentor their students, not as rivals. Psychologists emphasize that the key variable here is mindset.
A fixed mindset sees comparison as a threat. If someone else is better, it means we are worse. A growth mindset sees comparison as a map. If someone else has reached a certain level, it means the path exists. This reframing is not just a cognitive trick. It changes the emotional tone of comparison, making it more likely to inspire than to wound. Reframing also requires emotional regulation—the ability to notice an initial pang of envy or shame without reacting impulsively. With practice, individuals can learn to pause, reflect, and reinterpret their emotional responses. Over time, this builds resilience and self-trust, allowing comparison to become a learning tool rather than a cage.
This dynamic creates a self-reinforcing loop. People with high self-esteem are less vulnerable to upward comparison, which intensifies those doubts. Those with a secure sense of self are more likely to use comparison as a learning tool. The same external stimulus—a colleague’s achievements, a friend’s popularity—can have radically different effects depending on internal stability.
Self-esteem also influences how people choose their comparison targets. Research has found that individuals often engage in “selective comparison,” seeking out those who confirm their existing beliefs about themselves. This can become a subtle form of self-sabotage. Someone who feels unworthy may subconsciously seek out targets that reinforce that sense, perpetuating a narrative of inferiority. One of the most promising antidotes to social comparison is temporal comparison—evaluating oneself not against others, but against one’s own past. This method has been shown to increase motivation and satisfaction, especially when individuals can see concrete progress. Temporal comparison activates the same reward circuits as social comparison but avoids the threat systems associated with social ranking. It also reinforces agency: individuals focus on what they can control and improve rather than what others control. In therapeutic and coaching settings, temporal comparison is used to help clients build self-efficacy and track growth over time.
Moreover, people who focus on self-improvement rather than social dominance are less likely to fall into cycles of envy or self-pity. They can still use others as inspiration, but they do so without attaching their self-worth to the outcome. This is not to say they never compare—but that they focus on learning, rather than judgment. The most skilful approach to comparison may lie in eliminating it, but in reframing it as feedback. When we interpret comparison as information rather than a verdict, we can ask, “What can I learn from this?” This shift turns comparison into a growth tool. Teachers mentor their students, not as rivals. Psychologists emphasize that the key variable here is mindset.
A fixed mindset sees comparison as a threat. If someone else is better, it means we are worse. A growth mindset sees comparison as a map. If someone else has reached a certain level, it means the path exists. This reframing is not just a cognitive trick. It changes the emotional tone of comparison, making it more likely to inspire than to wound. Reframing also requires emotional regulation—the ability to notice an initial pang of envy or shame without reacting impulsively. With practice, individuals can learn to pause, reflect, and reinterpret their emotional responses. Over time, this builds resilience and self-trust, allowing comparison to become a learning tool rather than a cage.
Question: 1
Based on the passage, which of the following options will the author BEST agree with regarding the differences between temporal and social comparison?
Based on the passage, which of the following options will the author BEST agree with regarding the differences between temporal and social comparison?
Show Hint
Look for answers that best capture the main contrasts described in the passage. Temporal comparison is framed as a positive, self-empowering approach, while social comparison is linked to threat responses.
Updated On: Jan 7, 2026
- Temporal comparison excludes objectivity by excluding all interpretation, whereas social comparison is externally influenced.
- Temporal comparison measures performance by embedding it in a hierarchy, whereas social comparison does not.
- Temporal comparison relies on both reward and threat circuits, whereas social comparison relies only on the threat circuitry.
- Temporal comparison eliminates threat responses, whereas social comparison eliminates threat circuitry.
- Temporal comparison eliminates threat responses, whereas social comparison activates the emotional threat circuitry.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the passage.
The passage explains how temporal comparison helps individuals focus on their own progress, activating reward circuits without triggering the threat systems linked to social comparison. On the other hand, social comparison is associated with the activation of threat systems due to the ranking of individuals.
Step 2: Evaluating the options.
- (A) Temporal comparison excludes objectivity by excluding all interpretation, whereas social comparison is externally influenced: This does not match the passage. Temporal comparison is presented as a way to improve self-assessment, not as a method that excludes interpretation.
- (B) Temporal comparison measures performance by embedding it in a hierarchy, whereas social comparison does not: The passage does not suggest that temporal comparison embeds performance in a hierarchy, so this is incorrect.
