Step 1: List the base prices.
Shirt = Rs. 800, Trouser = Rs. 1000, Shoes = Rs. 2000, Belt = Rs. 500. We need the minimum amount to walk away with a shirt, a trouser and a pair of shoes.
Step 2: Check statement (1) alone.
A 30% discount on the shirt and the trouser means the shirt now costs \(800\times0.7=560\) and the trouser costs \(1000\times0.7=700\). The shoes stay at full price, Rs. 2000, since the discount does not apply to them. Adding these up: \[ 560+700+2000=3260 \] This is one definite number, so statement (1) alone answers the question with a minimum of Rs. 3260.
Step 3: Check statement (2) alone.
Statement (2) gives two offers: buying a shirt and a trouser gets a free belt (not useful here since the belt is not needed), and buying a pair of shoes and a trouser gets a free shirt. Using the second offer, buy the trouser (Rs. 1000) and the shoes (Rs. 2000), and the shirt comes free. That totals \[ 1000+2000=3000 \] Buying all three separately without the offer would cost \(800+1000+2000=3800\), which is more, so the shoe-and-trouser offer gives the lowest cost, Rs. 3000. This is again one definite number, so statement (2) alone is also enough on its own.
Step 4: Final answer.
Each statement, used by itself, gives a complete way to compute the minimum spend (Rs. 3260 from statement 1, Rs. 3000 from statement 2).
\[ \boxed{\text{Either statement alone is sufficient}} \]