Concept:
- Build one general formula for the efficiency of the cycle in terms of the volume ratio $r=V_2/V_1$ first, before plugging in any specific number -- this settles the temperature-dependence question in one shot and reuses the same formula for every other check.
- For an isothermal step, $PV=\text{constant}$ gives the pressure ratio directly from the volume ratio.
- For an adiabatic step, $TV^{\gamma-1}=\text{constant}$ gives the temperature ratio directly from the volume ratio.
- Both heats in this cycle carry a common factor of $T_a$, so that temperature always cancels out of any ratio built from them, such as efficiency.
Step 1: Set up the temperature and pressure ratios in terms of $r$.
Adiabatic leg $c \to a$: $T_c V_2^{\gamma-1}=T_a V_1^{\gamma-1}$, so $\frac{T_a}{T_c}=r^{\gamma-1}$. For a monoatomic gas $\gamma=\frac{5}{3}$, so $\frac{T_a}{T_c}=r^{2/3}$.
Isothermal leg $a \to b$: $P_a V_1=P_b V_2$, so $\frac{P_a}{P_b}=r$.
Step 2: Build $Q_{in}$ and $Q_{out}$ symbolically, keeping $T_a$ as a letter, not a number.
$Q_{in}=Q_{ab}=nRT_a\ln r$.
Since $T_b=T_a$ and $T_c=T_a r^{-2/3}$, the isochoric leg gives $Q_{out}=|Q_{bc}|=nC_v(T_b-T_c)=\frac{3}{2}nRT_a\left(1-r^{-2/3}\right)$.
Step 3: Build $\eta(r)$ and watch $T_a$ cancel -- this settles statement (B).
$\eta=1-\frac{Q_{out}}{Q_{in}}=1-\frac{\frac{3}{2}nRT_a\left(1-r^{-2/3}\right)}{nRT_a\ln r}=1-\frac{3\left(1-r^{-2/3}\right)}{2\ln r}$.
$T_a$ sits in both the numerator and denominator, so it cancels completely -- efficiency depends only on $r$, for every value of $r$, not just $8$. Statement (B) is TRUE.
Step 4: Plug $r=8$ into Step 1 to settle statements (C) and (D).
$\frac{T_a}{T_c}=8^{2/3}=(2^3)^{2/3}=2^2=4$, so $T_a=4T_c$, matching statement (C). Statement (C) is TRUE.
$\frac{P_a}{P_b}=8$, not $4$, so statement (D) is FALSE.
Step 5: Plug $r=8$ into Step 2 to settle statement (A).
$Q_{in}=nRT_a\ln 8=3nRT_a\ln2\approx3(0.7)nRT_a=2.1\,nRT_a$.
$Q_{out}=\frac{3}{2}nRT_a\left(1-8^{-2/3}\right)=\frac{3}{2}nRT_a\left(1-\frac{1}{4}\right)=\frac{3}{2}nRT_a\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)=1.125\,nRT_a$.
Since $1.125\,nRT_a$ is smaller than $2.1\,nRT_a$, the heat released in $bc$ is indeed smaller than the heat absorbed in $ab$. Statement (A) is TRUE.
Final Answer: Statements (A), (B) and (C) are correct; (D) is incorrect.