Step 1: Recall Terzaghi's bearing capacity equation for a strip footing.
\[ q_u = cN_c + qN_q + 0.5\gamma B N_\gamma \]
For a purely cohesive soil (\(\phi = 0\)), the bearing capacity factors take the special values \(N_c = 5.7\), \(N_q = 1\), and \(N_\gamma = 0\).
Step 2: Write the gross and net ultimate bearing capacity.
Here \(q = \gamma D_f\) is the effective overburden pressure at the footing base. Since \(N_\gamma = 0\), the width term vanishes entirely:
\[ q_u(\text{gross}) = cN_c + qN_q = cN_c + q \]
The net ultimate bearing capacity removes the overburden pressure that already existed in the ground before the footing was built:
\[ q_u(\text{net}) = q_u(\text{gross}) - q = cN_c + q(N_q-1) \]
Step 3: Substitute \(N_q = 1\).
Since \(N_q = 1\), the term \(q(N_q-1) = q(1-1) = 0\). So
\[ q_u(\text{net}) = cN_c \]
The net ultimate bearing capacity depends only on cohesion and \(N_c\); it contains no \(\gamma\), \(D_f\), or water table term at all.
Step 4: Apply this before and after the water table rise.
Before the rise, \(q_u(\text{net}) = cN_c = 20 \times 5.7 = 114\) kPa.
After the rise, the overburden pressure at the footing base would ordinarily be recomputed with the submerged unit weight, reducing \(q\). But since the net capacity formula has already cancelled the \(q\) term completely in Step 3, this change has zero effect on \(q_u(\text{net})\); it stays at 114 kPa.
Step 5: Compute the percentage change.
\[ \%\text{change} = \frac{114-114}{114}\times100=0 \]
Final Answer:
For a purely cohesive (\(\phi=0\)) soil, Terzaghi's net ultimate bearing capacity does not depend on unit weight or water table position, because \(N_\gamma=0\) removes the width/weight term and \(N_q=1\) makes the overburden term cancel exactly in the net definition.
\[ \boxed{\%\text{change} = 0.00\%} \]