- (C) Temporal comparison relies on both reward and threat circuits, whereas social comparison relies only on the threat circuitry: This is the correct answer. The passage clearly mentions that social comparison activates threat circuits, while temporal comparison activates both reward and threat systems, though with a focus on the reward circuits.
- (D) Temporal comparison eliminates threat responses, whereas social comparison eliminates threat circuitry: This is incorrect because the passage does not suggest that temporal comparison eliminates threat responses entirely, only that it avoids them.
- (E) Temporal comparison eliminates threat responses, whereas social comparison activates the emotional threat circuitry: While partially correct, it is not as precise as option (C), which directly mentions the activation of both reward and threat circuits in temporal comparison.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (C) because it accurately reflects the passage's description of how temporal comparison engages both reward and threat circuits, while social comparison primarily activates threat circuitry.
The passage explains how temporal comparison helps individuals focus on their own progress, activating reward circuits without triggering the threat systems linked to social comparison. On the other hand, social comparison is associated with the activation of threat systems due to the ranking of individuals.
Step 2: Evaluating the options.
- (A) Temporal comparison excludes objectivity by excluding all interpretation, whereas social comparison is externally influenced: This does not match the passage. Temporal comparison is presented as a way to improve self-assessment, not as a method that excludes interpretation.
- (B) Temporal comparison measures performance by embedding it in a hierarchy, whereas social comparison does not: The passage does not suggest that temporal comparison embeds performance in a hierarchy, so this is incorrect.
- (C) Temporal comparison relies on both reward and threat circuits, whereas social comparison relies only on the threat circuitry: This is the correct answer. The passage clearly mentions that social comparison activates threat circuits, while temporal comparison activates both reward and threat systems, though with a focus on the reward circuits.
- (D) Temporal comparison eliminates threat responses, whereas social comparison eliminates threat circuitry: This is incorrect because the passage does not suggest that temporal comparison eliminates threat responses entirely, only that it avoids them.
- (E) Temporal comparison eliminates threat responses, whereas social comparison activates the emotional threat circuitry: While partially correct, it is not as precise as option (C), which directly mentions the activation of both reward and threat circuits in temporal comparison.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (C) because it accurately reflects the passage's description of how temporal comparison engages both reward and threat circuits, while social comparison primarily activates threat circuitry.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
Based on the passage, which of the following will the author MOST agree with?
Based on the passage, which of the following will the author MOST agree with?
Show Hint
When evaluating passages, focus on the author's main message. In this case, the author emphasizes the positive role of self-esteem in interpreting comparisons as opportunities for learning and growth.
Updated On: Jan 7, 2026
- High self-esteem affects upward comparison negatively, but resilience helps cope with the negativity.
- High self-esteem ensures that the anchor of comparison is seen as opportunity for growth.
- The need for upward comparison reduces when we have high self-esteem.
- High self-esteem creates a reinforcing loop of adequacy making us look forward to upward social comparison.
- High self-esteem ensures that upward comparison must yield positive results.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the passage.
The passage discusses how individuals with high self-esteem interpret upward comparison as an opportunity to grow, rather than as a threat or source of negativity. This is a key takeaway from the author's view on self-esteem and comparison.
Step 2: Evaluating the options.
- (A) High self-esteem affects upward comparison negatively, but resilience helps cope with the negativity: The passage suggests that high self-esteem helps individuals see comparison as a tool for growth, not negatively. This does not align with the author’s perspective.
- (B) High self-esteem ensures that the anchor of comparison is seen as opportunity for growth: This is the correct answer as it best reflects the passage’s message that self-esteem helps individuals view comparisons in a positive light.
- (C) The need for upward comparison reduces when we have high self-esteem: While this is true in some sense, the passage focuses more on how self-esteem influences the way comparisons are interpreted rather than the frequency of upward comparisons.
- (D) High self-esteem creates a reinforcing loop of adequacy making us look forward to upward social comparison: This is not the best fit, as the passage talks about the positive effects of self-esteem but does not suggest that people look forward to upward comparison, but rather use it as a tool for growth.
- (E) High self-esteem ensures that upward comparison must yield positive results: This is incorrect, as the passage emphasizes viewing comparison as a tool for growth, not necessarily ensuring positive results.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (B) because it best represents how high self-esteem allows individuals to view comparison as an opportunity for growth.
The passage discusses how individuals with high self-esteem interpret upward comparison as an opportunity to grow, rather than as a threat or source of negativity. This is a key takeaway from the author's view on self-esteem and comparison.
Step 2: Evaluating the options.
