Step 1: Understanding the Question:
We are told a sheet metal drawing is feasible only if two conditions hold together: the reduction ratio must be less than 0.5, and the thickness to blank diameter ratio must be greater than 1 percent.
We are given the sheet thickness \( t = 2\ mm \), the punch diameter \( d_p = 100\ mm \), and four candidate blank diameters, and we must find which one satisfies both conditions at once.
Step 2: Key Formulas:
The reduction ratio in deep drawing compares how much smaller the punch is than the starting blank.
\[ \text{Reduction Ratio} = \frac{D_b - d_p}{D_b} \]
The thickness to diameter ratio is simply the sheet thickness divided by the blank diameter.
\[ \text{Thickness to Diameter Ratio} = \frac{t}{D_b} \]
Step 3: Applying the reduction ratio condition:
We need \( \frac{D_b - 100}{D_b} < 0.5 \).
\[ 1 - \frac{100}{D_b} < 0.5 \ \Rightarrow\ \frac{100}{D_b} > 0.5 \ \Rightarrow\ D_b < \frac{100}{0.5} = 200\ mm \]
So the blank diameter must stay below 200 mm just to satisfy the reduction ratio rule.
Step 4: Applying the thickness to diameter condition:
We need \( \frac{2}{D_b} > 0.01 \).
\[ D_b < \frac{2}{0.01} = 200\ mm \]
Interestingly, both conditions independently give the exact same upper limit, \( D_b < 200\ mm \).
Step 5: Testing each option against \( D_b < 200\ mm \):
Option (A) 150 mm is less than 200 mm, so it satisfies both conditions and is feasible.
Option (B) 250 mm is greater than 200 mm, so it fails both conditions.
Option (C) 350 mm is much greater than 200 mm, so it fails both conditions.
Option (D) 450 mm is far above 200 mm, so it also fails both conditions.
Final Answer:
Only a blank diameter of 150 mm keeps the process within both feasibility limits.
\[ \boxed{D_b = 150\ mm} \]