Step 1: Set up a formula for the total number of calls.
Let \(T(n)\) be the total number of function-call activations made while computing \(mystery(n)\), counting the call itself. For \(n \leq 0\), the function returns immediately with no further recursive calls, so \(T(n) = 1\) in that base case. For \(n > 0\), the call makes 1 activation for itself, plus it calls \(mystery(n-1)\) and \(mystery(n-2)\), contributing all of their activations too. So
\[ T(n) = 1 + T(n-1) + T(n-2), \quad n > 0 \]
Step 2: Compute the base cases.
\(T(0) = 1\) (base case, no recursive calls).
\(T(-1) = 1\) (also a base case, since \(-1 \leq 0\)).
Step 3: Build up \(T(1)\) through \(T(4)\) using the recursion.
\(T(1) = 1 + T(0) + T(-1) = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3\)
\(T(2) = 1 + T(1) + T(0) = 1 + 3 + 1 = 5\)
\(T(3) = 1 + T(2) + T(1) = 1 + 5 + 3 = 9\)
\(T(4) = 1 + T(3) + T(2) = 1 + 9 + 5 = 15\)
Step 4: Double check by picturing the call tree shape.
\(mystery(4)\) calls \(mystery(3)\) and \(mystery(2)\); \(mystery(3)\) calls \(mystery(2)\) and \(mystery(1)\); and so on, exactly mirroring the Fibonacci recursion tree. Counting every node in this tree, including leaves that hit the base case, gives the same total of 15.
Step 5: Compare with the options.
5 would be \(T(2)\), and 9 would be \(T(3)\); both undercount by stopping the recursion too early. 17 does not match any correct partial sum of this recursion. 15 matches \(T(4)\) computed above.
Final Answer:
The total number of function calls to compute \(mystery(4)\) is 15, which is option (C).