A concrete example makes this easy to check. Suppose an ideal voltage source of value \(V\) feeds two resistors \(R_1\) and \(R_2\) in series, so the voltage across \(R_2\) is \(V\dfrac{R_2}{R_1+R_2}\) by the voltage-divider rule. Doubling both resistors to \(2R_1\) and \(2R_2\) gives a new voltage across the second resistor of \(V\dfrac{2R_2}{2R_1+2R_2} = V\dfrac{R_2}{R_1+R_2}\), which is algebraically identical to the original expression, since the factor of 2 cancels top and bottom.
Because the network contains only linear resistors and ideal voltage sources, scaling every resistance by the same factor scales every current inversely but leaves every voltage division ratio, and therefore every voltage across a resistor, exactly as it was.
Therefore, the correct answer is not changed.