- (A) High self-esteem affects upward comparison negatively, but resilience helps cope with the negativity: The passage suggests that high self-esteem helps individuals see comparison as a tool for growth, not negatively. This does not align with the author’s perspective.
- (B) High self-esteem ensures that the anchor of comparison is seen as opportunity for growth: This is the correct answer as it best reflects the passage’s message that self-esteem helps individuals view comparisons in a positive light.
- (C) The need for upward comparison reduces when we have high self-esteem: While this is true in some sense, the passage focuses more on how self-esteem influences the way comparisons are interpreted rather than the frequency of upward comparisons.
- (D) High self-esteem creates a reinforcing loop of adequacy making us look forward to upward social comparison: This is not the best fit, as the passage talks about the positive effects of self-esteem but does not suggest that people look forward to upward comparison, but rather use it as a tool for growth.
- (E) High self-esteem ensures that upward comparison must yield positive results: This is incorrect, as the passage emphasizes viewing comparison as a tool for growth, not necessarily ensuring positive results.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (B) because it best represents how high self-esteem allows individuals to view comparison as an opportunity for growth.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
Based on the passage, which of the following is NOT true about comparison?
Based on the passage, which of the following is NOT true about comparison?
Show Hint
When reading comprehension passages, focus on the subtle distinctions made by the author. In this case, the passage differentiates between how self-esteem influences the interpretation of comparison, but does not suggest that a growth mindset can alter the impact of negative comparisons.
Updated On: Jan 7, 2026
- The effect of negative comparisons can be altered when individuals approach it with a growth-oriented mindset.
- Variation in self-esteem influences how individuals perceive comparisons with others.
- The impact of social comparison depends on how individuals interpret comparisons with others.
- People with high self-esteem do not require to rely on temporal comparison for learning.
- Individuals with low self-esteem prefer those comparisons that reinforce negative self-evaluation.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the passage.
The passage describes how comparison can be influenced by self-esteem and mindset. It discusses how people with high self-esteem do not necessarily rely on upward comparisons for learning, and how those with low self-esteem may prefer negative comparisons. However, the passage does not claim that a growth mindset directly alters the effects of negative comparisons.
Step 2: Evaluating the options.
- (A) The effect of negative comparisons can be altered when individuals approach it with a growth-oriented mindset: The passage does not suggest that a growth mindset alters the effects of negative comparisons, but rather discusses how comparison is viewed differently depending on self-esteem. This option is the most incorrect.
- (B) Variation in self-esteem influences how individuals perceive comparisons with others: This is true. The passage mentions how self-esteem affects how comparison is perceived, whether as a judgment or as a learning opportunity.
- (C) The impact of social comparison depends on how individuals interpret comparisons with others: This is correct. The passage states that social comparison can be either beneficial or detrimental, depending on how it is interpreted.
- (D) People with high self-esteem do not require to rely on temporal comparison for learning: This is true. The passage suggests that individuals with high self-esteem may not need to rely on temporal comparison for growth.
- (E) Individuals with low self-esteem prefer those comparisons that reinforce negative self-evaluation: This is accurate. The passage mentions that individuals with low self-esteem tend to seek comparisons that reinforce negative self-views.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A) because the passage does not support the idea that a growth mindset directly alters the effects of negative comparisons.
The passage describes how comparison can be influenced by self-esteem and mindset. It discusses how people with high self-esteem do not necessarily rely on upward comparisons for learning, and how those with low self-esteem may prefer negative comparisons. However, the passage does not claim that a growth mindset directly alters the effects of negative comparisons.
Step 2: Evaluating the options.
- (A) The effect of negative comparisons can be altered when individuals approach it with a growth-oriented mindset: The passage does not suggest that a growth mindset alters the effects of negative comparisons, but rather discusses how comparison is viewed differently depending on self-esteem. This option is the most incorrect.
- (B) Variation in self-esteem influences how individuals perceive comparisons with others: This is true. The passage mentions how self-esteem affects how comparison is perceived, whether as a judgment or as a learning opportunity.
- (C) The impact of social comparison depends on how individuals interpret comparisons with others: This is correct. The passage states that social comparison can be either beneficial or detrimental, depending on how it is interpreted.
- (D) People with high self-esteem do not require to rely on temporal comparison for learning: This is true. The passage suggests that individuals with high self-esteem may not need to rely on temporal comparison for growth.
- (E) Individuals with low self-esteem prefer those comparisons that reinforce negative self-evaluation: This is accurate. The passage mentions that individuals with low self-esteem tend to seek comparisons that reinforce negative self-views.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A) because the passage does not support the idea that a growth mindset directly alters the effects of negative comparisons.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Reading Comprehension
- State whether the following statements are true or false: (i) Global warming is creating a lot of problems
True or False (ii) Many species have not become extinct
True or False (iii) Air and sound pollution are the main causes of animal extinction
True or False (iv) Animals live in forests and oceans
True or False- Maharashtra Class X Board - 2026
- English
- Reading Comprehension
Write any four problems faced by the animals that thrive in forests and oceans:
- Maharashtra Class X Board - 2026
- English
- Reading Comprehension
Verbal to Non-Verbal:
A stain is an unwanted mark of discolouration on a fabric caused due to contact with another substance which cannot be removed by the normal washing process. Stains can be grouped on the basis of their origin, e.g. tea, coffee and fruits come from vegetable source. Stains from shoe polish, tar, oil paints come under grease stains. Animal stains comprise of stains formed by milk, blood and eggs, whereas marks on your clothes after sitting on an iron bench are those of rust and come under mineral stains. Then there are stains that are formed due to dye, into perspiration which can be categorised under miscellaneous stains. Read the given passage and complete the table. Suggest a suitable title.
- Maharashtra Class X Board - 2026
- English
- Reading Comprehension
- Each of these questions has a text portion followed by four alternative summaries. best captures the essence of the text.
Some decisions will be fairly obvious "no brainers". Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to someplace warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws' offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.- MAT - 2026
- English Language Comprehension
- Reading Comprehension
- Shown below are letters ‘e’ taken from four popular logos, arranged in a sequence. Which of the options is the correct sequence?
- UCEED - 2026
- English Language Comprehension
- Reading Comprehension
View More Questions
Questions Asked in XAT exam
- Two trains running at constant speed between Jamshedpur and Kolkata take 3 hours and 4 hours respectively. The train from Jamshedpur halves its speed after running for one hour. How much total time do the trains take to meet?
- XAT - 2026
- Time and Work
- Two buses travel between Jamshedpur and Kolkata in the opposite directions, on the same road. On that road, the maximum allowed speeds are different (but constant) for the opposite directions. Usually, both buses travel at the respective maximum allowed speeds to their respective destinations: the bus from Jamshedpur to Kolkata takes 4 hours, while the bus from Kolkata to Jamshedpur takes 3 hours.
One day, the two buses start at the same time. However, one hour after starting, the bus from Jamshedpur to Kolkata reduces its speed to half of its maximum allowed speed due to congestion on the road.
If both buses do not stop anywhere in between, how many hours after starting do they meet?
- XAT - 2026
- Time and Work
- An artificial swimming pool is circular and water is flowing clockwise at a speed of 3 km/hr. Two swimmers Ayub and Rana start from diametrically opposite points, Ayub in the anticlockwise direction and Rana in the clockwise direction. They first meet at a point such that Ayub has covered 60 m by that time. Their second meeting point is such that Rana has covered another 180 m after the first meeting point. If the speed of Rana in still water is 3 km/hr, find the time taken by Ayub to cover one full circle in the clockwise direction.
- XAT - 2026
- Time and Work
- Arrange the following generations from the oldest to the youngest:
1. Generation X
2. Silent Generation
3. Generation Alpha
4. Baby Boomers
5. Millennials
- XAT - 2026
- Current Affairs
- Read the following scenario and answer the THREE questions that follow.
Brijbhushan, a microfinancier, lends money at the rate of Rs.10 per square meter to small farmers at a village. He charges an annual interest rate of 10%. All the farming plots in that village are rectangular, with areas varying between a minimum of 1000 square meters and a maximum of 10,000 square meters.
This year, Brijbhushan has lent money only to five farmers: Aditya, Binod, Chhuttan, Dabloo and Govind. The perimeter of Chhuttan’s plot is 250 meters, with the length and width being at a ratio of 4:1. Aditya’s plot has an area three times the area of Govind’s plot. The area of Aditya’s plot is also the average of the areas of Govind’s plot and Dabloo’s plot. The plots belonging to Aditya, Binod and Dabloo are of the same width, but of different lengths. Moreover, the length of Binod’s plot is the sum of the lengths of Aditya’s plot and Dabloo’s plot.- XAT - 2026
- Mensuration
View More Questions